Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
Law of Work Archive

Future Looks Bleak for my Students. Whose Fault Is That?

by David Doorey October 26, 2011
written by David Doorey October 26, 2011

The future looks bleak for my students.  Economists warn that it’s probable many of them will not do better than their parents, despite the fact that they have way more education on average.  Odds are most of them will barely claw their way into the middle class, what’s left of the middle class that is in 20 years or so.
We know why. There is no great mystery here.  The share of wealth that used to go to the large bulk of workers in the middle range of income earners is now being kept by a small percentage of people at the top of the income pyramid. Sure, some of my students might work their way into that elite group.  Most won’t.
Canada’s fast growing inequality has been singled out in a number of recent reports.  Here’s just a few examples:

Conference Board of Canada: Since the mid-1990s, Canada’s income inequality has risen faster than the U.S., and faster than most advanced economic states.
OECD: “In the last 10 years, the rich have been getting richer leaving both middle and poorer income classes behind. The rich in Canada are particularly rich compared to their counterparts in other countries.”

Here is a nice study by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives describing the growing inequality.  It points out the following facts:

  • The Top 1% (above $400K per year) of income earners took home 1/3 of all income gains between 1997-2007.  During the last similar period of high economic growth (1950s/60s), the top 1% took only 8% of the income gains.

Why is the middle class disappearing in the U.S. and Canada?
Changes in tax policy since the 1980s and 1990s is a large part of the story.  In the U.S., Americans decided they don’t want to pay taxes.  Politicians trip over one another to cut taxes.  Canadians are buying into that same mentality.   Cutting taxes for the wealthy in particular has been pushed by Republicans and modern Canadian Conservatives (neoliberals).  They argue that cutting taxes  is the magic potion that cures all social and economic ills.  They mostly shrug about income inequality.  Canadians vote for these tax policies, so it makes good political sense to just keep promising more and more tax cuts.
When Obama and some NDP leadership candidates recently suggested that perhaps we should be concerned about income inequality and we should raise taxes on the wealthy to return to a tax system more like we had prior to the 1990s, the Conservatives and Republicans lashed out, called them nutters, and argued this would destroy, absolutely destroy the economy!
Changes in labour and employment law policy are another major explanation for the fast growing income inequality.  Governments in both the U.S. and Canada decided beginning in the 1980s (in the U.S.) and 1990s (in Canada) that employment laws and collective bargaining are bad. Employment standards were rolled back, frozen, or underfunded, and governments attacked collective bargaining.  As a result, unionization in the U.S. private sector has mostly disappeared (about 6%), and in Canada’s private sector unionization percentage is now in the mid-teens.

We know that collective bargaining:  decreases income inequality by raising workers’ wages and benefits, and by lowering executive compensation.  In other words, collective bargaining takes income from the top and spreads it through the middle. Countries that have high unionization rates have lower income inequality and poverty.  There is a direct link.
A recent study by a Harvard economist found that 1/5 to 1/3 of the explosion in income inequality in the U.S. between 1973 and 2007 is explained by the decline in private sector unionization from above 30 % of workers to about 7%.  No wonder Obama argued that perhaps more collective bargaining would help increase spending power of Americans and thereby drive the economy.

No great mysteries here.  Taxes redistribute income throughout society and pay for social services that help the poor.  Employment laws and collective bargaining  put more money into the hands of workers, who can then buy more goods and drive the economy.

All of which raises the big question for a workplace law blog:  If income inequality is unhealthy for a society, and collective bargaining and taxes substantially reduce income inequality, why are our governments so keen on demonizing unions and taxes these days.
More importantly, why do we vote for politicians who propose to cut taxes and weaken unions?
Do you think lower taxes and the elimination of unions and strong employment laws will create a healthier and fairer society?  Why, or why not?

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is the Director of the School of HRM at York and Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and on the Advisory Board of the Osgoode Certificate program in Labour Law. He is a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program and a member of the International Advisory Committee on Harvard University’s Clean Slate Project, which is re-imaging labor law for the 21st century

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
Home Depot Discriminates Against Turban-Wearing Employee
next post
Starbucks and the Human Rights Code: What Does S. 23(2) of the Code Mean?

You may also like

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

A Successful Strike Vote is All That Stands...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Putin Invites Trump to Moscow for Second Meeting...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 218 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
14h

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211853Twitter 1364627677785821185
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
14h

Here's my latest in @jacobinmag.

If Ontario's labor laws applied in Alabama, the Amazon vote would have been held months ago so workers could get back to their jobs. Instead, the NLRA permits Amazon to conduct a months' long onslaught of anti-union propaganda. https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1364613560425275392

Jacobin@jacobinmag

Amazon workers in Alabama are voting on whether to unionize, but the company is bombarding them with anti-union propaganda. In Canada, by contrast, votes are held quickly, making it harder for companies to stack the deck — a model that can work in the US. http://jacobinmag.com/2021/02/amazon-alabama-canada-labor-law-union-vote

Reply on Twitter 1364623976174092316Retweet on Twitter 13646239761740923168Like on Twitter 136462397617409231613Twitter 1364623976174092316
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
16h

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364605259071561730Retweet on Twitter 13646052590715617304Like on Twitter 13646052590715617304Twitter 1364605259071561730
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.