The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

100 Prominent Canadian Academics on the Employee Free Choice Act

by David Doorey July 16, 2009
written by David Doorey July 16, 2009

I mentioned a while back the concern a number of Canadian scholars had expressed about the misuse and mischaracterization of Canadian labour law and industrial relations in the ongoing debate about labour law reform in the United States.  Some opponents of the proposed Employee Free Choice Act have argued that the higher unionization rates in Canada has caused unemployment here.  That linkage is a stretch, to put it mildly.
Here is a list of prominent Canadian scholars that have endorsed a letter refuting the claim by some opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act that relatively better labour laws in Canada and the higher unionization rate here are somehow a ’cause’ of unemployment.  The letter also warns against the misuse and mischaracterization of Canadian law and statistics in the American labour reform debates.
Notably, Canada ranks considerably higher than the U.S. on all important measures of poverty and income equality.  In other words, in the U.S., which is virtually union-free at under 10% union density, income inequality is the highest of all advanced economic nations. That  is, the vast majority of wealth goes to a relatively small percentage of Americans.  That is the statistic that President Obama has used to explain his desire to rebuild the American labor movement, since unions do usually manage to bargain a greater share of the pie for workers.  What opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act have still failed to explain is how they would address the shameful income disparity in the richest country on the planet.  Their answer appears to be ‘stay the course’, allow collective bargaining to mostly disappear, and rely even more on the ‘free labour market’ without government regulation.
Is that an acceptable solution to the problem?  Or is vast income disparity not a problem at all?  Note that the country with the lowest income inequality, Denmark, also happens to have among the highest unionization rates in the world, and, by the way, the Dannish are also perennially found to be happiest people on the planet in those sorts of surveys. Professor MIchael Lynk recently discussed the link between income inequality and unionization in his Rand Memorial Lecture.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is a Full Professor of Work Law and Labour Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Now THAT'S a Labour Protest!
next post
Media and the Toronto Strike

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018


Follow Us On Social Media

Substack
Bluesky

BlueSky Latest Posts

No posts available.

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Tax Law
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.