The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Are You Prepared to Work 10 Hour Days for $2.50 Per Hour?

by David Doorey September 10, 2010
written by David Doorey September 10, 2010

This term I’m teaching Industrial Relations, and there was a nice piece in the Toronto Star back in July to get us going.  The story described how some new immigrants to Canada are working 10 hour days and earning about $2.50 per hour  for sleazy employers in Toronto’s Chinatown area. Some also paid the employers a fee for the privilege of this employment. Is this a social problem in need of state intervention, or just the outcome of free bargaining between employers and employees?
We have a minimum wage in Ontario (it’s $10.25 per hour this year), and  $2.50 is obviously much lower

Exploitation in Chinatown

Exploitation in Chinatown


than that standard.   So the first lesson in this story is that employers do not always obey employment laws. In fact, we know from studies that employment standards laws in particular have a high level of non-compliance in Canada.  As Harry Arthurs says, “law is what law does”.  That reminds us that what matters is how actors respond to legal signals, not what the law “on the books” says.   The fact that we have a minimum wage doesn’t mean that the employers always pay it.  There is an enforcement and compliance problem.
But neo-classical economists are usually against the minimum wage (and laws regulating hours of work, human rights, et cetera too)  in any event.  State intervention in the “free” negotiation of employment contract is said to distort the natural equilibrium of the labour market, causing inefficiencies that actually harm both the employer and the employee.  If employees in Chinatown are prepared to work 10 hour days for $2.50 per hour, and the employer can attract sufficient workers at that rate, then that is the proper wage rate.  If the state tries to interject by ordering the employer to pay $10.25 per hour, the employer will just hire fewer workers (causing unemployment), or pass along the added cost to consumers (raising the cost of living), or they will just ignore the law altogether (as in this example).  In the words of  neo-classical law and economics professor Richard Epstein:

The minimum wage law, with its redistributive impulse, seeks to impose costs on one side of the relationship but ignores the private responses to the challenge, and so ends up hurting both sides. (Simple Rules for a Complex World, p. 145)

You can also watch the Guru of this world view, Milton Friedman, explain why the minimum wage is evil in this You-Tube video. The fact that new immigrants to Toronto likely don’t speak English, have no knowledge of the legal system, and are desperate for any source of income to feed themselves is assumed by people like Epstein not to pose a problem for the legal model they espouse.  In his view, employers like this who are not nice to their employees will be driven out of business by the forces of the market, since they will not be able to keep good workers, and word will get out that they are bad employers.  Soon, they will not be able to attract any decent workers, and their inefficiencies will drive them out of business.
Canadian governments have largely rejected these arguments.  Governments of all political stripes have historically supported employment regulation to “protect workers” from the harsh realities of the free labour market in which the employer so obviously holds the upper hand.  Governments have seen this imbalance of bargaining power as a social problem in need of a legal response.  That response has come in two forms:

(1) employment standards regulations (like employment standards, human rights codes, pay equity, occupational health and safety, workers compensation, etc); and

(2) collective bargaining laws that establish a system that allows workers to join together and bargain with their employers as a group so as to create a more level bargaining ground.

Industrial relations is the study of how these rules interact with labour markets and the industrial relations “actors” (employees, employers, unions, and the state) to produce  employment-related outcomes.  As we will see in my course, we are dealing with a virtual spider’s web of balancing,  tensions, and conflicts.  When we pull on one string, it provokes a chain reaction of cause and effects throughout the web.  That’s what makes the study of industrial relations so interesting.

  • If we think $2.50 per hour is “too low”, how can we ensure employers pay more?  The mininum wage law isn’t working.
  • Should we just repeal the minimum wage law, and let the markets dictate?
  • Should we change how our minimum wage laws work, to try and ensure better compliance? (I have argued we should, by making it easier for workers to unionize when their employer violates the employment standards act. Do you agree with that idea?)
  • Should we encourage those workers to unionize so they have professional help and collective power in their negotiations?   If so, how do we do that?
  • What impact will unionization have on the workplace?

These are the sorts of questions we will explore as we begin our foray into the study of industrial relations

2 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
The Women in My Courses Will Earn 63% of the Men. Fair?
next post
Should Toronto Hotel Workers Leave the Film Festival Stranded?

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
7h

If one these dimwits was a Sacha Baron Cohen-like comedian playing the role of a Republican would any one notice?

PatriotTakes 🇺🇸@patriottakes

Marjorie Taylor Greene believes generating electricity from “wind turbines and solar panels” will result in the loss of air conditioning and home appliances.

Greene: “I like the lights on. I want to stay up later at night. I don’t want to have to go to bed when the sun sets.”

Reply on Twitter 1558630572783722497Retweet on Twitter 15586305727837224972Like on Twitter 15586305727837224974Twitter 1558630572783722497
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
10h

A student told me she is translating chapters of my book into Korean because she learned a lot and wants it as a reference but English is her second language.

Any Korean speakers out there? What does this say?

일의 법칙

Reply on Twitter 1558595466182393858Retweet on Twitter 1558595466182393858Like on Twitter 1558595466182393858Twitter 1558595466182393858
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
10h

I have no idea who this person is or what is going on in Peterborough.

There’s a world of crazy around me that I’m missing.

Caryma Sa'd - Lawyer + Political Satirist@CarymaRules

Romana Didulo provides entertainment for the thinned out crowd in the form of her favourite song, Rasputin.

#cdnpoli #Peterborough #QAnon

Reply on Twitter 1558592062097956865Retweet on Twitter 1558592062097956865Like on Twitter 15585920620979568653Twitter 1558592062097956865
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.