The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

See you in Florence!

by David Doorey May 21, 2011
written by David Doorey May 21, 2011

I’m off to the European University Institute in Florence for a conference on Transnational Business Governance Interactions: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Contexts and Practitioners’ Perspectives.
I’ll be talking about my draft paper that explores how norms of behaviour emerge within the debates and contestations between multi-stakeholder organizations concerned with supply chain labour practices, including the Fair Labor Association, Workers’ Rights Consortium, Fair Wear Foundation, the Ethical Trading Initiative and Social Accountability International.  All of these organizations attempt to influence how multinational corporations manage labour practices within their global supply chains.  They all have designed model codes of conduct, and offer various ways of monitoring compliance and reporting on results.   In fact, they compete with one another for credibility and support.  My paper explores how that competition takes place, and how some standards emerge and become embedded new norms through that contestation.
I focus in particular on the development of the “living wage” standard from a radical outlier in the labour codes debates to its current position as a normal expectation.  All of the major multistakeholder codes require some form of compliance with a living wage standard, except the Fair Labor Association, but even the FLA is about to adopt the standard into its revised code.  At York University, where I work, a new vendor code was just adopted that requires all companies supplying York branded items to pay their workers a “living wage”. That that living wage is is not explained, but to give you an idea, the Centre for Policy Alternatives recently pegged the living wage for Toronto at $16.60 per hour.  The minimum wage is $10.25.  If that calculation is accepted, this means that the York Code requires Ontario suppliers to pay their workers more than the legal minimum wage.
Do you think the suppliers from Ontario on this list are complying with this requirement?  How do you think York is checking?  How does York know if a supplier from India or China is paying a “living wage”? Do you think that York should be dictating the price of labour to its suppliers?  These are the sorts of questions I’m looking at this project.
Won’t be posting much in the next week.  Hopefully I’ll be able to get around:  there are threatening public transit strikes in Italy and Air Canada strikes in Canada.  The joy of labour relations.  Ciao.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is a Full Professor of Work Law and Labour Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Harry Arthurs' Key Note Speech to Case Western: The Mysterious Disappearance of Labor … and of Labor Law?
next post
The Ontario Tories Announce Some Odd Workplace Law Platforms

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018


Follow Us On Social Media

Substack
Bluesky

BlueSky Latest Posts

No posts available.

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Tax Law
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.