The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Dismissal of NHL Ref Not an Unfair Labour Practice

by David Doorey November 16, 2010
written by David Doorey November 16, 2010

I noted a case before the labour board a while back that involved allegation by an NHL referee, Dean Warren, that he had been dismissed by the NHL for union activity.  The Board issued its decision recently, ruling that the referee was dismissed for reasons unrelated to his activities with the referees’ union.  Here is the decision.
warrenThe first 171 paragraphs of the decision are recital of the facts and arguments.   Then the Board turns to the analysis.  My students will recognize the key sections of the Labour Relations Act at play in a case like this as Section 70 and 72.  They say, in essence, that an employer cannot threaten or impose discipline or dismissal on an employee because that employee has been active in lawful union activities.  Therefore, the sole issue before the Labour Board was whether the referee’s dismissal was influenced in any way by the employee’s union activity.  The Board does not consider whether the employer had “cause” to dismiss the referee.  The “reverse onus” section of the Act (section 96(5)) applies here, so the NHL had to prove that its reason for dismissal were completely unrelated to union activity.
The referee argued that the dismissal was related to his appointment to the officials’ union executive board as Vice President and his activities while in that position, particularly his aggressive advocacy on behalf of veteran refs.  Interestingly, Warren had obtained his NHL ref job after filing a complaint with the Human Rights Tribunal alleging that the NHL had refused him employment on the basis of his age (he was in his mid 30s when he started, which might be considered “old” to begin a pro refereeing career) .  The Labour Board rejects that argument, and finds that the dismissal was “work-related”.
The media this week is focusing on a series of emails sent by NHL officials describing Warren’s skill set. [Here is ESPN’s article].  The emails are profane and nasty, but do not mention his union activity.  The Board believes that the NHL just thought Warren was not a very strong referee.  Plus, the NHL decided it wanted to “remove some of the veteran referees to make room for new officials”, and that Warren was caught on the wrong end of that strategy.
As a result, the Board found that, “whether it was ‘fair or not'” the decision was not tainted by antiunion animus.  This is key.  The Board is not saying that the NHL acted “fairly” or that it agrees with how the NHL went about dismissing Warren, or even that it agreed with the decision to dismiss him.  All the Board has jurisdiction to ask is whether the dismissal was based in some part on the fact that Warren had been a union advocate.  The Board found no evidence of this, so Warren loses the case.

2 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Doorey Speaking at Ryerson's Labour-Management Centre
next post
Tomorrow: Doorey on Academic Blogging, Wikis, and Second Life

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
13h

A Nationwide Bargaining Unit to Fight Starbucks Is a Moon Shot Worth Trying

My latest on ⁦@jacobin⁩. https://jacobin.com/2022/08/starbucks-service-unions-nlrb-law-centralized-bargaining/

Reply on Twitter 1556339370461786112Retweet on Twitter 15563393704617861122Like on Twitter 155633937046178611211Twitter 1556339370461786112
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
17h

Luck is part of it for sure. Right time right place. True of a lot of jobs not just academia.

But in my experience sitting on lots of academic hiring committees, people selected have superior CVs. 60 applicants, one position. Not all luck. It’s a very competitive job market.

David Webster@dwebsterhist

I've been hired for 2 tenure track jobs and been on multiple committees, sent in more than 100 job applications, and done multiple interviews. Here is my thread 🛢
of job market advice for early career academics based on decades of experience:

1. Get lucky.

Reply on Twitter 1556285407817506817Retweet on Twitter 1556285407817506817Like on Twitter 15562854078175068171Twitter 1556285407817506817
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
6 Aug

Sunflowers!

Reply on Twitter 1556032894640037890Retweet on Twitter 1556032894640037890Like on Twitter 15560328946400378905Twitter 1556032894640037890
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.