The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Have York Deans Violated the Labour Relations Act?

by David Doorey January 16, 2009
written by David Doorey January 16, 2009

Here’s a good question for a labour law exam.  Yesterday, in a clear attempt to influence the outcome of the forced ratification vote next week by striking CUPE members, the Deans of York’s faculties issued an extraordinary message to all York employees (full text below).  The note mentions that the Deans had been “consulted” with throughout bargaining, presumably by the employer’s negotiators.  It then recommends that the strikers accept the employer’s offer in the context of a volley of gloomy language, including comments about “severe budgetary constraints”, the “worsening economic crisis”, the “significant negative impact” of the dispute, the “extremely difficult economic climate”, and the “debilitating strike”.   Its hard to imagine a message hitting the strikers any harder over the head–vote yes, or very bad things might happen to you and/or the university.
Keep in mind that for most of strikers, their de facto employer–the person they take orders from and must answer to–include the full-time professors (a minority of  whom have also taken it upon themselves to lobby the strikers to accept the employer’s offer) and the Deans of their faculties.  So the question for the law school exam is:  Does the notice from Deans amount to a violation of:
(1)  Section 70, which prevents employers, or persons acting on behalf of employers, from interfering with the administration of a union, but does not prevent the expression of opinions that are not threatening or intimidating and that do not amount to “undue influence”.
(2) section 72, which prohibits employers, or persons acting on behalf of employers, from making any kind of threat that intends to compel a striker to stop exercising their legal right to strike;
(3) section 73, which prevents employers, or persons acting on behalf of employers, from bargaining directly with unionized employees, and thereby by-passing the union; or 
(4) section 76, which prevents anyone from intimidating an employee for the purposes of compelling them to cease engaging in a lawful strike.
I won’t grade the answers, but I do encourage any of you out there to submit your thoughts on whether the communication from the Deans, set out in full below, might violate one of these sections. Bonus points for noting that, whatever the legal answer is, it is obvious that animosity between the employees, their faculty bosses, the Deans, and the University will be high for some time, regardless of how the vote goes next week now that everyone at the University appears to have taken sides in this dispute.

January 15, 2009 
Message from the Deans to the York community 
When CUPE 3903 went on strike in November, we all undertook to seek the suspension, with 
limited exceptions, of academic activities in our Faculties. In so doing, we acknowledged our 
reliance on the work of our CUPE colleagues in helping to carry out the academic mission of the 
University. In addition, we continue to recognize the importance to our graduate students of 
financial support for the successful completion of their “apprenticeship” in our profession. 
At the same time, we have had to recognize the unusually severe budgetary constraints that 
currently characterize all universities in the country in the midst of a worsening economic crisis. 
And we have had to consider the significant negative impact of a continuing labour disruption on 
all of our students, as well as on the reputation and academic development of the University. 
Having all these considerations in mind, we have reviewed the offer for settlement tabled by the 
University administration (and indeed have been consulted as negotiations were underway). We 
believe that the offer is a responsible effort to meet the needs of contract faculty and graduate 
students in an extremely difficult economic climate. Familiar as we are with the budget situation 
in our own Faculties, we do not believe that more can be responsibly provided. We hope CUPE 
members will recognize the gains they have made, and put an end to this debilitating strike by 
accepting the settlement offer. 
Cynthia Archer 
Nick Cercone 
Robert Drummond 
Dezsö Horváth 
Rhonda Lenton 
Kenneth McRoberts 
Patrick Monahan 
Doug Peers 
Alice Pitt 
Barbara Rahder 
Barbara Sellers-Young 
Harvey Skinner 

10 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Wrongful Dismissal Damages: McNevan v. AmeriCredit
next post
Could York Strikers Return to Work While the Strike Continues

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018


Follow Us On Social Media

Substack
Bluesky

BlueSky Latest Posts

  • Get to this post

    David J. Doorey (aka The Law of Work) @thelawofwork.bsky.social 16 hours

    Interesting BCLRB decision upheld by Court of Appeal:

    Air Canada’s direction to caterer to load enough food at non-BC airports for inbound & outbound flights out of Vancouver unlawfully avoided BC’s anti-scab worker law.

    Caters on strike in Vancouver.

    www.vancouverisawesome.com/highlights/b...
  • Get to this post

    David J. Doorey (aka The Law of Work) @thelawofwork.bsky.social 1 day

    Only a matter of time before all airline cabin crew realize they are better off with collective bargaining than trying to deal with airlines individually.

    ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/porter-...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Tax Law
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.