The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Comment on the NHLPA's Legal Opinion on Cause for Dismissal

by David Doorey October 1, 2009
written by David Doorey October 1, 2009

   There’s a strange employment law drama ongoing at the NHL’s player’s union, the NHLPA.    The NHLPA dismissed its executive director, Paul Kelly this summer, to the surprise and anger of many of the union members (NHL players).  The union alleged cause for dismissal.  Normally when an employer alleges ’cause’ for dismissal, they are doing so to avoid having to pay reasonable (or contractual) notice to the employee.  I couldn’t find anything in the news indicating whether Kelly was given any sort of notice or severance package, and as far as I can tell, Kelly has not yet sued the NHLPA for wrongful dismissal, which is a lawsuit seeking reasonable notice. 
But then the story got weirder.  Because so many union members complained about Kelly’s dismissal, the NHLPA hired Roy McMurtry, ex-Chief Justice of Ontario and now Chancellor of York University, to write a post-facto legal opinion about whether the NHLPA had ’cause’ to dismiss Kelly.  Getting a legal opinion after you have already fired someone for cause is somewhat unorthodox–normally getting that opinion before you fire the person makes more sense.  Nevertheless, luckily for the NHLPA, McMurtry opined that there was cause to dismiss Kelly.  Trouble is, McMurtry has some sort of relationship with Alan Eagleson, who believe it or not was once prosecuted by Kelly (when Kelly was a prosecutor) and impisoned.   
McMurtry is a very smart man, but he probably made a judgement error in taking on this contract, since it unecessarily embarrasses the NHLPA and probably himself.  So now the NHLPA is going to seek a new legal opinion from someone else.  For what purpose, I don’t know.  if the new opinion finds there was no cause, is the NHLPA going to take Kelly back?Whether or not the NHLPA had cause to dismiss Kelly would be a matter for a court to decide at this point, and there is no assurance at all that a court would agree with whatever a lawyer hired by the employer writes in an opinion.  Determing whether there is cause for dismissal of an employee isn’t a science.
Maybe the NHLPA should hire me.  The last line of my legal opinion would be something like this:  “In short, whether a court would find cause for summary dismissal or not is somewhat of a crapshoot.   The misconduct needs to be a serious breach that irreparably undermines the employer’s trust and confidence in the employee.  Courts don’t easily find cause, although sometimes they find cause when there isn’t any….”
Take this recent case from B.C., called Obeng v. Canada Safeway, for example.  Obeng was a store manager who was fired for theft after employees told management that they saw him putting items into a shopping basket.   He was doing that because he was restocking misplaced items on the shelves, but the employees thought he was taking the items home without paying.  The judge found that he actually didn’t steal anything, and that he was simply restocking the shelves.   But the Court nevertheless rules there was cause to dismiss Obeng without notice because he didn’t mention to the employer during the investigation that he was restocking shelves.  As a result, the cause for dismissal was not theft (which is what the employer had actually fired him for), but a failure to explain to the employer that he was doing his job!  
This is a nutty decision, in my opinion.    But it goes to show that cases involving dismissals for cause can be unpredictable.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Strike Saves Toronto $33 Million
next post
Will Unlawful Replacement Refs Be Used This Week in Raptor games?

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 338 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
Retweet on TwitterDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦 Retweeted
jamesbrad263Brad James@jamesbrad263·
7h

@TheLawofWork @OFLabour Thanks for giving me space on your blog last December to bloviate and whine about this broad topic: https://lawofwork.ca/james_whysoquiet/

Reply on Twitter 1559880762480070657Retweet on Twitter 15598807624800706571Like on Twitter 1559880762480070657Twitter 1559880762480070657
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
7h

It is rather striking that the @OFLabour is not leading a charge for improved access to collective bargaining.

Emphasizing improved labor standards over collective bargaining rights.

Brad James@jamesbrad263

Private sector union membership is slipping. Ways to address that could include better rights for employees to form unions (as BC has done) or building a broader-based bargaining system for franchise workers. But those aren't in this list of goals from Ontario's union federation. https://twitter.com/OFLabour/status/1559242326391791616

Reply on Twitter 1559872838995218437Retweet on Twitter 1559872838995218437Like on Twitter 15598728389952184374Twitter 1559872838995218437
Retweet on TwitterDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦 Retweeted
greenhousenytSteven Greenhouse@greenhousenyt·
21h

Breaking- NLRB says workers at Amazon warehouse in Albany NY area file petition for union election for 400 workers to join Amazon Labor Union

Reply on Twitter 1559661375890268163Retweet on Twitter 1559661375890268163182Like on Twitter 1559661375890268163930Twitter 1559661375890268163
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.