The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Guest Blog: Wozniak on Dismissing Employees

by David Doorey September 8, 2009
written by David Doorey September 8, 2009

 
   Last week I noted an interesting case out of Ontario called Stowar v.  Telehop.  That’s the case in which the HR Manager made an error in the termination letter, offering 5 months’ pay instead of the ESA minimum of 3 weeks’ pay.  When the employer noticed its mistake, it refused to pay the 5 month’s notice, and the employee successfully sued to recover that money. The Court ruled that the letter setting out the the promise to $5000 was an enforceable contract.  But  I noted in my posting that since the employer was required to pay ‘reasonable notice’ to the employee as a term of the employment contract, the $5000 could also be considered satisfaction of the employer’s contractual obligation.  Paying an employee the minimum statutory notice in the Employment Standards Act does not satisfy the employer’s contractual obligation to pay the (usually) larger period of ‘reasonable notice’.  In other words, the employer who pays an employee ESA minimum notice is usually also required by any greater amount of notice required by the contract, unless the employee signs a release waiving the contractual entitlement to the greater contractual notice.
Ryan Wozniak was the lawyer representing the successful plaintiff (the employee, Stowar) in that case.  He works at a leading Toronto employment law firm called Ball & Alexander .  In this latest segment of our Guest Blog feature, Ryan comments on the Stowar case and the lessons in it for employers and HR managers in particular:

In many ways, this case is an ideal teaching tool. In addition to highlighting some key employment law principles, including the critical distinction between the period of notice required by minimum standards legislation (i.e. the ESA) and the “period of reasonable notice” available at common law, the decision raises two very important practical considerations. 

 

First, every employer should, to the extent possible, secure written contracts of employment with its workers that contain unambiguous termination provisions; that is, terms which expressly set out the period of notice, or pay in lieu thereof, that the employer must provide to an employee on termination. The cost of doing so may seem high, but it pales in comparison to the cost of litigating disputes over notice periods, or worse, negligently drafted termination letters, which disputes can go on for months, perhaps years. The contract should also set out the amount of notice an employee must provide to the employer should he or she wish to leave.

 

Second, employers should always obtain legal counsel before communicating with employees about the terms, or proposed terms, of their severance. Many employers, no matter how sophisticated, fail to appreciate that oral and written communications made during the course of discussions regarding severance can have contractual force. More importantly, if an employer fails to obtain a release from an employee, then it leaves itself exposed to other employment related claims, such as a claim for damages for alleged human rights violations. I recently settled a case involving an employer who gave an employee sufficient notice of termination but failed to secure a release because “it did not want to spend thousands of dollars on lawyers”. The employer ended up paying over $10,000.00 to the employee, plus thousands more in legal fees, to settle a residual human rights complaint.

 

As one author put it, anyone who thinks talk is cheap should get some legal advice.

Good advice indeed.  Thanks for this Ryan, and nice job on Stowar case, which will now be added to my course readings in Employment Law.


0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Is a 'stripper' an 'employee' or an 'independent contractor'?
next post
Michaluk (Hicks Morley) on Labour Law Education

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

TheLawofWork Follow

@ ·
now

Reply on Twitter Retweet on Twitter Like on Twitter Twitter
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.