Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
Law of Work Archive

Some Questions Arising from the Star's Fantastic Expose of Temp Worker Abuse

by David Doorey September 12, 2017
written by David Doorey September 12, 2017

There is a long proud line of labour reporters who over the years have influenced labour policy by shining a spotlight on abusive labour practices.  As the newspaper industry for survival in the electronic age, labour reporters have been given white slips, sometime replaced by gossip columnists whose stories get more website hits.
But here in Canada there are still some great labour reporters, and my favorite

Toronto Star Labour Reporter Sara Mojtehedzadeh (Credit: Canadian Media Guild)

Toronto Star Labour Reporter Sara Mojtehedzadeh (Credit: Canadian Media Guild)


for the past few years has been Sara Mojtehedzadeh at the Toronto Star.  Sara has focused on vulnerable workers in a series of great stories.  However her latest investigative piece reaches new heights.  Already it has put the Minister of Labour on the defensive, forcing him to concede that new laws are needed to deal with companies that exploit the use of temp placement agencies to avoid hiring their own full time employees.
The piece is called “Undercover in Temp Nation“.   Read it.  Then read it again.  This article will be used in work law and work study courses for years to come.  Sara went undercover as a temp worker at a large Toronto industrial baker called Fiera Foods, a company I pass on my drive to York University and that I have never paid any attention to before.  The story describes how three temp workers have already been killed in accidents at Fiera Foods.  It also notes that the Ontario Liberals lauded Fiera in 2013 for creating “good jobs”, how it has received millions of dollars in tax payer subsidies, and how it donated $25,000 to the Liberals since 2010.
Sara describes a modern day sweatshop staffed by an army of workers, the vast
Fiera Foods in Toronto (Source: Toronto Star)

Fiera Foods in Toronto (Source: Toronto Star)


majority of whom do not work for Fiera but rather are employed by a ‘temp agency’ called Magnus.  Magnus is a virtual temp agency (it has no physical work site where employees go) “hires” Sara without ever meeting her and assigns her to Fierra Foods.  She is given 5 minutes of ‘training’ and begins work on a gruelling pastry assembly line.  To collect her pay, she is told to go to a non-descript money lender store on Steeles Avenue called “Cashmania”, where she is given cash and told that Magnus employees do not receive pay stubs and no statutory deductions are made.  It’s all under the table and off the records.
Of immediate interest to us work law folks is the long series of illegalities described in the story.  Rather than list them, I will leave you the reader to identity what potential statutory violations arise in the story.  I will just note as a hint that there are multiple statutes engaged.  (Special nudge:  Do any human rights issues arise in the story?)
Questions and Issues for Discussion
The government says it is exploring how to regulate temp agencies to discourage employers from using them instead of hiring full-time employees.
So far the government has focused on a law requiring temp workers to be paid equal to full-time employees of the company they are assigned to.  The idea is that this will remove the incentive for business to use temps.  Do you think that idea will work?
Sara the reporter notes that such a law would have little effect at a place like Fiera because virtually all of the workers are temps and they are paid just barely above minimum wage in any event.  
Another benefit to employers of using temp agencies is that legally the workers are employees of the temp company and not the ‘client’ business they are assigned to.   Therefore, workers’ compensation premiums must be paid by the temp agencies and the client saves on those costs.  Should the government require that workers’ comp premiums are the responsibility of the client of the temp agency?  Would that make a difference in the use of temps?
What about a law that restricted the use of temps to a certain percentage of a client’s workforce?  Is that law workable in practice?  Why or why not?
What about unionization?  The Ontario government has proposed in Bill 148 to introduce ‘card check certification’ in the temp placement agency, along with a  requirement for the temp employer to provide a list of names and contract information.  This may enable unions to organize temp workers and bargain collective agreements.  What if any obstacles do you foresee arising in relation to the unionization of temp agencies?
What other options exist to legislate in a manner that would discourage companies from using precarious temp workers rather than hire their own employees?
 

2 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is the Director of the School of HRM at York and Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and on the Advisory Board of the Osgoode Certificate program in Labour Law. He is a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program and a member of the International Advisory Committee on Harvard University’s Clean Slate Project, which is re-imaging labor law for the 21st century

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
Can an Employer Order a Female Employee to Wear a Bra at Work?
next post
Announcing the New "Law of Work Best Paper Award"

You may also like

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

A Successful Strike Vote is All That Stands...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Putin Invites Trump to Moscow for Second Meeting...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 219 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
24 Feb

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211853Twitter 1364627677785821185
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
24 Feb

Here's my latest in @jacobinmag.

If Ontario's labor laws applied in Alabama, the Amazon vote would have been held months ago so workers could get back to their jobs. Instead, the NLRA permits Amazon to conduct a months' long onslaught of anti-union propaganda. https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1364613560425275392

Jacobin@jacobinmag

Amazon workers in Alabama are voting on whether to unionize, but the company is bombarding them with anti-union propaganda. In Canada, by contrast, votes are held quickly, making it harder for companies to stack the deck — a model that can work in the US. http://jacobinmag.com/2021/02/amazon-alabama-canada-labor-law-union-vote

Reply on Twitter 1364623976174092316Retweet on Twitter 13646239761740923168Like on Twitter 136462397617409231613Twitter 1364623976174092316
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
24 Feb

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364605259071561730Retweet on Twitter 13646052590715617304Like on Twitter 13646052590715617304Twitter 1364605259071561730
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.