The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Do Transit Employers Have a Legal Duty to Prohibit Passengers from Filming Drivers?

by David Doorey November 17, 2011
written by David Doorey November 17, 2011

Here we go again.
Last year, it was TTC passengers who began filming bus drivers and ticket collectors who they believed were performing poorly, and then posting those videos on you-tube. This strategy got a lot of news coverage, but also had the predictable result of raising tensions among TTC employees and the public even worse than they already were.  In one incident, a driver angrily filmed an angry passenger filming him.  It turned out the ticket collector who was filmed asleep and posted on the front page of newspapers was ill and on heavy meds, went on sick leave after becoming the subject of public ridicule, and then died a few months later. This was not a proud day in the history of Toronto.
I was contacted by CBC radio yesterday for my opinion on an incident on an Ottawa bus involving a driver who was filmed verbally abusing a passenger and the video was then posted on You-Tube. The driver was fired, and the union has filed a grievance asking for reinstatement.  Again, not defending the driver’s behaviour, but it turns out that the driver is going through a very tough time, having recently lost both his wife and mother to cancer. Often there is more to a story than is evident in a short videoclip.

Nevertheless, there is no doubt that the driver’s behaviour in Ottawa is inexcusable and he should be subject to some form of discipline.  But I’m interested in another issue here that is being completely overlooked:
What is the legal responsibility of the transit employers to ensure, or at least attempt to prohibit passengers from video-taping their employees?

I have not seen either the TTC or OC Transpo come out strong against passengers pulling out video phones or cameras on buses and trains and filming their employees. Should this be discouraged, and passengers told firmly to use the passenger complaint processes rather than You-Tube and personal paparazzi’s if they have a problem with a driver?
Employers have a variety of legal obligations to prevent unwanted harassment in the workplace, to ensure a safe working environment, and since Bill 168 became law, to ensure policies are in place to address when an employee is faced with harassment at work or the threat of violence at work. Buses and trains are workplaces.   They are the drivers’ offices.
If I walked into my Dean’s office, or the office of another professor or administrative assistant, and began filming them against their wishes, and then posted their angry response to my filming them on the internet, I have no doubt that I would be disciplined in some way.  My employer would certainly announce that filming employees at the workplace without their consent is a forbidden intrusion on privacy and harassment that is guaranteed to be disruptive to productivity and workplace morale.  How would you feel if a stranger or customer came into your office and started filming you against your wishes, and then posted the video for all to see on the internet?  Would you expect your employer to support you in saying that no filming of employees at work  by customers or anyone else will be permitted?  I can tell you that if someone filmed me at work, and didn’t stop when I asked, I would have no qualms grabbing their phone and throwing it out the window.  Would I be in the wrong there?
We have already seen on numerous occasions that filming drivers tends to raise tensions, not ease them.  This creates a real risk of a violent altercation (if not a crash!).
Do you think these risks trigger a legal duty on the transit companies to introduce and promote a policy banning the video recording of employees on buses and trains, under the Occupational Health and Safety Act, including the new Bill 168?
From an HR perspective, do you think the employers’ should protect the right of employees to not be filmed at work against their wishes?
Or do you think the passengers should be encouraged by the employer to film any situation in which they perceive a transit worker to be acting inappropriately.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Howard Hampton Joins Fasken Martineau
next post
Took 30 years, But Canada Post Employees Win Pay Equity Complaint!

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
42m

FYI, the School of HRM at @yorkuniversity will be hiring up to 2 tenure-stream profs including possibly one at the Associate Professor level.

Jobs will be posted in fall for start July 1, 2023. If you know anyone in the market pass along.

https://www.yorku.ca/laps/shrm/

Reply on Twitter 1558834355442552832Retweet on Twitter 1558834355442552832Like on Twitter 1558834355442552832Twitter 1558834355442552832
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
14h

If one these dimwits was a Sacha Baron Cohen-like comedian playing the role of a Republican would any one notice?

PatriotTakes 🇺🇸@patriottakes

Marjorie Taylor Greene believes generating electricity from “wind turbines and solar panels” will result in the loss of air conditioning and home appliances.

Greene: “I like the lights on. I want to stay up later at night. I don’t want to have to go to bed when the sun sets.”

Reply on Twitter 1558630572783722497Retweet on Twitter 15586305727837224972Like on Twitter 15586305727837224974Twitter 1558630572783722497
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
17h

A student told me she is translating chapters of my book into Korean because she learned a lot and wants it as a reference but English is her second language.

Any Korean speakers out there? What does this say?

일의 법칙

Reply on Twitter 1558595466182393858Retweet on Twitter 1558595466182393858Like on Twitter 15585954661823938582Twitter 1558595466182393858
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.