The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Confusion at York as Some Classes Resume

by David Doorey November 21, 2008
written by David Doorey November 21, 2008

As the strike continues into its third week, cracks are appearing in the University’s ‘no classes’ rule.  The University already exempted some professional ‘executive’ graduate programs in law, business, and human resources.  Now York has also permitted classes to resume at Schulich’s school of business, but only for a few students enrolled in programs that have an exchange requirement, in which students must work for a business off campus.  The concern is that these students may lose their program if courses continue into the period in which they are scheduled to begin work.  Schulich professors will now be required to teach the same course twice: to the exchange students and then to the rest of the class once regular teaching resumes.  Lucky them.
There are students in other faculties in an equivalent position.  The undergrad law students at Osgoode come immediately to mind, since many of them will be expected to begin summer or articling jobs at law firms.  The articling jobs in particular create difficulties because completing a full term of articling is a requirement of being called to the Bar.  I can’t imagine that a flexible solution could not be found to this, but I expect Osgoode to now start harping for a similar exclusion.
Of course, being ‘exempted’ by York’s Senate from the ‘no classes’ policy does not mean that the union approved of classes continuing — it was not a bargained arrangement with the union.  So students and faculty must still cross a legal picket line if they hold classes on campus, and York’s rules on the conduct of strikes prohibits students from being negatively effected in any way for refusing to cross a picket line:

It is important to note that should a student, enrolled in the activities noted as exceptions above, choose to exercise her or his right to not participate in academic activities owing to the strike, they would be entitled to immunity from penalty, to reasonable alternative access to materials covered in their absence, to reasonable extensions of deadlines and to such other remedy as Senate deems necessary and consistent with the principle of academic integrity.

This appears to me to mean that even if a class resumes at York during the strike, no student is required to cross the picket line and attend.  This could create nightmares for the administration (and for profs who begin teaching), since they will somehow have to make up the materials and grading assignments for students who elect not to come to class.   This is why a piecemeal approach to holding classes during lawful strikes is a nightmare.

5 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
COACH: Another Human Rights Violator
next post
Top SSRN Labour & Employment Law Downloads (Nov. 22)

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

TheLawofWork Follow

@ ·
now

Reply on Twitter Retweet on Twitter Like on Twitter Twitter
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.