Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
Law of Work Archive

Canadian Federation of Independent Business: CEO Pay "Out of Control"!

by David Doorey January 12, 2012
written by David Doorey January 12, 2012


There was an interesting little panel discussion on BNN this afternoon about collective bargaining in 2012. The most interesting part is Catherine Swift’s comment about CEO pay. Swift is the ubiquitous face of the business lobby group, the Canadian Federation of Independent Business.  She is usually heard trumpeting the greatness of free market forces and chastising all forms of government (and union) intervention in the employment relationship.  For my students, she would fit into the Neoclassical Perspective.  So I almost choked on my latte when she said in today’s interview the following:

“Some CEO pay is out of control.  I’m a free marketer, but at what point do you say it is too much?”

That’s a very good question, Catherine, one that the labour movement among others have been asking for some time.   
But you can’t have it both ways.  The notion of an executive being overpaid is nonsensical if you believe that free markets operate as our neoclassical economic friends want us to believe.  An executive is worth whatever he (it’s virtually always a he) the corporation agrees to pay him; he is receiving the “market rate”, just like a worker who earns $5 per hour is “worth” $5 per hour.  In the case of executive compensation, there is no nasty union ‘artificially’ raises the compensation through the exercise of coercive poers, and no silly legislation fixing that rate at a level other than the market rate.  Executive compensation is unrestained by any forces other than market forces, and individual greed  of course (which is a positive trait, after all.  Gordon Gecko told us that).  Therefore, to speak of “overcompensation” speaks of a need for regulatory reform of imperfect labour markets, which no sane believer in the free market would ever dare utter in public.
But wait. Even Richard Posner, one of the Godfathers of neoclassical law and economics concedes now that executive compensation doesn’t operate within the constraints of the ivy tower noeclassical economical model. According to Posner, the theoretical competitive forces that are supposed to ensure that executives are paid their worth are simply not at play in the real world.  So Catherine is right in saying that executive compensation is out of control, it is just that I doubt the business community is real fond of her saying on national television that market forces don’t work in setting compensation.
Then then she went even further, and suggested some business executives “should be in jail” for their behaviour in destroying the economy back in 2008!  [at about the 8:50 minute point of the video].  O.M.G.!  Our system of compensating executives allows greedy CEO’s to take home ‘out of control’ amounts of compensation?  Business executives should be jailed?  Of course, again she is absolutely correct (have you seen Inside Job?), but these just are not words you will often here from the spokespeople for the business community.  You go, Cathy!  Canada Labour Congress, offer this woman a job!
Watch the panel discussion here.
So, I assume now politicians can count on Swift and the CFIB to support calls for legislative reforms to legislate executive pay?  Perhaps the CFIB will support the proposal to link executive pay to average employee wages in the form of mandatory maximum ratio?  At least, the CFIB should support following the American lead, and require corporations to just report the ratio of CEO pay to average employee pay?  Right?  Hello…

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is the Director of the School of HRM at York and Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and on the Advisory Board of the Osgoode Certificate program in Labour Law. He is a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program and a member of the International Advisory Committee on Harvard University’s Clean Slate Project, which is re-imaging labor law for the 21st century

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
Should the Canadian Labour Movement Provide Dental, Health Insurance to Canadian Workers Directly?
next post
The Anatomy of a Work Stoppage? An Ongoing Account of Toronto's Sad Labour Relations With CUPE, Local 416

You may also like

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

A Successful Strike Vote is All That Stands...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Putin Invites Trump to Moscow for Second Meeting...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 218 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
7h

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211852Twitter 1364627677785821185
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
7h

Here's my latest in @jacobinmag.

If Ontario's labor laws applied in Alabama, the Amazon vote would have been held months ago so workers could get back to their jobs. Instead, the NLRA permits Amazon to conduct a months' long onslaught of anti-union propaganda. https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1364613560425275392

Jacobin@jacobinmag

Amazon workers in Alabama are voting on whether to unionize, but the company is bombarding them with anti-union propaganda. In Canada, by contrast, votes are held quickly, making it harder for companies to stack the deck — a model that can work in the US. http://jacobinmag.com/2021/02/amazon-alabama-canada-labor-law-union-vote

Reply on Twitter 1364623976174092316Retweet on Twitter 13646239761740923168Like on Twitter 136462397617409231613Twitter 1364623976174092316
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
9h

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364605259071561730Retweet on Twitter 13646052590715617304Like on Twitter 13646052590715617304Twitter 1364605259071561730
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.