The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Fraser v. Ontario: Constitutional Right to Collective Bargaining Survives, Just Barely

by David Doorey April 29, 2011
written by David Doorey April 29, 2011

The Supreme Court’s decision in Fraser v. Ontario was released this morning. Here it is.  I’ve only skimmed it since I was at a conference all morning, and now need to pump out a paper form my conference in Florence later this month (I know, whoa is me).
So while I would usually do a full breakdown of the decision, I won’t be able to right now. Instead, I will link to some other summaries of the decision already flowing out.  I note that the news headlines are saying “no right to unionize for farm workers”.  That’s not what the decision says, as I read it.  They have a right to unionize, as do all workers.  The Agricultural Employees Protection Act, which was upheld in the decision, gives them a right to unionize without retaliation from the employers.  The issue was whether they have a right to engage in collective bargaining and if so, what that means.
As it typical of this Court on Section 2(d) [freedom of association] matters, the Court is divide and the reasoning is often difficult to follow.  There are four different sets of reasons because the judges can’t see to agree on much in a nice lean decision with 369 paragraphs. O, brother.
The main majority decision is written by Chief Justice McLachlin and LeBel J. with three other judges agreeing with their reasons (Binnie, Fish, Cromwell).    They rule essentially that Section 2(d) does protect a limited right to collective bargaining, as found in B.C. Health Services.  It is a limited right for workers to come together and make collective representations to their employers, and to have their employer listen to their representations and discuss them in “good faith”.  Then the employer can say “go to hell”. That’s some serious right.  Insofar as laws substantially interfere with the employees’ ability to exercise that limited right, they run afoul of Section 2(d).   The majority ruled that the Agricultural Employees Protection Act does not violate Section 2(d), applying this test, and that Chief Justice Winkler of the Court of Appeal, a former employer-side labour lawyer, was wrong in ruling that Section 2(d) protects a right to majority representation, exclusive union representation, a duty to bargain in good faith, and some form of dispute resolution method.
Once again, Justice Abella, the judge probably most knowledgeable in labour law, dissents.  However, this time she is alone.  Justice LeBel, who is also a labour lawyer and who has sided with Abella before in efforts to expand the scope of freedom of association, sided with the majority.  Abella would have ruled that the AEPA violates Section 2(d) because it fails to protect a practical right of agricultural workers to engage in collective bargaining.
The other two judges, Rothstein and Charron, would have overruled B.C. Health Services altogether and found Section 2(d) does not protect a right to collective bargaining.  They rely heavily on critical writings by my academic colleagues, especially Brian Langille (U. of T.) and Eric Tucker (York), who criticized the analysis in B.C. Health Services for improperly interpreting labour history and international labour law.
So here are some same day commentaries from around the Internet.  I’ll add more later.  I will also post any comments sent to my blog about this case, so if you have a view on the decision, please send it along.
SLAW’s coverage
Globe and Mail story {Note that the headline “Agricultural Workers Have No Right to Unionize is not accurate. They do have a right to unionize, they just don’t have a right to insist on formal collective bargaining backed by some form of dispute resolution process]
The United Food and Commercial Workers take on the decision.

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Newsflash: SCC to Release Fraser v. Ontario Today!
next post
Canada Votes on Monday: Employee Entitlements, and the Rise of the Mice?

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
3h

Looks really interesting!

SFU Labour Studies @SFU_LBST

We have partnered with UBC @AllardLaw and is sponsoring the "Mapping the Future of Canadian Labour Law" public lecture by @TheLawofWork

March 22 (Wed) 12:30pm - 2:00pm | Hybrid | Sauder Industries Policy Room @ SFU Harbour Centre

RSVP: https://allard.ubc.ca/about-us/events-calendar/mapping-future-canadian-labour-law

Reply on Twitter 1619142841447448578 Retweet on Twitter 1619142841447448578 1 Like on Twitter 1619142841447448578 12 Twitter 1619142841447448578
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
sfu_lbst SFU Labour Studies @sfu_lbst ·
10h

We have partnered with UBC @AllardLaw and is sponsoring the "Mapping the Future of Canadian Labour Law" public lecture by @TheLawofWork

March 22 (Wed) 12:30pm - 2:00pm | Hybrid | Sauder Industries Policy Room @ SFU Harbour Centre

RSVP: https://allard.ubc.ca/about-us/events-calendar/mapping-future-canadian-labour-law

Reply on Twitter 1619041468945170432 Retweet on Twitter 1619041468945170432 1 Like on Twitter 1619041468945170432 6 Twitter 1619041468945170432
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
sethdklein Seth Klein @sethdklein ·
22h

It's 2023. BC Farm Workers Deserve Basic Minimum Wage Guarantees @HarryBainsSN via @TheTyee https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2023/01/26/Farm-Workers-Deserve-Basic-Minimum-Wage/?utm_source=daily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=260123&utm_source=The+Tyee&utm_campaign=e12c23277b-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2023_01_26_06_07&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_979b7d233e-e12c23277b-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D

Reply on Twitter 1618852701743505409 Retweet on Twitter 1618852701743505409 7 Like on Twitter 1618852701743505409 14 Twitter 1618852701743505409
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.