Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
Law of Work Archive

City of Toronto Committee Votes to Fire 300 Workers, Chastises Right to Strike

by David Doorey April 27, 2011
written by David Doorey April 27, 2011

The City of Toronto’s new Mayors (there are two mayors in practice–elected Mayor Rob and his Councillor brother Doug, who acts like he’s the mayor) was elected recently on a mandate of little more than a promise to cut spending and contract out unionized jobs.  That was about the extent of the political vision offered, but it was enough to get him elected.  Yesterday, a committee stacked with the Mayor’s supporters voted 4-2 to terminate some 300 unionized garbage collectors and put their jobs up for tender to the private sector.
For my HR students who learn about how to properly evaluate  employees and treat them “fairly”, note that these employees are losing their jobs not because they are poor workers–the employer has done no evaluation of their work whatsoever.  The City politicians have promised to get rid of unionized public sector jobs and argue that they can find people willing to do their jobs for less money, so they’re gone.
The Cost Debate
The Mayors and their supporters argue that this process will save the City “$8 million” per year.  That is a matter of some faith, since a variety of studies show that public garbage collection works  out to be cheaper than private garbage collection.  As is typical, organizations known to be against unions and government (like the C.D. Howe Institute and the Board of Trade) not surprisingly conclude that private garbage collection is cheaper, and organizations that favour strong government services find the opposite.
Here is a CUPE study showing public garbage collection is cheaper.
Here is a C.D. Howe study showing public garbage collection is more expensive.
You can pick the study that best suites your ideology.   That’s what politicians do.  Five years from now, we will still be debating whether the contracting out saved the City any money, because the answer will depend on debates about how to calculate the cost and/or savings.  I live in the area where garbage is being contracted out to the lowest bidder, so I will let you know if my service improves or gets worse.
The Sad State of Political Discourse
The right to strike is one of the key features that distinguishes democracies from dictatorships.  The recent fall of the Egyptian regime was due in large measure to the bravery of striking workers, who put their safety and livelihood on the line to fight for democracy.  Canada is a signatory to international human rights instruments that require governments to respect a right to strike of all workers, subject only to a few narrow exceptions relating to police, military, and jobs that protect health and safety.  You get the idea.  The right to strike is an important democratic principle steeped in long history. Here is a nice piece by Professor Servais from the Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal explaining the importance of the right to strike in international law.
At yesterday’s council meeting, Councillors mocked and chastised CUPE workers who had the audacity to exercise their legal right to strike.  Some, like Councillor Nunziata and Councillor Mommoliti felt that the legal CUPE garbage strike last year was relevant to the decision to contract out the CUPE jobs.  Nunziata mocked union members, suggesting that evidence of their poor performance was found in the decision to strike:

“Is providing good customer service going on strike for five weeks and having residents with garbage on their front lawns?” asked Ms. Nunziata, to hisses from an audience

The message is clear from our elected officials.  Although you have a legal right to strike–as will the employees of whatever private company wins the bid–you should never actually exercise that right, and if you do, this government will punish you for it.  If an employer threatened its workers with contracting out if they go on strike, that would be a breach of Section 72 of the Labour Relations Act. Nunziata’s comments are more mocking than threatening given the context.  But the comments by Nunziata and the other anti-union Councillors who explained the decision to terminate unionized workers by referencing last years’ strike are highly inappropriate and unprofessional.   They run completely counter to the policy expressed in the Labour Relations Act, which is intended to ensure workers that they will not be punished for exercising their legal rights.
Don’t you find the mocking, sarcastic tone of the Councillors, who have just sent 3oo of their employees to the unemployment line, extremely distasteful?   Three hundred Toronto families just received devastating news.  When did mass firings become a reason for celebration?
Unfortunately, the level of political discourse in Toronto has fallen into the garbage heap.
Is there a grievance in the works?
Lastly, the CUPE president hinted yesterday that the City may have violated the collective agreement in the manner in which it has implemented the contracting out so far.  Mark Ferguson said this:

“I know how the collective agreement operates and what the past practices have been in the delivery of information.  If you want to change those past practices I would suggest you do so at the bargaining table and not midway through a collective agreement.”

Hhmmm.  This sounds like a set up for a grievance alleging a change in past practice that violates the agreement.  I don’t know what that is about.  But we will keep our ears to the ground.  Can anyone at CUPE provide us with any insight into this issue?

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is the Director of the School of HRM at York and Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and on the Advisory Board of the Osgoode Certificate program in Labour Law. He is a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program and a member of the International Advisory Committee on Harvard University’s Clean Slate Project, which is re-imaging labor law for the 21st century

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
NFL Ordered to End Lockout. What Does it Mean?
next post
Will Target Canada Buy the Unionized Zellers?

You may also like

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

A Successful Strike Vote is All That Stands...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Putin Invites Trump to Moscow for Second Meeting...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 218 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
4h

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211852Twitter 1364627677785821185
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
4h

Here's my latest in @jacobinmag.

If Ontario's labor laws applied in Alabama, the Amazon vote would have been held months ago so workers could get back to their jobs. Instead, the NLRA permits Amazon to conduct a months' long onslaught of anti-union propaganda. https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1364613560425275392

Jacobin@jacobinmag

Amazon workers in Alabama are voting on whether to unionize, but the company is bombarding them with anti-union propaganda. In Canada, by contrast, votes are held quickly, making it harder for companies to stack the deck — a model that can work in the US. http://jacobinmag.com/2021/02/amazon-alabama-canada-labor-law-union-vote

Reply on Twitter 1364623976174092316Retweet on Twitter 13646239761740923167Like on Twitter 136462397617409231612Twitter 1364623976174092316
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
6h

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364605259071561730Retweet on Twitter 13646052590715617304Like on Twitter 13646052590715617304Twitter 1364605259071561730
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.