The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

On CUPE Sick Days and Golden Parachutes

by David Doorey July 31, 2009
written by David Doorey July 31, 2009


The debate goes on at City Hall.  At some point today, the Council will finally vote for the deal (I suspect, see my post yesterday), and the strike will end, and life will return to normal.  The media will stop calling us labour law professors, alas.  Hey, who knew my subjects (labour law and industrial relations) would become the sexiest topic at university!
What do you think about all this public anger at the so-called sick day provision in the CUPE collective agreements?
Firstly, I don’t see the sick bank provision as some unprecedented benefit, as it is being described in the papers.  I see it as simply a form of a golden parachute of the sort that is not at all uncommon in the private sector for management types, with the benefit that this parachute actually includes a built in incentive for workers to maintain a good attendance record.  The workers get a pay-out at the end of their careers that is larger if they have had a good attendance record over the years.  That is why the employer agreed to it in the first place–to improve attendance.  If an employee misses work often, their golden parachute gets smaller.  Lots of private sector golden parachutes given to executives and management folk aren’t even tied to performance, and are for much, much, much higher amounts then that given to the CUPE workers.
Just do a google search of “golden parachutes”, and read all sorts of stories about huge bucks being paid out to employees when they retire or leave the companies.  For example, here’s one about the payment of hundreds of thousands of dollars to the ex-head of the a B.C. Olympic committee , and here’s a goody about the ousted CEO of General Motors, who received $8.2 million, plus a guaranteed $74,000 annual payment for life, and a story here about the payouts to Quebec politicians when they quit their jobs,  and this week there was a story about the payout of 140 million EUROs to the departing CEO of Porsche, and here’s a nice list of bank executives who recently received millions of dollars after leaving the banks (sometimes due to their dismal performance), and… well, I could go on and on, but you get the point.
Getting a payout when you leave your job is not that uncommon. Perhaps you want to argue that all of these end-of-job payouts should be made illegal.  Fine, then ban them for everyone (although I think that such a law would be difficult to enforce in practice).  But what policy rational can you come up with to justify an argument that only non-managerial, unionized public sector employees should be disqualified from bargaining that sort of arrangement?
Perhaps what people are angry about is that they don’t have that sort of benefit in their employment contract.  I know I don’t.  Fair enough.  But we can try to bargain one if we want.  Nothing is stopping us from trying to bargain our own ‘banked sick day” provision that would reward us for good attendance.  Who knows, maybe your employer will think it’s a good idea if attendance is poor at your workplace.
I also have to confess to some confusion at the idea that this provision is “Miller’s fault” or that “MIller caved” by not getting it completely removed in this round of bargaining.  That provision has been there for decades, and not one other Mayor ever tried to get rid of it.  So how is it that Miller is ‘in the back pocket of the union’ by bargaining a phase out of the plan when no other Mayor came close to doing that?  Mel Lastman didn’t accomplish that, so why isn’t he the sell-out to the union?   Do you think Miller would have been ‘better off’ by not even raising the issue of the sick days in bargaining like all the previous Mayors?  One thing seems clear–if he hadn’t tried to bargain it out, the Toronto public would still probably not even know it was there, and the media wouldn’t be talking about.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Watch Toronto Council's Debate About the Strike Settlement
next post
Strike OVER! Council Ratifies the Deal!

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
16h

A Nationwide Bargaining Unit to Fight Starbucks Is a Moon Shot Worth Trying

My latest on ⁦@jacobin⁩. https://jacobin.com/2022/08/starbucks-service-unions-nlrb-law-centralized-bargaining/

Reply on Twitter 1556339370461786112Retweet on Twitter 15563393704617861122Like on Twitter 155633937046178611211Twitter 1556339370461786112
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
20h

Luck is part of it for sure. Right time right place. True of a lot of jobs not just academia.

But in my experience sitting on lots of academic hiring committees, people selected have superior CVs. 60 applicants, one position. Not all luck. It’s a very competitive job market.

David Webster@dwebsterhist

I've been hired for 2 tenure track jobs and been on multiple committees, sent in more than 100 job applications, and done multiple interviews. Here is my thread 🛢
of job market advice for early career academics based on decades of experience:

1. Get lucky.

Reply on Twitter 1556285407817506817Retweet on Twitter 1556285407817506817Like on Twitter 15562854078175068171Twitter 1556285407817506817
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
6 Aug

Sunflowers!

Reply on Twitter 1556032894640037890Retweet on Twitter 1556032894640037890Like on Twitter 15560328946400378905Twitter 1556032894640037890
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.