The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Is Buying Pot at Work "Just Cause" Under the Canada Labour Code?

by David Doorey April 22, 2010
written by David Doorey April 22, 2010

We have a very piecemeal approach to the law of dismissal in Canada.   Unionized employees can only be dismissed for ‘just cause’, because unions bargain that requirement into collective agreements.   Disputes about whether an employer had just cause are dealt with through a grievance procedure and ultimately end up before a labour arbitrator (not a court), who applies labour arbitration principles (and not common law principles).
Nonunion employees in most of Canada have no similar ‘just cause’ protection.  Instead, the common law rules apply, and the common law grants employers the right to dismiss employees for any reason, or no reason at all, provided the employee is given the notice required by the contract (if the contract says anything), or “reasonable notice”, which is a judge-made implied term.  As I remind my students, under the common law model, it would be perfectly fine for an employer to fire everyone “wearing blue” one day, as long as those people are then cut a cheque for the proper period of notice.
Statutory Just Cause Protection
But there is also a third model in Canada.  In a few jurisdictions (Federal, Quebec, and Nova Scotia), the employment standards legislation includes a form of just cause protection for non-union employees.  There’s a great discussion of the history of the Federal model, and how it works today, in the Arthurs’ Commission Report Fairness at Work, and in the report of Professor Geoffrey England prepared for that study.
The Federal provisions are found in Section 240 of the Canada Labour Code.
Consider Soplet v. Bank of Nova Scotia. The employee there bought a small amount of pot from a co-worker at work.  The Bank dismissed him, and alleged just cause.  The employee filed a complaint under Section 240 and won.  The adjudicator ruled that the misconduct was not so serious to amount to just cause considering that the employee had over 6 years of high quality service.  The adjudicator could have reinstated the employee, but the employee already had another job.  So the adjudicator ordered the employer to pay 6 months’ wages at $6050 per month, plus 10% more for lost benefit coverage, plus interest at a rate of 4%.  Ultimately, a pretty expensive ding for the bank, which no doubt thought that buying pot at work is a serious breach of the contract.
If this employee was not covered by the Canada Labour Code, then the common law would have applied.  The employer would have dismissed the employee and alleged ’cause’, so that it would not have to give ‘reasonable notice’.  The employee would then have to sue the employer for wrongful dismissal.  The court would then decide if buying a small amount of pot amounted to ’cause’ for summary dismissal.

How do you think a common law court would decide that issue, given what you know about the law of summary dismissal?  Do you HR managers out there believe that you can dismiss an employee for cause (without notice) if the employee is caught buying pot at work?

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
The High Cost of Low Apparel Prices
next post
Labour Arbitrator Awards Dismissed Employee $500,000 in Damages!

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
8h

If one these dimwits was a Sacha Baron Cohen-like comedian playing the role of a Republican would any one notice?

PatriotTakes 🇺🇸@patriottakes

Marjorie Taylor Greene believes generating electricity from “wind turbines and solar panels” will result in the loss of air conditioning and home appliances.

Greene: “I like the lights on. I want to stay up later at night. I don’t want to have to go to bed when the sun sets.”

Reply on Twitter 1558630572783722497Retweet on Twitter 15586305727837224972Like on Twitter 15586305727837224974Twitter 1558630572783722497
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
11h

A student told me she is translating chapters of my book into Korean because she learned a lot and wants it as a reference but English is her second language.

Any Korean speakers out there? What does this say?

일의 법칙

Reply on Twitter 1558595466182393858Retweet on Twitter 1558595466182393858Like on Twitter 1558595466182393858Twitter 1558595466182393858
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
11h

I have no idea who this person is or what is going on in Peterborough.

There’s a world of crazy around me that I’m missing.

Caryma Sa'd - Lawyer + Political Satirist@CarymaRules

Romana Didulo provides entertainment for the thinned out crowd in the form of her favourite song, Rasputin.

#cdnpoli #Peterborough #QAnon

Reply on Twitter 1558592062097956865Retweet on Twitter 1558592062097956865Like on Twitter 15585920620979568653Twitter 1558592062097956865
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.