The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

With the New 'Ministry of Climate Change', It's Time for a 'Just Transitions Law'

by David Doorey June 25, 2014
written by David Doorey June 25, 2014

The announcement of the new Ontario Liberal government cabinet included one new item that caught my eye.  The Liberals have appointed Glen Murray as Minister of the renamed Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.   How governments respond to climate change (or fail to do so) has great significance for labour markets, business, workers, and unions.  Climate change will kill some industries and spawn new ones.  Millions of workers worldwide will be affected.  These are matters of great concern for labour law. Labour and environmental groups have had some success in forging common ground on ways forward to deal with climate change and still protect the economy. Environmental law scholars have proposed new legal fields like Climate Change Law, but they tend to ignore labour law and labour markets.  Surprisingly, labour law–its lawyers and academics–has so far had little to say about climate change, and law’s response to it.  Climate change law is considered to fall within the boundaries of environmental law and

Just Transition Law as a New Legal Discipline?

Just Transition Law as a New Legal Discipline?


beyond the scope of the basic stuff of labour law, such as employment standards and collective bargaining law.    This perspective needs to change.
I’m working on a project that aims to bring environmental law, environmental justice law, and labour law together. It involves the development of a new legal field:  Just Transitions Law.  
The Birth of Legal Fields 
Legal disciplines are manufactured by legal scholars.  In Canada, labour law did not exist as a legal field until Bora Laskin decided in the 1940s to invent it, by cobbling together aspects of contracts, torts, administrative law, property, and criminal law that related in some way to work.  That movement spawned labour law courses and texts, specialist labour lawyers, and labour law chapters in bar associations.  It also led to new ways of thinking about law and workplace justice, because by studying labour law, we see patterns in the law that are missed when we treat the law of work as just random incidents of contracts, torts, and property.  Labour Law is not just descriptive (here are the laws), it is also normative (the laws should do this).  As my colleague Brian Langille has said, ‘labour law’ includes a theory of justice.
Environmental Law is an even newer invention.  It was created in the 1970s by scholars interested in how regulatory law interacts with environmental concerns like pollution.  It too involved an exercise of surveying the legal landscape for laws that influence ‘the environment’ and then cobbling them together under a common banner.  When we recognize new legal fields, we not only raise the profile and influence of lawyers, academics, and policy-makers in the field, but we also begin to see our legal world differently.  Problems and patterns before missed are now identified, as are new ways of addressing complex challenges through law.
Both labour law and environmental law involve balancing economic interests (more jobs) and social interests (decent jobs, cleaner environment). However, the two fields are not natural allies.  The social interests they seek can sometimes conflict.  For example, decent, high paying unionized jobs in coal mining and oil fields may satisfy labour law’s goal of producing decent jobs, but conflict with environmental law’s aim of a cleaner environment.  This is the foundation of the age-old ‘jobs versus the environment’ tension.
However, climate change brings the two legal fields together in interesting new ways.  A failure to respond to climate change through legal policy will severely damage the social objectives of both fields.  It threatens the future of decent jobs and of a clean environment.   A proper response to climate change must be concerned with both of these important policy objectives.  This can only be achieved if we bring together the lessons of labour law and environmental law, rather than continue to treat the fields as two solitudes, as distance relatives who rarely communicate except to squabble.  The way to do this is to remap the boundaries of legal disciplines as we did in the 1940s with labour law and the 1970s with environmental law.  The organizing theme of a new legal discipline would be “Just Transition”.
Just Transition is a concept initially developed by the labour movement to express the concept that the risks and benefits of transitioning to a lower carbon economy should be shared according to a theory of justice.  A ‘transition’ involves proper planning to shift towards a cleaner economic model, and law’s role in shaping that transition.  A ‘just’ transition demonstrates this move must be guided by a theory of justice that considers the distribution of harms and benefits through the transitional process.   The idea of a just transition has recently been co-opted by such organizations as the United Nations Environmental Program and the International Labour Organization.  However, the legal model that would implement a JT remains undeveloped.

“There appears to be an emerging framework that allows for a Just Transition to operate on several levels, ranging from the global-societal level down to workplaces and local communities. This framework is grounded in some well-established social practices in the face of job challenges, and is reflected in the ongoing work of the ILO, the trade unions, national and local governments, business and industry, and community-based organizations. However, it is a framework that has been structured around a principle and a goal. The principle holds that the costs and benefits of a transition to sustainability should be shared widely across society. The goal is to generalize this principle at the level of policy. Steps are being taken here and there to turn the Just Transition approach into reality, but there is still a long way to go before it becomes a policy norm.” 

