The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Rash of Sick Pilots Confronts Air Canada. Is this a "strike"?

by David Doorey March 17, 2012
written by David Doorey March 17, 2012

Not that anyone cares, but us labour law types have been telling the media for months that the government’s constant interference in collective bargaining is counter-productive from an employee relations’ perspective.  Minister Raitt’s refusal to permit strikes and lockouts and instead channelling employee frustrations into a process the Minister has stacked in favour of employers is a recipe for a very unhappy and unhealthy workplace.  Years of industrial relations scholarship suggests that employee frustration does not go away just because a government prohibits workers from exercising rights to vent steam that most other people have.  Rather, those frustrations can take other forms that are not healthy for the business.  That might mean a less motivated workforce, more grievances, or higher absenteeism, for example.
News reports today indicate that some Air Canada pilots, whose right to engage in a work stoppage has been suspended by the government, have called in sick, causing the airline to cancel flights. Some of the pilots are claiming stress and fatigue.  If workers are banned from striking, can they call in sick?  If small percentage of workers call in sick, are they engaged in a ‘strike’?
Read how the Canada Labour Code defines a ‘strike’:

“strike” includes a cessation of work or a refusal to work or to continue to work by employees, in combination, in concert or in accordance with a common understanding, and a slowdown of work or other concerted activity on the part of employees in relation to their work that is designed to restrict or limit output;

What do you think?  Are the pilots who called in sick on “strike”?  We don’t know, right?  Why do I say that?  What does the answer depend upon?
Whether or not this is a strike, it is none of the Minister’s business.  What constitutes a strike is a question clearly dealt with by the Canada Labour Code, and not a particularly complex question at that.  The Code provides employers that believe their employees are engaged in an unlawful strike with a remedy.  In other words, this is standard labour law question that comes up fairly regularly.  Yet I wonder whether this Minister, this government, would be able to resist sticking its nose into the issue if pilots continued to experience symptoms.  I wonder, for example, whether the Minister might attempt to influence the Labour Board by making comments about whether she thinks it is a strike, or about what she thinks the labour board should decide, were the employer to bring an illegal strike application.
Do you think that it would be inappropriate for a Mininster to suggest to an administrative tribunal how it shoudl decide a legal dispute within it’s jurisdiction?
How would you respond if you were Air Canada? One option is to see this as a sign of great tension and conflict, no doubt aggravated by the government’s intervention, including its non-neutral arbitration process in the back to work legislation.  If you were the Director of Labour Relations for Air Canada, would you offer the union the opportunity to refer the issues to a fair and neutral private interest arbitration system, rather than the government’s distorted version, with an arbitrator agreed to by the parties and that does not include a list of mandatory criteria limiting the arbitrator’s discretion?  Do you think would be perceived as an olive branch to the workers?

4 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Voices at Work Conference this Weekend at Osgoode Hall
next post
Can Calling in 'Fatigued' Be Unlawful Strike When Law Prohibits Working While 'Fatigued'?

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
josheidelson Josh Eidelson @josheidelson ·
6h

Scoop: Labor Board prosecutors have concluded Starbucks illegally refused to fairly negotiate at dozens of newly-unionized cafes across the country https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-28/starbucks-illegally-refused-to-bargain-on-zoom-nlrb-lawyer-says Starbucks’ refusal to negotiate if some workers participated via Zoom was illegal, NLRB general counsel says

Reply on Twitter 1640509028567506950 Retweet on Twitter 1640509028567506950 145 Like on Twitter 1640509028567506950 429 Twitter 1640509028567506950
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
alexisshotwell Alexis Shotwell @alexisshotwell ·
11h

This morning the president of @Carleton_U sent out a note underlining his understanding of “how painful labour disruptions can be to communities,” pleading for us to be calm and respectful and to support our students at the end of term. 1/

Reply on Twitter 1640430514627551256 Retweet on Twitter 1640430514627551256 86 Like on Twitter 1640430514627551256 245 Twitter 1640430514627551256
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
13h

Oh fun.

‘AI is on the cusp of taking control: This is how it may all go wrong’

https://apple.news/AWvPXyT8WTVOs5byQvVk-3Q

Reply on Twitter 1640408084093779989 Retweet on Twitter 1640408084093779989 1 Like on Twitter 1640408084093779989 3 Twitter 1640408084093779989
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.