The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Employment RegulationHuman RightsLaw of Work ArchiveWrongful Dismissal

A Reporter Asked Me if Employers Should Have Masturbation Rooms

by David Doorey January 14, 2017
written by David Doorey January 14, 2017

I get a lot of media inquiries on matters of work law and industrial relations, but the latest caught me off guard.  I was busy catching up on emails and listening to voicemails in the background when I heard something like the following:

Professor Doorey, I’m looking for a comment on the growing trend of masturbation at work and how an employer might go about developing a masturbation policy.

I looked up from my computer.  At first I thought this might be a gag being played on me by a friend, like one of those crank call morning radio gags.  But the reporter then sent a follow up email.  It linked to a story from England that cited a psychology professor who argued that masturbation breaks would improve productivity and relieve workplace stress.  If true, then does that suggest that employers should consider encouraging masturbation breaks at the office?

Hhhhmmm.

Of course, as a lawyer and law prof, I come at the issue through a legal lens, and my first thought was that a “masturbation room” at work would almost certainly result in complaints by employees who find the whole idea icky.  Imagine a coworker saying “I’m stepping out for a few minutes to masturbate, be right back”.   It’s a short walk from that to complaints about sexual harassment and poisoned work environment.

My advice to the reporter is set out in the resulting article published by VICE.  I suggested a gym and encouragement of brief mini-work outs through the day is probably a smarter idea for employers.  Similar benefits, without all the messiness.

Pun intended.

David Doorey, “A Reporter Asked Me if Employers Should Have Masturbation Rooms” Canadian Law of Work Forum (January 14 2017): https://lawofwork.ca/masturbationrooms

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Law of Work Blog Enters the Canadian Law Blog 'Hall of Fame'
next post
This Blog is Under Construction

You may also like

Is Memorial University Illegally Preventing Workers from Joining...

February 2, 2023

What Might a Right to Strike for Non-Union...

December 16, 2022

Lessons for the Railway Showdown from a Victory...

November 30, 2022

Why Gig Workers Are NOT Independent Contractors: A...

September 19, 2022

CUPW’s Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Against Uber Raises...

September 16, 2022

Reforming Non-Compete Law: A Cross Border Perspective

March 3, 2022

The Problem With Ontario’s Proposed Gig Worker Law...

February 28, 2022

Can Human Rights Law Help Workers Fired for...

February 18, 2022

Will Conservatives Add “Vaccine Status” to Human Rights...

February 9, 2022

Is UFCW’s Mysterious “Agreement” With Uber Lawful?

January 27, 2022

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

TheLawofWork Follow

@ ·
now

Reply on Twitter Retweet on Twitter Like on Twitter Twitter
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.