The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Can You Be Fired for Your Political Beliefs?

by David Doorey January 15, 2014
written by David Doorey January 15, 2014

From January 2014.
The Federal Tories are at it again.  Some obscure backbencher has proposed a Private Members’ Bill ‘with the full support of the Prime Minister’s Office’.  This is the modus operandi of the Harper government when it comes to passing controversial bills.   That and putting changes in giant omnibus bills.  This new Bill C-520 requires a list of specified public employees and contractors, and the catch all “any other positions added” by some future regulation,  to disclose if they hold or intend to hold a “politically partisan position”.  The Bill is attracting considerable criticism already.
This post isn’t really about Bill C-520, but about discrimination on political grounds.  One obvious concern related to that Bill is that an employee or contractor could lose their job or suffer some form of adverse impact once they’ve disclosed their affiliation.  Terminated for their political opinion, belief, or affiliation.  The Federal Public Service Employment Act provides some protection for Federal employees who engage in political activities, provided this does not impair their “ability to perform their job in a politically impartial manner.” That’s not enough for the Tories, apparently.  Other provincial statutes regulate political activity by government employees, such as the Ontario Public Service Act.
But what about private sector employees?  Can they be denied employment or fired for their political beliefs and activities?

The answer depends on whether you are unionized, and on the applicable human rights legislation (or possibly another statute) includes “political belief or opinion” as a prohibited ground of discrimination.  Unionized employees can’t be fired without an actual reason unrelated to the employer’s personal biases, because unions bargain ‘just cause’ provisions to protect workers.  So if you’re unionized, you almost certainly can’t be fired for your political opinions.
However, if you are not unionized, then you CAN be fired for your political reasons–or for any other stupid reason for that matter–unless either you have bargained a contract clause providing others (hardly any employees do so) or a statute prohibits the discrimination.  There is no common law protection against discrimination on the basis of political belief. It might surprise you to learn that a handful of provinces and the Federal jurisdiction do not prohibit discrimination on the basis of political belief.  Here’s a breakdown (see Chapter 27:  What are the Prohibited Grounds of Discrimination? in The Law of Work book for a discussion):

Human Rights Statutes Do Not Include Political Opinion or Belief as a Prohibited Ground of discrimination:

Federal (Canada), Ontario, Nunavet, Alberta, Saskatchewan

Human Rights Statutes Do Prohibit Discrimination on the Basis of Political Opinion or Belief:

Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, PEI, Newfoundland & Labrador, NWT, Yukon, B.C., Manitoba

On a number of occasions, people have tried to argue that political opinion is included within the ground  of ‘creed’, but that argument has not succeeded to date (unless there is a decision from outside Ontario that I have missed–if so, please let me know).  In Ontario, the Court of Appeal has left open the question whether a “a political perspective”, like communism, “made up of a recognizable cohesive belief system or structure” could fall within the scope of creed.  But ‘simple political opinion’ is not included within Creed and so discrimination on that ground is not prohibited by the Human Rights Code.  See discussion in Jazairi v. OHRC, a case involving a York University professor who argued his tenure was denied because of his political beliefs.
A lingering question is whether the ommission of political belief in human rights legislation violates Section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the equality rights section.  That issue came up, but was not decided directly in the Jazairi case.  Section 15 requires that governments to ensure equality before the law on both enumerated and analogous grounds.  There is an argument that “political opinion” should be read into human rights legislation that presently omit it on a similar basis that led to the reading in of “sexual orientation” in the case Vriend v. Alberta.
Questions for Discussion

Can you think of a reason why governments would have left out “political belief” from their human rights legislation?

Is there any justification for prohibiting discrimination based on ‘religious belief’ but not ‘political belief’?  

Does the absence of ‘political belief’ in human rights statutes mean that an employer could ask job applicants who they voted for in the last election, or which political party they support, and then deny employment based not their answer?  If so, do you think that is a sensible approach or not?

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
What if a Male Employee Refuses to Work with Female Coworkers Due to His Religion?
next post
Harvard Law Professor Sachs: On Unbundling Economic & Political Unions

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
8h

Interested in your comment that you don’t have rules. I’d think that submitting an essay written by a machine without citing the machine is just straight up plagiarism.

My view is that any text not written by yourself needs to be fully cited.

Andres Guadamuz @technollama

@shahaoul @glynmoody Indeed. As we don't have rules, we can only mark what's in front of us. I can imagine some students using it judiciously, to get a technical definition for example, but in other cases the result can be an incoherent unstructured essay. So we mark it as that.

Reply on Twitter 1619691956413808640 Retweet on Twitter 1619691956413808640 2 Like on Twitter 1619691956413808640 23 Twitter 1619691956413808640
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
18h

McDonald's president who made $7.4 million last year says proposal to pay fast-food workers $22 an hour is 'costly and job-destroying' https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/mcdonalds-president-who-made-dollar74-million-last-year-says-proposal-to-pay-fast-food-workers-dollar22-an-hour-is-costly-and-job-destroying/ar-AA16Mc7D?ocid=a2hs&li=BBnb7Kz

Reply on Twitter 1619548631421562880 Retweet on Twitter 1619548631421562880 17 Like on Twitter 1619548631421562880 47 Twitter 1619548631421562880
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
18h

Google axes thousands of jobs while rolling in cash on orders from Wall Street pencil pushers. Pretty obvious where public anger should be directed.

https://www.thestar.com/business/opinion/2023/01/28/dont-do-evil-massive-layoffs-at-google-shine-a-light-on-tech-giants-ugly-side.html

Reply on Twitter 1619544883609407488 Retweet on Twitter 1619544883609407488 7 Like on Twitter 1619544883609407488 9 Twitter 1619544883609407488
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.