The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

The Two Sides of the Minimum Wage Debate: Friedman v. Kennedy

by David Doorey May 3, 2013
written by David Doorey May 3, 2013

moin wageWhen the last Ontario Budget came down, and included a continued freeze of the base minimum wage at $10.25 per hour.  This has angered poverty activists, and no doubt pleased the business lobby.  Now the government has launched another committee to study the minimum wage, appointing my colleague in the academy, Anil Verma to chair it.
I like to show two clips in class when I discuss the mininum wage.
The first is of Milton Friedman, godfather of the law and economics school, arguing that the minimum wage has no benefits whatsoever, and in fact makes everyone worse off, even the people who receive it.  It’s a dated clip, but the arguments made by the anti-minimum wage folks is exactly the same today as it was in the 1960s.

Friedman deploys here what Albert Hirschman called the “Perversity Thesis” in his fantastic book called The Rhetoric of Reaction.  Hirschman argues that reactionary arguments for over 200 years have followed the same line of reasoning.  The Perversity Thesis posits that any attempt to improve social or economic life will actually produce the opposite result from what is intended.  Hence, Friedman’s claim is that trying to help the poor by introducing a minimum wage will actually make the poor worse off.
The Friedman claim that the effects of the minimum wage are wholly negative is hotly disputed, and not supported by empirical evidence.  The true story is much more nuanced.  Most researchers believe that the minimum wage does have a small negative effect on employment of young people.  However, there can be no dispute that the minimum wage does put more money in the hands of some people, and that extra income stimulates spending, which has positive economic effects. The question is whether the ‘negative’ effects outweigh the ‘positive’ effects.  Economists won’t ever agree on this.
Economist Jim Stanford of the CAW and author of Economics for Everyone says this:

In practice, the effect of minimum wages on employment is probably a wash.  Gradual increases in minimum wages, within reasonable bounds, have virtually no impact on employment at all, in either direction.  So long as levels are set realistically relative to productivity and profitability, minimum wages can be increased with no measurable damage to employment.

The second clip is of Senator Ted Kennedy in the U.S. Senate advocating for a small raise in the mininum wage.  He obviously doesn’t buy Friedman’s argument.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is a Full Professor of Work Law and Labour Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Saskatchewan's Bill 85: When Ideology Trumps Good Sense?
next post
Target Violates U.S. Labour Laws in Attempts to Thwart Union Organizing Campaign

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018


Follow Us On Social Media

Substack
Bluesky

BlueSky Latest Posts

No posts available.

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Tax Law
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.