The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

The TTC Strike Ban Legislation

by David Doorey February 23, 2011
written by David Doorey February 23, 2011

The Liberal government introduced the controversial ban on TTC strikes yesterday at the behest of Mayor Ford.   In doing so, the Liberals have opted to try and appease Toronto voters short of an upcoming election rather than protect the support it has mostly enjoyed the labour movement since coming to power.  Already the Ontario Federation of Labour is planning a “Day of Protest”.   As I’ve noted before, the labour movement sees this legislation as part of a reactionary anti-union platform of the Toronto Mayor, and there is anger that the Liberals would help push forward that agenda.  I’d expect the NDP to raise objections along these lines during the legislative debates.
Here is the Minister of Labour’s (Charles Sousa) introductory speech. And here is the Bill  that was introduced, which the government named Bill 150, An Act to provide for the resolution of labour disputes involving the Toronto Transit Commission. Section 15 says this:

Despite anything in the Labour Relations Act, 1995, employees to whom this Act applies shall not strike and the employer shall not lock them out.

Instead, any disputes not resolved in bargaining will go to an interest arbitrator who will listen to the parties’ submissions and then impose a collective agreement.  So, once this legislation passes, in the weird and whacky world of Toronto, a bus driver won’t be able to strike, but an ambulance driver will.  Go figure.
The Legal Battles Ahead?
Expect the International Labour Organization to issue a decision finding that this legislation violates Canada’s legal obligations under international human rights laws, since there is no doubt that a ban on transit workers’ right to strike violates ILO Convention 87, which Canada has ratified.  The ILO has already singled out, chastised, and expressed concern about Canada’s dismal compliance record with international labour rights, and this legislation will further harm Canada’s reputation and credibility at the ILO.
The next question is whether the unions will decide to launch a Charter challenge, asking the Courts to reconsider the 1987 Supreme Court decision that “freedom of association” does not include a right to strike.   The Supreme Court recently ruled in B.C. Health Services that it was wrong when it ruled back then that FA does not include a right to collective bargaining, and it also said that FA must protect at least the level of rights afforded by Convention 87.  If that is true, then FA must also include a right to strike.  Will the unions decide to bring this argument forward now?
If the Charter protects a right to strike, then in my opinion, this legislation would not be saved by Section 1. It is way too broad to satisfy the minimum impairment test in Section 1 of the Charter. It bans ALL strikes, by ANYemployee of the TTC, at ALL times!  The government’s argument is that a strike costs the “city of Toronto $50 million a day” [how many times have you heard that number recently…see my entry on this mysterious figure].   It’s a purely economic argument, and government concedes that most of the lost money is associated with people having difficulty getting to and from work at rush hour.
Why not use the “essential services” model we use for far more essential workers, like ambulance drivers, and allow for some TTC workers to be declared essential, enough to provide  a basic level of service, but allow others to strike.  This model has worked for transit workers in Quebec.  This is just one obvious possibility that springs to mine when thinking about a model that would address the government’s purely economic justification for this law, but there are no others.  If you are concerned about transit service for disabled people, then declare all special services for the disabled essential.
So we will watch if the unions decide to bring this case forward as a test to see if the Supreme Court still thinks governments should be able to ban strikes whenever it is politically popular to do so.
Other links:
Marcus Gee on why banning TTC strikes is a bad idea.
Toronto Star on why Province Should Ban TTC Right to Strike

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Langille on How the Protests in the Middle East Would Be Violations of Canadian Labour Law
next post
A TTC Strike Costs the City 50 MILLION DOLLARS a DAY!! And Other Myths …

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
2h

Looks great!

I took an international labor law course at LSE/Kings College taught by Keith Ewing, Brian Bercusson, Aileen McColgan, and Paul Davies.

Incredible course. And so important.

Desiree LeClercq@LeclercqDesiree

Excited to teach my new #internationallaborlaw course critically considering how labor rights are designed & enforced. The class balances decolonial theory w/ practical experiences. My syllabus (with names redacted) below. 1/

Reply on Twitter 1556698559650603008Retweet on Twitter 15566985596506030081Like on Twitter 15566985596506030086Twitter 1556698559650603008
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
2h

Remembering time I spoke at @SteelworkersCA conference. I joined International President Leo Gerard on an elevated platform stage.

Back leg of chair was off back of stage. Sat down and fell backyards off stage until Leo caught me, pulled me back up, muttering “fucking lawyers”

United Steelworkers #EverybodysUnion@SteelworkersCA

International President Tom Conway takes the stage for his keynote address 🔥🔥🔥 - a big welcome to the five thousand Steelworkers, together for the first time since the pandemic! #EverybodysUnion #1u 2

Reply on Twitter 1556696632082812929Retweet on Twitter 1556696632082812929Like on Twitter 15566966320828129295Twitter 1556696632082812929
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
2h

Yes I’m sure they would like to repeal human rights legislation but enact a new Freedom Protection Act that protects ‘rights’ they want, like anti-vaxer rights.

Sean O'Donnell@SJOLegal

@TheLawofWork Given that the Ford Government has stymied the HRTO for years, I don't think this crowd will see any joy through that avenue.

Reply on Twitter 1556695655120347141Retweet on Twitter 15566956551203471411Like on Twitter 15566956551203471413Twitter 1556695655120347141
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.