The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

York Strike and the Politics and Spin of Interest Arbitration Offers

by David Doorey November 13, 2008
written by David Doorey November 13, 2008

A well-written student run blog on the York strike was just brought to my attention.  If you haven’t seen it, its called York Strike 2008.
A particularly interesting part of the blog deals with the question of interest arbitration.  I mentioned early on in this strike that ‘interest arbitration’ is always an option, but only if both parties consent to it.  This is dealt with in Section 40 of the Ontario Labour Relations Act.   In this strike, it is the employer pushing hard for interest arbitration and the union is resisting.   York Strike 2008 blog dug up notes from the 1997 round of bargaining with YUFA.  In that bargaining round, York U. argued strenuously against interest arbitration on a principled basis.  Here’s a key passage of the employer’s argument against interest arbitration then:

Arbitration risks handing over the future of the institution, and the definition of a new contract for faculty, to a third party who cannot possibly appreciate the subtleties and complexities of a university such as York. University administrators and faculty must determine an effective contract and its budgetary implications through collective bargaining. Engaging in arbitration on these issues is tantamount to allowing an outsider who has no continuing interest in, or commitment to, the University to have the authority to decide academic priorities for the institution. The arbitrator, unlike faculty and administration, is not accountable for making his or her decision work. Arbitrators do not have to find the money to meet the costs of their judgements, nor must they live with the impact of their decisions.

This Toronto Star article from 1997 describes an incident in which the faculty union presented the administration with a mock “DBA”, Doctor of Binding Arbitration.  But the employer refused arbitration.
The point is this:  In labour relations, the party that thinks interest arbitration will work for them often pushes for interest arbitration, and then uses the other side’s refusal in its public relations propaganda.  In 1997, it was the union seeking arbitration to end a strike, this time its the employer.

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Davies v. Fraser Collection: Is a Temporary Layoff of a Nonunion Employee a Constructive Dismissal?
next post
Top 10 SSRN Labour & Employment Law Articles (Nov 15)

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 335 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
12h

And my nephew.

Doug Ford@fordnation

Today, I had the pleasure of introducing my new cabinet, an experienced team that will deliver on our plan to build Ontario. #ONpoli 4

Reply on Twitter 1540489820304072704Retweet on Twitter 1540489820304072704Like on Twitter 15404898203040727042Twitter 1540489820304072704
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
17h

I’m sure Mr Ford Jr. is the most qualified among Conservative MPPs on multiculturalism.

Reminds me of that dude with the stash in Alberta who is Minister for Women’s Issues.

Dennis Buchanan@LawyerBuchanan

I'm mostly surprised that Doug didn't just create a new role and portfolio for the Minister of My Nephew Wants a Cabinet Salary. https://twitter.com/robferguson1/status/1540367169753649153

Reply on Twitter 1540408905737674752Retweet on Twitter 1540408905737674752Like on Twitter 15404089057376747523Twitter 1540408905737674752
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
21h

My new @DalhousieLJ article is ready to go, examining how 4 Canadian provinces (Ontario, Alberta, NS, PEI) have persisted with a 1940s era law excluding lawyers & other professionals from #CollectiveBargaining legislation.

Clear #Charter violation. Yet the exclusions persist.

Reply on Twitter 1540350048122425345Retweet on Twitter 15403500481224253454Like on Twitter 15403500481224253458Twitter 1540350048122425345
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.