The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

FedEx Sulks About Labor Law Reform

by David Doorey March 29, 2009
written by David Doorey March 29, 2009

 
Image Preview   Remember the big suck in the school yard who would take his ball and go home if he didn’t get his own way. Meet FedEx.  According to the Wall Street Journal, the delivery company has threatened to pull a huge order for new planes, which would be  a big boost to the economy, if the government carries through with a plan to move the company under the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).   What’s the problem with the NLRA, according to Fed Ex?  It is easier to organize unions under the NLRA than the RLA, because smaller bargaining units are permitted.  
To be honest, it was news to me that it wasn’t already covered by the NLRA.  Apparently, it is covered by the Railway Labor Act because, historically, it was an airline (it is much more than an airline now).  On the other hand, its direct competitor, UPS, is covered by the NLRA.  So, insofar as it is true that Fed Ex would be a greater risk of unionization under the NLRA, the government has helped Fed Ex remain non-union by treating it differently than its competitors and by making it more difficult for its employees to exercise the right to collective bargaining.  Fed Ex claims that simply being under the NLRA (which applies to the vast majority of US workplaces) would “cripple the company”.  
Oh brother. Every time a North American government talks about improving access to collective bargaining, the business community whine and complain that the entire economy will crumble.  We saw that in Ontario during the early 1990s when the NDP made some relatively modest changes to the Labour Relations Act. Keep in mind that the NLRA is a lousy model for encouraging unionization.  America has the lowest unionization rate of any advanced economic country in the world.  Less than 12% of workers are unionized in the U.S., and the number drops well below 10% when we consider only the private sector.  So its a bit rich to argue that the NLRA will result in mass unionization of Fed Ex.  True, the proposed reforms to the NLRA may be a boost to organizing.  But note the underlying theme in Fed Ex’s position:  it is that if its workers were covered by a model that actually makes it possible to unionize, loads of them would opt to join unions, and this would cut into Fed Ex’s profits.
What does it say about a company’s human resources strategy when the company publicly acknowledges that the only reason its employees are non-union is that the state’s model for union organizing effectively prevents unionization?  Here’s a thought:  if Fed Ex is such a lousy employer that its employees will go rushing into the arms of a union once that option is available, then maybe Fed Ex really ought to be unionized.  What do you think?

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Must My Employer Pay Me When I Miss Work to Observe a Religious Holiday?
next post
Supreme Court Leave Decision in Fraser v. Ontario on Thursday

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
17h

A Nationwide Bargaining Unit to Fight Starbucks Is a Moon Shot Worth Trying

My latest on ⁦@jacobin⁩. https://jacobin.com/2022/08/starbucks-service-unions-nlrb-law-centralized-bargaining/

Reply on Twitter 1556339370461786112Retweet on Twitter 15563393704617861122Like on Twitter 155633937046178611211Twitter 1556339370461786112
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
21h

Luck is part of it for sure. Right time right place. True of a lot of jobs not just academia.

But in my experience sitting on lots of academic hiring committees, people selected have superior CVs. 60 applicants, one position. Not all luck. It’s a very competitive job market.

David Webster@dwebsterhist

I've been hired for 2 tenure track jobs and been on multiple committees, sent in more than 100 job applications, and done multiple interviews. Here is my thread 🛢
of job market advice for early career academics based on decades of experience:

1. Get lucky.

Reply on Twitter 1556285407817506817Retweet on Twitter 1556285407817506817Like on Twitter 15562854078175068171Twitter 1556285407817506817
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
6 Aug

Sunflowers!

Reply on Twitter 1556032894640037890Retweet on Twitter 1556032894640037890Like on Twitter 15560328946400378905Twitter 1556032894640037890
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.