The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Should Public Sector Workers Accept McGuinty's Wage Freeze?

by David Doorey August 31, 2010
written by David Doorey August 31, 2010

Things are starting to heat up with the McGuinty governments’ threat to freeze public sector wages until 2014.  Last week, several major unions representing public sector workers walked out of talks with the government claiming that the government was not “bargaining” at all.  The lead story in the Toronto Star today had the CAW leadership threatening that work stoppages could be the result if the government insists on the freeze.

McGuinty says simply that the government has no money:  “For the next two years, there’s no additional money available for compensation.”

Of course, anyone involved in labour relations knows that employers often cry poverty at the outset of collective bargaining.  Unions take those claims with a grain of salt.  On the other hand, occasionally employers mean it. Everyone knows that the Ontario economy took a big economic hit during in the past few years, and that the government had to inject a lot of money into the system.  So finances are tight, no doubt.
But there is an age old debate in public sector labour relations about whether government employees should be expected to absorb a financial hit every time a government’s policies leave it in financial difficulty.  Critics of public sector wage freezes point out that a government is not in the business of making a profit.  It’s job is to provide services.  And governments make choices about how to balance revenue collection (taxes) and service provision. So, for example, the Liberal government has introduced corporate tax cuts in recent years and brags about those cuts and Ontario’s relatively low corporate tax rate in its advertising materials.  (see website ad here and t.v. commercial here), and it pushed through a 25% salary increase for MPPs.
These are choices the government makes about what to do with its revenues, and they lead to less revenues in the government coffers to pay employee wages.   The point is that the government’s financial situation is largely the result of government policies and choices, and not the act of God.  The point was made very clearly a while back by one of Canada’s leading labour relations neutrals, Martin Teplisky, who refused to be restrcited in setting public sector wages in interest arbitrations by the governments’ persistent claims of poverty.

Tepliksy observed: “The reality is it is not a question of ability to pay.  It is a question of unwillingness to pay”

[M. Tepliksy, “Ability to Pay and the Independence of Arbitration: An Arbitrator’s Perspective” Labour Arbitration Yearbook]
You may or not agree with the government’s choices (granting tax cuts and MPP raises while demanding wage freezes by unionized public sector workers), and that is what politics and public debate is all about.  But it is easy to see why public sector unions do not accept the governments’ claims that “there is no money”.  Their retort is that, if there is no money, it is because you opted to spend the money in other places, or to reduce your revenues by giving out corporate tax cuts…but don’t expect public sector workers to fund MPP raises and corporate tax cuts by simply accepting your request for less money for them and their families.
Whose position do you find most convincing: the governments’ or the unions’?

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Can Hooters Require Servers to be "Slim and Fit"?
next post
Is Strengthening Union Rights Good or Bad for Society? Don't Ask the Economists.

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
18m

President Biden calls for passage of #PROAct

Act bans employer captive audience anti-union meetings;

Expands def of “employee” to capture essentially what we call “dependent contractors” in Canada;

Increase penalties for unfair labor practices;

Doesn’t adopt card-check.

Steven Greenhouse @greenhousenyt

President Biden: "I'm so sick and tired of companies breaking the law when workers are seeking to unionize"

Reply on Twitter 1623164729530191874 Retweet on Twitter 1623164729530191874 Like on Twitter 1623164729530191874 4 Twitter 1623164729530191874
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
4h

My fingers are just too big to play an A chord on the #guitar.

Otherwise I would be a rock star. This is the only thing holding me back.

Reply on Twitter 1623109078431027200 Retweet on Twitter 1623109078431027200 Like on Twitter 1623109078431027200 12 Twitter 1623109078431027200
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
4h

Not seen comparable stats for Canada.There are terminations, but also better laws in most Canadian jurisdictions, including

- remedial certification
- interim reinstatement
- card-check/quick votes

“1 in 5 workers in US is fired for organizing a union” https://onlabor.org/labor-law-reform-is-needed-for-unions-to-succeed/

Reply on Twitter 1623103873161330688 Retweet on Twitter 1623103873161330688 Like on Twitter 1623103873161330688 1 Twitter 1623103873161330688
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.