Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
Law of Work Archive

Will Target Canada Buy the Unionized Zellers?

by David Doorey April 28, 2011
written by David Doorey April 28, 2011

Target purchased the rights to Zellers’ leases earlier this year for almost $2 billion, and announced with great fanfare that it was coming to conquer the Canadian retail industry.  I’ve never been to a Target, or a Wal-Mart for that matter, so I could really care less. Wal-Mart, Target… all the same to me.  Discount retail stores that earn billions of dollars in profits by driving down prices they pay suppliers and the wages they pay their own employees.
But we’ve been talking about Target around my house lately because my lovely spouse is representing a Canadian company called Target Apparel in a big battle over trademarks.   American Target has sued the Canadian Target Apparel, claiming it is the only company on the planet permitted to use the word Target in their name, even though Canadian Target Apparel has owned the brand for decades and American Target just announced this year that they were coming to Canada in 3 more years!  Go Canada, Go little Target Apparel!
But I digress.  Target purchased the lease rights to 220 Zellers stores, but it does not need to keep them all.  It was given a few months to choose which stores it wanted.  It says it wants between 100-150 of the stores to convert to Target.  Interestingly, 15 of those Zellers stores are unionized.  Over 1500 Zellers’ employees at 15 stores in B.C., Ontario, and Quebec are covered by collective agreements with the United Food and Commercial Workers, according to the union.
The question is, is there a chance in hell that those 15 stores will be among the chosen ones when Target announces which leases it’s taking?
When a company purchases a unionized business, it inherits the employees and any collective agreement that governed them.  That is governed by the sale of business provisions in labour relations legislation, such as section 69 of the Ontario Labour Relations Act.  The definition of “sale” is very broad, and includes a transfer by way of a lease exchange, which is what appears to be happening between Target and Zellers.  That means that if Target takes the lease on one of the unionized Zellers’ stores, it will be bound by the collective agreement with the UFCW.  However, if Target does not take the unionized Zellers, it will not have legal responsibility for the employees there or the collective agreements.  HBC, which owns Zellers, says it may keep some of the stores not purchased by Target open under the Zellers banner, for a while.
Like Wal-Mart, Target is fiercely anti-union.  It has over 1400 U.S. stories, and not one is unionized, according to the NGO CorpWatch.   Like Wal-Mart, Target pays minimum wage or slightly above, yet earns billions of dollars in annual profits.  This is not a high-end employer.
Wal-Mart came to Canada in 1994 in a similar way.  It purchased 122 of  144 Woolco stores.  Of the 22 stores it did not purchase were the only 10 unionized stores.
So, does anyone want to put some money down on whether the unionized Zellers will be picked up by Target?
If you have insight into this, please pass it along by leaving a comment.
 

2 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is the Director of the School of HRM at York and Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and on the Advisory Board of the Osgoode Certificate program in Labour Law. He is a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program and a member of the International Advisory Committee on Harvard University’s Clean Slate Project, which is re-imaging labor law for the 21st century

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
City of Toronto Committee Votes to Fire 300 Workers, Chastises Right to Strike
next post
Newsflash: SCC to Release Fraser v. Ontario Today!

You may also like

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

A Successful Strike Vote is All That Stands...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Putin Invites Trump to Moscow for Second Meeting...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 218 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
8h

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211852Twitter 1364627677785821185
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
8h

Here's my latest in @jacobinmag.

If Ontario's labor laws applied in Alabama, the Amazon vote would have been held months ago so workers could get back to their jobs. Instead, the NLRA permits Amazon to conduct a months' long onslaught of anti-union propaganda. https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1364613560425275392

Jacobin@jacobinmag

Amazon workers in Alabama are voting on whether to unionize, but the company is bombarding them with anti-union propaganda. In Canada, by contrast, votes are held quickly, making it harder for companies to stack the deck — a model that can work in the US. http://jacobinmag.com/2021/02/amazon-alabama-canada-labor-law-union-vote

Reply on Twitter 1364623976174092316Retweet on Twitter 13646239761740923168Like on Twitter 136462397617409231613Twitter 1364623976174092316
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
9h

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364605259071561730Retweet on Twitter 13646052590715617304Like on Twitter 13646052590715617304Twitter 1364605259071561730
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.