The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

The Women in My Courses Will Earn 63% of the Men. Fair?

by David Doorey September 8, 2010
written by David Doorey September 8, 2010

A new study shows that Canadian women with post secondary education earn only 63 percent of what men with similar qualifications earn.  Here is the Globe and Mail story. For the women in my class, look around.  Are the men here worth more than you?  Consider too that women outperform men in university, by 18%!  What can explain this apparent discrepancy between qualifications and performance and earnings?

The report shows that Canadian women posted better academic achievements than men at all levels – in high school, women have a graduation rate 8 per cent higher than men, which rises to 11 per cent for college programs and 18 per cent for university degrees. However, women with a postsecondary education still earned on average just 63 per cent of the salary of similarly educated men, up only slightly from 61 per cent in 1998. The number is identical for women with only a high-school education.

The gender pay gap is a topic of great debate. I’ve noted studies before.  Human rights and pay equity legislation in Canada seeks to address the gap by targeting gender discrimination.  It assumes that a major cause of the pay gap is overt or systemic discrimination by employers in pay and employment practices, and that laws can overcome that discrimination.  See, for example, the resources at the Equal Pay Coalition website and this nice overview paper by Toronto lawyer Mary Cornish. However, despite many of years of legislative initiatives, a large pay gap remains.
Others argue that women are paid less because their productivity justified a lower pay.  The argument is that women (1) chose careers that pay less (they are nurses and social workers rather than engineers and miners); (2) they work fewer hours than men because they have greater family responsibilities; and (3) they experience greater career interruptions due to childbirth and care, and this slows their income trajectory.  I noted in an earlier post that women who have children earn less than childless women. Here is a series of short You-Tube videos of a talk by speaker Warren Farrel who writes books arguing that women earn less for the three reasons I just listed.  He also argues that women have more rounded and balanced lives than men, but that this comes at a cost in terms of employment earnings.   He believes, therefore, that legal rules that try to eliminate the pay gap are wrong-headed and doomed to fail.
Do you think that pay gap is a social problem that the state should be trying to address through legal regulation?

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Don't Mess With 60 Year Old Retirement Date in France
next post
Are You Prepared to Work 10 Hour Days for $2.50 Per Hour?

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

TheLawofWork Follow

@ ·
now

Reply on Twitter Retweet on Twitter Like on Twitter Twitter
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.