The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

When Did Having No Job Security Become a Virtue?

by David Doorey February 9, 2011
written by David Doorey February 9, 2011

This was one of those weeks in which I was flooded with media interview inquiries.  They were all about the City of Toronto’s decision to contract out part of the City’s garbage collection. The City’s plan is to fire all of the non-pernament employees now, but not the permanent employees, because those employees have bargained contractual protections which forbid the employer from firing them and replacing them with cheaper, private sector workers.  Mayor Ford and his sidekicks are saying that they will try and bargain away that job protection language when the collective agreement ends at the end of this year. As I noted in an interview with a Toronto Star reporter, that will virtually guarantee us a new nasty labour dispute in 2012, since what sensible employee would not fight back against an employer who has promised to fire them.
I have no personal interest in any of this.  Unlike apparently a lot of suburban Torontonians,  I really don’t care who picks up my garbage.  I put it out, and someone picks it up.  Here’s what interests me about all this.  The reason that Mayor Ford can get elected on a promise to fire employees must be that a good proportion of the population believes that job security is a bad thing. Ford’s supporters are seething about a contract term that says that if you have devoted 10 years of our life to the employer, then the employer can’t just fire you and give your job to a cheaper worker.  Instead, the employer has to try and find you other work.  Do you think a job security clause like this is terrible?
Not long ago, having a job for life was the norm, in a positive sense.  Workers joined a company out of school, started a low level job, with the expectation that  if they worked hard, they could spend their entire career at the same company.  This allowed people to plan their lives, invest in homes, raise children, with decent (but not absolute) confidence that they would continue to be employed.

When the Mayors Ford uses “jobs for life”, they mean it pejoratively. Ford supporters say we have to get rid of “jobs for life”. Doug Ford–whose daddy owns a business–says that everyone should be subject to losing their job whenever the employer decides to replace them with cheaper workers.  Obviously, this is a world that is very beneficial to employers, like the Ford family.  It is easier to make big profits and pay out huge executive compensation if you can keep workers’ wages low.
But the  mysterious question is: Why do workers think this is a good idea?  Is a system in which workers have no job security good for workers and society?

Perhaps what is happening is that people who don’t have any job security are just angry, envious of those that do.  And more and more people have no job security.  But rather than say, “good for them, I wish I could get some of that job security”, they say, “damn you, your employer should be able to fire you at a whim, just like my employer can fire me”.   Rather than be supportive of unions’ efforts to obtain some measure of job security for workers, the workers who support Ford’s ideology think unions are evil and that job security should be done away with.
This is relatively new phenomena.  In days past, an argument by anti-union politicians and corporations that job security provisions are terrible for workers and society would have been quickly dismissed by the vast majority of the population as self-serving corporate propaganda.  [See the interesting explanation of why this is perhaps no longer the case in this New Yorker article]
We live in an odd time when workers side with employers in arguing against employee job security and decent working conditions.  Employers and politicians have done a masterful job at persuading employees that job insecurity is in their best interest.  One day, historians may look back at this time and wonder what the hell workers were thinking.

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
The TTC and "Work to Rule"
next post
TTC Refuses Union's Offer to Send Bargaining Disputes to Arbitration

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 334 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
4h

50% of watching @CNN is listening to possible side effects of drugs being hocked.

Reply on Twitter 1540106698198753282Retweet on Twitter 1540106698198753282Like on Twitter 15401066981987532823Twitter 1540106698198753282
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
8h

Yet another reason to not shop at Walmart

kira 👾@kirawontmiss

bro terrorized everybody in walmart

Reply on Twitter 1540041918565998594Retweet on Twitter 1540041918565998594Like on Twitter 15400419185659985942Twitter 1540041918565998594
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
10h

lol. Classic.

I was told by a Saskatchewan arbitrator that he wasn’t interested in arguments about how similar statutory language is interpreted ‘out east’. Because they do things their own way in Saskatchewan.

Eric Sherkin@ericsherkin

@TheLawofWork I was a 1st yr associate arguing a motion in Guelph on short notice (partner on the file was speaking at a conference and didn't want to miss it) and being told by the judge that "I know how things are in Toronto, but sharp practice stops when you cross the Humber River."

Reply on Twitter 1540016476551274497Retweet on Twitter 1540016476551274497Like on Twitter 15400164765512744973Twitter 1540016476551274497
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.