The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

My New Paper: A Law of Just Transitions: Putting Labor Law to Work on Climate Change

by David Doorey October 26, 2015
written by David Doorey October 26, 2015

A few years ago, I was asked to participate as a labour law expert on a giant research project run out of York University called Work in a Warming World.  I set out to find out what labour law academics had been Just Transition and Law?writing about when it comes to climate change.  I found very little.  It turns out that while scientists and economists mostly agree that climate change will have important effects on labour markets, labour lawyers have participated very little in discussions about how law should prepare for those changes.
So my project turned on a question:  How can we bring labour law into the climate change discussion?
The outcome was a chapter in a new book called Transnational Labour Law, and a new article that is available for free download if you are interested. 

The paper  is called “A Law of Just Transitions?:  Putting Labor Law to Work on Climate Change”  I’ve presented drafts of this paper at conferences at the University of Amsterdam and the University of Toronto.
What is Just Transitions Law?
“Just transitions” is an idea developed by the North American labour movement (born in Canada, actually), but has since been adopted as a mantra by such global institutions as the ILO and the United Nations Environmental Program.  Although there’s growing interest in the concept of a “just transition” to a greener economy, there has to date been little substantive dialogue by lawyers and law makers about what role law would play in developing policy driven by the theory of a just transition:

“There appears to be an emerging framework that allows for a Just Transition to operate on several levels, ranging from the global-societal level down to workplaces and local communities. This framework is grounded in some well-established social practices in the face of job challenges, and is reflected in the ongoing work of the ILO, the trade unions, national and local governments, business and industry, and community-based organizations. However, it is a framework that has been structured around a principle and a goal. The principle holds that the costs and benefits of a transition to sustainability should be shared widely across society. The goal is to generalize this principle at the level of policy. Steps are being taken here and there to turn the Just Transition approach into reality, but there is still a long way to go before it becomes a policy norm.” 
United Nations Environmental Programme (p. 278)

Just Transition recognizes that some jobs and industries will change or disappear altogether as a result of climate change, while others will emerge as economies transition towards “greener” economies.   Their will be winners and losers in this transition, as there always are when economies transition, and this distribution will be experienced at both the domestic, regional, and international levels.  Check out this recent paper prepared by the Centre for Policy Alternatives exploring the meaning of just transitions in the Canadian context.  Today, there is quite a lot of writing on “just transition” and what it means, but hardly any of it is written by labour law scholars.  This is a shame, because labour lawyers know quite a bit about how law can shape and pursue economic outcomes while being guided by a theory of justice.
We could leave it to market forces to decide on how the risks and rewards of climate change and the economic transitions it will produce are distributed.  Or, we could plan for the transition, and use law and policy to guide a transition based on a theory of justice.  In my new paper, I propose that we study climate change and its potential impacts on labour markets through the lens of a new legal field called “Just Transitions Law“.
How we define the boundaries of legal fields influences how we perceive legal and policy challenges and how we craft legal solutions to those problems.

A Law of Just Transitions would re-draw the boundaries of a legal field around climate change, bringing together insights from labor law, environmental law, and environmental justice law in novel ways.  The legal field would be defined by two boundaries:

1.  A Factual matrix:  Laws that affect or respond to a transition to a greener economy;  and

2. A Normative Theory of Justice:  The distribution of costs, risks, and rewards associated with this transition should be distributed in a “just” manner.

As I explain in the paper, Just Transitions Law would include much that is familiar to labour lawyers, since labour law is what we use to pursue justice at work.  However, some areas of labour law will take on renewed importance, such as unemployment insurance law and retraining policies, to help bridge those workers whose jobs are lost in the transition.  However, Just Transitions Law would also include areas of law that are new to labour law, including aspects of environmental law, immigration law, energy law, property law, and land use law, among other fields.  The argument is that there may be value in re-bundling aspects of existing legal fields into a new legal boundary defined by the effects of climate change and the economy.  Doing so would allow policy makers to better grasp legal and policy strategies that produce a more organized, less harmful transition towards a greener economy.
See what you think.

2 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Are “Volunteers” the New Unpaid Interns?: How Ontario’s Employment Standards Act Treats "Volunteer" Misclassification
next post
Will the Ban on TTC Strikes Be Ruled Unconstitutional?

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
josheidelson Josh Eidelson @josheidelson ·
5h

Scoop: Labor Board prosecutors have concluded Starbucks illegally refused to fairly negotiate at dozens of newly-unionized cafes across the country https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-28/starbucks-illegally-refused-to-bargain-on-zoom-nlrb-lawyer-says Starbucks’ refusal to negotiate if some workers participated via Zoom was illegal, NLRB general counsel says

Reply on Twitter 1640509028567506950 Retweet on Twitter 1640509028567506950 140 Like on Twitter 1640509028567506950 412 Twitter 1640509028567506950
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
alexisshotwell Alexis Shotwell @alexisshotwell ·
11h

This morning the president of @Carleton_U sent out a note underlining his understanding of “how painful labour disruptions can be to communities,” pleading for us to be calm and respectful and to support our students at the end of term. 1/

Reply on Twitter 1640430514627551256 Retweet on Twitter 1640430514627551256 84 Like on Twitter 1640430514627551256 242 Twitter 1640430514627551256
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
12h

Oh fun.

‘AI is on the cusp of taking control: This is how it may all go wrong’

https://apple.news/AWvPXyT8WTVOs5byQvVk-3Q

Reply on Twitter 1640408084093779989 Retweet on Twitter 1640408084093779989 1 Like on Twitter 1640408084093779989 3 Twitter 1640408084093779989
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.