The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Here are the Minister of Labour's References to the CIRB in Air Canada

by David Doorey March 10, 2012
written by David Doorey March 10, 2012

I noted the other day that Minister of Labour Lisa Raitt had used her favourite power on the Canada Labour Code again, the ‘reference’ under Section 87.4(5), to suspend any lockout or strike at Air Canada.  The Minister was forced to act by the notice of strikes and lockouts by the parties this week.  For policy reasons that aren’t really clear to me,  the structure of the Code is such that a reference under Section 87.4(5) only suspends a work stoppage if it is submitted to the Board by the Minister before the work stoppage begins.  Since a notice to lockout the pilots on Monday had been served by Air Canada, the Minister was forced to get the application in immediately.  Of course, Air Canada knew that too, so it’s notice of a lockout was not a ‘real’ notice of lockout.  Everyone knew the Minister would file this reference the moment notice to strike or lockout was served.
Section 87.4(5) of the Code is the section that is supposed to deal with an emergency threat to health and safety that could arise due to a work stoppage.  No one really believes that Air Canada provides emergency services to Canadians as Raitt claims.  I doubt even she does.  Raitt is no dummy.  This section was never intended to apply to the Air Canada situation.  But Canadian law does not have a provision for a government to stop a work stoppage at a private business because it would piss of March Break travellers or because it would harm the economy.  So the Minister has to pretend that Air Canada is like a really expensive ambulance and medical services company.  It’s all rather unbecoming of an elected official, but it achieves the government’s objective of stopping work stoppages.
It prevents a work stoppage for as long as it takes the CIRB to hear evidence and decide if there is an immediate threat to health and safety of Canadians posed by a work stoppage.  By that time, the government hopes that the parties will have reached a deal.  If they don’t, then the government will just use its majority powers to ram through back to work legislation.  News is the legislation is already in the works.  The reference power is useful to Raitt because she does not need to present any evidence that a work stoppage in fact would cause a threat.  All she needs to do is say it might, and that is enough to suspend a work stoppage.  Brilliant.
The other benefit of using this reference power is that it is unlikely to cause a Charter challenge as would back to work legislation.  It’s possible to argue that Section 87.4(5), and this Minister’s unusual and frequent use of it, amounts to interference with freedom of association, but I have not heard any rumblings of a Charter challenge against it (yet).  The reference is less messy.  Fewer of those irritating little Constitutional rights issues to worry about.
The References
Here is the Minister’s Reference relating to the Pilots.
Here is the reference relating to ground crew (Machinists)

What do you think about Raitt’s use of a essential medical services provision to inject the state into a private collective bargaining situation?
Do you support this approach, or not?
Should the government pass a law permitting the Minister to ban a strike or lockout at a private business whenever she likes, for whatever reason?  Why or why not?

I will be on CTV News at noon tomorrow talking about Air Canada, if you are bored.

6 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Raitt's at it Again: Blocks Strikes/Lockouts at Air Canada
next post
Here is Bill C-33: The Latest Air Canada Keep-On-Working Bill

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
peterframpton Peter Frampton @peterframpton ·
27 Mar

I have posted this before but ..

26 years ago, a gunman entered
Dunblane Primary School in Scotland,
killing 16 kids and a teacher. The UK
govt responded by enacting tight gun
control legislation. In the 9400+ days
since, there have been a total of O
school shootings in the UK.

Reply on Twitter 1640422829442121743 Retweet on Twitter 1640422829442121743 53735 Like on Twitter 1640422829442121743 195835 Twitter 1640422829442121743
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
josheidelson Josh Eidelson @josheidelson ·
21h

Scoop: Labor Board prosecutors have concluded Starbucks illegally refused to fairly negotiate at dozens of newly-unionized cafes across the country https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-28/starbucks-illegally-refused-to-bargain-on-zoom-nlrb-lawyer-says Starbucks’ refusal to negotiate if some workers participated via Zoom was illegal, NLRB general counsel says

Reply on Twitter 1640509028567506950 Retweet on Twitter 1640509028567506950 234 Like on Twitter 1640509028567506950 674 Twitter 1640509028567506950
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
alexisshotwell Alexis Shotwell @alexisshotwell ·
27 Mar

This morning the president of @Carleton_U sent out a note underlining his understanding of “how painful labour disruptions can be to communities,” pleading for us to be calm and respectful and to support our students at the end of term. 1/

Reply on Twitter 1640430514627551256 Retweet on Twitter 1640430514627551256 123 Like on Twitter 1640430514627551256 336 Twitter 1640430514627551256
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.