The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Ontario's Latest Study on the Minimum Wage To Release Report Today: Some Background

by David Doorey January 27, 2014
written by David Doorey January 27, 2014

Yet another government study of the minimum wage is set to be released today.  This one is chaired by my friend and colleague Anil Verma of the

Professor Verma chaired the Minimum Wage Task Force

Professor Verma chaired the Minimum Wage Task Force


University of Toronto.    Professor Verma was asked to recommend a process for setting the minimum wage moving forward.  It is not expected that the panel will make a recommendation about whether the existing minimum wage  should be raised immediately.  The basic minimum wage has been $10.25 per hour since March 31, 2010.  Low wage worker advocates have been pushing for a raise to $14 per hour.
Media outlets are reporting today that the main recommendation from the panel will be to raise the minimum wage annually in accordance with the inflation rate.  Activists are generally happy with that model as a process for moving forward.  It aims to maintain relative wages for Ontario’s lowest paid workers. However, the question of where the initial rate should be set remains a matter of contention.  The activists argue that shift to indexing should be pegged initially at the $14 per hour level, which they argue puts a full time worker slightly above the ‘poverty rate’. Rumour has it the panel will recommend fixing the new rate immediately based on indexing to inflation rate as of 2010, when the $10.25 basic rate began.
The statutory minimum wage in Canada dates from 1917 in Alberta.  By the 1920s, every jurisdiction in Canada had some form of wage fixing legislation.  The first law in Ontario was the Minimum Wage Act of 1920, which assigned the role of setting a basic weekly minimum wage for women to a 5 person board.   Early minimum wage legislation applied only to women, and aimed to fix a wage allowing for basic subsistence for a single woman, assuming no dependents or need to save.  Minimum wage laws became more common after World War I, as women played a greater role in the labour market, concerns about Bolshevism spreading in response to growing poverty, religious organizations promoted the need for decent treatment of workers, and trade unions became concerned about competition from ‘cheap women workers’.  Advocates of a minimum wage argued that it was needed to protect the health of women for reproductive purposes, and also to improve productivity and purchasing power.  Minimum wage regulation later spread to men, though women continue to more represented in minimum wage jobs than men.  See who makes the minimum wage in this report by the Wellesley Institute.
From the beginning of government legislation in the area of wages, employer groups have made the same counter arguments in opposition.  In a great piece by Professor McCallum (Keeping Women in their Place: The Mininum Wage in Canada, 1910-25, (1986) 17 Labour/Le Travail 29-56), the Canadian Manufacturers Association’s position in 1917 is recounted.  The CMA argued that minimum wage legislation is ‘economically unsound’ and would “adversely affect the interests of the very people it is designed to help” and cause unemployment.  I noted in an earlier post that the argument that laws intended to help the poor will actually harm the poor has been a staple of reactionary politics for over 200 years.  Albert Hirschman called this the Perversity Argument in his great book the The Rhetoric of Reaction.  It remains a core pillar of the business argument against the minimum wage and every attempt to raise it.  The argument is captured famously in this clip by godfather of neoliberal economic theory, Milton Friedman:

You can find the same basic line of reasoning against the minimum wage in the reports of modern day business associations.  For example, check out the report of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, arguing against minimum wage hikes.
As is often the case with regulations governing work, economists and industrial relations scholars do not agree on the affects of minimum wages.  For every study claiming that minimum wage increases are overall harmful to low wage workers and cause job losses, there is a study showing that minimum wage increases reduce poverty and have no net negative impact on overall jobs in an economy.  Politicians cherry pick which studies support their policy position.  Harry Arthurs, Canada’s leading work law scholar and Chair of the federal government’s review of employment standards (Fairness at Work), responded to this perennial disagreement amongst economists over the affects of minimum wages by diverting the debate away from economics:

 “In the end, however, the argument over a national minimum wage is not about politics or economics.  It is about decency.  Just as we reject most forms of child labour on ethical grounds, whatever their economic attractions, we recoil from the notion that in an affluent society like ours good, hard-working people should have to live in abject poverty”. (p. 247)

 
Issues for Discussion
Should the Ontario government accept the arguments of worker advocates that the minimum wage should be immediately raised to $14 per hour?
Do you believe arguments of the employers, economists like Milton Friedman, and those on political right that raising the minimum wage will ultimately harm poor people and increase unemployment?  If so, why do you believe this?  Is it because you have read the economic studies from both sides of the debate, or just because it makes sense to you?
How should a government decide what impact raising the minimum wage will have when economists cannot agree?

2 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
U of T Study Find Canadian Managers are MORE Hostile to Unions than American
next post
B.C. Government Violates Freedom of Association (Again): Ordered to Pay $2 Million in Damages

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

TheLawofWork Follow

@ ·
now

Reply on Twitter Retweet on Twitter Like on Twitter Twitter
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.