The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Can you tell your friends about the terms of your Human Rights complaint settlement?

by David Doorey January 18, 2011
written by David Doorey January 18, 2011

You file a human rights complaint against your employer, and the complaint ends up getting settled.  Perhaps your employer gives you some money, in exchange for the complaint being dropped.  This happens all the time.  Often, the employer insists on some sort of non-disclosure term in the settlement agreement.  The purpose of this clause is to stop the employee from running around telling everyone what the settlement was.  The employer usually will not admit any wrongdoing, and doesn’t want the employee telling people that the employer gave her money, since that may suggest to people that the employer was admitting to guilt.
Human Rights codes usually include a provision for enforcement of these settlements.  In Ontario, is is section 45.9, which gives the Tribunal power to consider a complaint that a party has violated a settlement.   If the complaint is that a party violated the non-disclosure part of the settlement, then the issue will be what the non-disclosure covered, and what the person said.  A very strong non-disclosure clause will prohibit the employee from disclosing the fact of a settlement or the content of the settlement.  In other words, the employee can’t talk about the settlement at all.   But sometimes the non-disclosure term is not so clear.
That was the case in a decision released last week by the Ontario HR Tribunal involving a Canadian Tire store. The non-disclosure clause there said that the parties will maintain “strict confidentiality of the terms of these Minutes of Settlement”, and that the employee “shall not discuss or disclose the terms of this settlement with anyone other than” her spouse.  Afterwards, the employee told another Canadian Tire employee that she had file a complaint against the employer and that the complaint had been settled.  Canadian Tire brought a complaints under Section 45.9 alleging that the employee had violated the settlement agreement by disclosing that a settlement had been breached, and that also that by disclosing the existence of a settlement, the employee has “disparaged” the employer.
The Tribunal said nice try, employer, but the settlement very clearly says that the employee can’t disclose the “terms” of the settlement.  Disclosing that there was a settlement is not the same thing as disclosing the terms of a settlement:

The language of article 8 sets out an obligation to maintain the confidentiality of the “terms” of the Minutes of Settlement. The agreement did not prohibit a party from disclosing the fact that there was a settlement. Accordingly, there was no breach if the applicant disclosed merely that there was a settlement…   I note that it is open to parties to negotiate into settlements exactly what a party should say if asked a question about the Tribunal Application. Parties may also negotiate language that prohibits either party from talking about the fact of the claim or the settlement.

The employer’s complaint was dismissed.  The Tribunal basically told the employer that if they wanted a gag on telling people there was a settlement, then they should have included that in the settlement.

By the way, what remedy do you think the Tribunal would have ordered had it found that the employee did violate the settlement agreement?  Section 45.9(8) gives the Tribunal power to “make any order that it considers appropriate to remedy the circumstances” when a breach of a settlement is found.   Should the employee be required to repay any money that Canadian Tire might have paid her in the settlement?

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
John Crispo Public Policy Forum on Labour Issue – This Wednesday
next post
Jotwell Worklaw: Cool New Website Blog on Employment Law Stuff

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 338 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
Retweet on TwitterDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦 Retweeted
AnthonyForsyt10Anthony Forsyth@AnthonyForsyt10·
2h

If you missed my ⁦@RMIT⁩ lecture on Tuesday here is the text with a recording to follow … Legislating to Rebuild Worker Power: The Industrial Relations Reforms We Need from the Albanese Labor Government - Labour Law Down Under ⁦⁦@RMITCoBL⁩ https://labourlawdownunder.com.au/?p=1042

Reply on Twitter 1560086376703750144Retweet on Twitter 15600863767037501444Like on Twitter 156008637670375014410Twitter 1560086376703750144
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
6h

Old law school friend now works as a lawyer in the Office of the JAG. She is doing basic training, getting crazy fit. I wasn’t aware these lawyers must basically go thru basic training.

Imagine if there was a fitness test for labour and employment lawyers?

Reply on Twitter 1560028418015522817Retweet on Twitter 1560028418015522817Like on Twitter 15600284180155228178Twitter 1560028418015522817
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
6h

You’ve seen this article?

Adrienne Cuoto, ‘Clothing Exotic Dancers with Collective Bargaining Rights’, 2006 38-1 Ottawa Law Review 37, 2006 CanLIIDocs 63, <https://canlii.ca/t/2913>

ryan white@ryandwhite12

One of my COVID projects has been working on a history of the Canadian Association of Burlesque Entertainers, the only case I am aware of in which dancers sought unionization in Canada - so I will be watching this carefully (it is rare and exciting) https://twitter.com/grimkim/status/1559995539999031297

Reply on Twitter 1560023264759615499Retweet on Twitter 15600232647596154991Like on Twitter 1560023264759615499Twitter 1560023264759615499
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.