The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Is Telling Your Boss to "F#@& Off" Cause for Dismissal?

by David Doorey May 17, 2010
written by David Doorey May 17, 2010

You are an HR manager, and you notice one of your employees sulking around the workplace and complaining about the competence of management.  So you call the employee into a meeting and ask her what’s up, and the employee tells you to “f#@* off”.  You speak to your lawyer, and you decide to dismiss the employee for insubordination, without notice.  Did you have a legal right to do that?
These are the basic facts in a recent Saskatchewan case called Bohay v. 567876 Sask. Ltd..   A key additional fact was that the employee had 22 years’ unblemished performance with the employer as a hair stylist.   The employee sued the employer for wrongful dismissal, which my employment law students know is a lawsuit in which the employee alleges she was dismissed without having been given reasonable notice.  Here, the employee was given no notice, since the employer alleged it had cause to dismiss her.  The Court ruled in favour of the employee.
The judge found that most of the evidence about the employee bad-mouthing the management was suspect and based on hearsay and unreliable assumptions.  But there was no doubting the swearing the employee directed at the owners of the business.  However, the court found that the employee was tired and stressed out, and that the swearing was an “out of character” aberration, and did not constitute cause for dismissal without notice.  The Court ordered 9 month’s reasonable notice (which seems low to me for a 22 year employee), but then reduces that amount by 3 months because the employee elected to take a lower paying job at Second Cup rather than look for a job in the hair-styling industry, which may have paid her more.  So sounds like the duty to mitigate your loses means that you have to search for the highest paying job that you are qualified for, even if you want to try something new (this employee claimed she wanted to get out of the hair industry).
An interesting part of this decision is the judge’s comments about the need to give an employee a warning before dismissing them for cause.   The court rules that, given the employee’s long service,  the employer “was required to provide a warning to the plaintiff that her behaviour must improve before she could be dismissed.” In support of this finding, the Court sites several other Saskatchewan decisions, including Riehl v. Westfair Foods (1995), in which the Court said this:

This theory, [the “corrective” theory] universally applied by collective agreement arbitrators and statutory adjudicators, requires that the employer, prior to invoking dismissal, warn the employee of his/her faults and give the employee a reasonable chance to improve.  Not only does the employee obtain the benefit of a second chance, but also the efficiency of the company increases because, assuming that the worker does improve, the company will have avoided the costs of recruiting and training a replacement.  Today, most courts apply the “corrective” theory in determining whether or not there is “cause” for summary dismissal in exactly the same way as do arbitrators and adjudicators ….

Therefore, it appears that in Saskatchewan at least there is a requirement for an employer to issue a warning to an employee before dismissing them for cause.  This principle appears to have been borrowed from labour arbitration in the unionized setting, although the benefits of progressive discipline were also recognized by the Supreme Court in McKinley v. BC Tel.
Of course, unionized employers are also expected to use their power to suspend employees as well, as a final warning before dismissal.  But in the non-union setting governed by the common law, suspensions without pay are a breach of contract (and may be treated by the employee as a constructive dismissal), unless the contract gives the employer that right (and most don’t)  (see Carscallen, for example). So the tools available to an employer to employ “progressive discipline” are not identical for the unionized and the non-unionized employer in most cases.
What do you think of this case?  Do you think an employer should be entitled to dismiss an employee without notice (for cause) if the employee tells the management to “F” off?

2 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Should We Allow Shopping 365 Days a Year?
next post
Is Telling Your Boss to F*@% Off Cause for Dismissal: Part Deux

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
15h

A Nationwide Bargaining Unit to Fight Starbucks Is a Moon Shot Worth Trying

My latest on ⁦@jacobin⁩. https://jacobin.com/2022/08/starbucks-service-unions-nlrb-law-centralized-bargaining/

Reply on Twitter 1556339370461786112Retweet on Twitter 15563393704617861122Like on Twitter 155633937046178611211Twitter 1556339370461786112
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
19h

Luck is part of it for sure. Right time right place. True of a lot of jobs not just academia.

But in my experience sitting on lots of academic hiring committees, people selected have superior CVs. 60 applicants, one position. Not all luck. It’s a very competitive job market.

David Webster@dwebsterhist

I've been hired for 2 tenure track jobs and been on multiple committees, sent in more than 100 job applications, and done multiple interviews. Here is my thread 🛢
of job market advice for early career academics based on decades of experience:

1. Get lucky.

Reply on Twitter 1556285407817506817Retweet on Twitter 1556285407817506817Like on Twitter 15562854078175068171Twitter 1556285407817506817
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
6 Aug

Sunflowers!

Reply on Twitter 1556032894640037890Retweet on Twitter 1556032894640037890Like on Twitter 15560328946400378905Twitter 1556032894640037890
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.