United Nations Environmental Programme (p. 278)

Surprisingly, labour lawyers and scholars are still largely absent from these discussions.  Their voice could be instrumental, since we labour lawyers tend to know a little something about how law can be used to inject voice and social justice concerns into economic decisions.
Chapters in a Textbook on a Law of Just Transition?
Our new legal field Just Transition Law would reorganize existing legal boundaries in interesting new ways.  When we look at the legal landscape through the lens of ‘Just Transition”, what laws interest us?
Certainly, the traditionally issues dealt with in labour law would still be of interest, since labour laws are one of the legal levers we use to produce ‘decent’ jobs.  So too would we be interested in the core substance of environmental law (including water law, energy law, and climate change laws), which address such key measures as pollution and sustainability.  However, we would also be interested in a range of other legal areas as well. A non-exhaustive list of legal fields that would be engaged in a law of just transition would include:  tax law, property law, immigration law, corporate and securities laws, unemployment insurance laws, land use law, consumer law, Aboriginal Law, Constitutional Law, and Agricultural Law.  Of course,  not every law within these legal fields would concern Just Transition Law, just like not every property, contract, or administrative law interested the early pioneers of labour and environmental law. The initial challenge for Just Transition scholars would be to do this early mapping.  What parts of existing legal fields are properly included in a law of Just Transition.  The fathers (they were all men) of labour law and environmental law went through a similar exercise.
In doing this mapping, scholars would be guided by a theory of justice that recognizes that the risks, benefits, and harm flowing from climate change and law’s response to it will be unevenly distributed and that law should address this distribution.  Scholars can debate what that theory should be and what literature and theories to draw on.  For example, in a law journal paper I’m working on called Just Transitions Law, I have built on the work of Amartya Sen’s ‘human capabilities’ theory, among other theories, as a foundation for the new legal field.  But there is a wealth of opportunity for scholars to draw on other theories and approaches.
In my forthcoming book chapter [‘A Transnational Law of Just Transitions’ in A. Blackett and A. Trebilcock, eds., Research Handbook on Transnational Labour Law (Edward Elgar, forthcoming 2015], I summarize the mapping exercise that involved in the formative period of a Law of Just Transitions:

Hence, on a map of Just Transitions Law [JTL], we would find legal issues traditionally associated with such disparate legal fields as labour law, environmental law, environmental and climate justice, as well as aspects of other legal fields that impact directly on the process of transitioning from higher to lower carbon economies, such as energy, trade, property, human rights, corporate, tax, and immigration law. JTL would require a redrawing of legal boundaries of the sort that sometimes occurs in response to important changes that strain existing legal taxonomies.  The boundaries of JTL would be defined by: (1) its factual foundation (laws that influence the transitioning towards lower carbon emissions in response to climate change); and (2) its theory of justice (the pursuit of a ‘just’ and equitable distribution of benefits and costs associated with this transition).

We are in the early days of our discussion on Just Transition Law.  If you’re interested, let me know.  I hope to build a network, plan future conferences, and maybe a special journal volume in time.
In the meantime, I encourage our new Minister of Climate Change to have a drink with the Minister of Labour and to think about how their two portfolios would overlap if a policy objective were to pursue a Just Transition to a lower carbon economy.  They may find much to discuss.
 Questions for Discussion
Would you be interested in a university course called “Law of Just Transitions”?  What sorts of materials would you expect to read in that course?
Do you see any benefit in organizing a legal field called “Just Transitions Law”?
 
 

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Postcards from Wisconsin: Is this the Future of Labor Law in Ontario if the Conservatives Win?
next post
Walmart Violated Quebec Labour Laws in Closing Store During Bargaining

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
13h

A Nationwide Bargaining Unit to Fight Starbucks Is a Moon Shot Worth Trying

My latest on ⁦@jacobin⁩. https://jacobin.com/2022/08/starbucks-service-unions-nlrb-law-centralized-bargaining/

Reply on Twitter 1556339370461786112Retweet on Twitter 15563393704617861122Like on Twitter 155633937046178611211Twitter 1556339370461786112
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
17h

Luck is part of it for sure. Right time right place. True of a lot of jobs not just academia.

But in my experience sitting on lots of academic hiring committees, people selected have superior CVs. 60 applicants, one position. Not all luck. It’s a very competitive job market.

David Webster@dwebsterhist

I've been hired for 2 tenure track jobs and been on multiple committees, sent in more than 100 job applications, and done multiple interviews. Here is my thread 🛢
of job market advice for early career academics based on decades of experience:

1. Get lucky.

Reply on Twitter 1556285407817506817Retweet on Twitter 1556285407817506817Like on Twitter 15562854078175068171Twitter 1556285407817506817
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
6 Aug

Sunflowers!

Reply on Twitter 1556032894640037890Retweet on Twitter 1556032894640037890Like on Twitter 15560328946400378905Twitter 1556032894640037890
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.