The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Can Catholic School Suspend or Dismiss a Lesbian Teacher?

by David Doorey April 30, 2010
written by David Doorey April 30, 2010

There’s a story from B.C. about a lesbian teacher at a Catholic girls’ school called Little Flower Academy who was told not to return to work after the employer and parents of the students learned she was a lesbian.   She claims that the school told her that the parents were concerned she would corrupt their daughters.  I presume that means that they thought she would ‘make them gay’ or, gasp, suggest to them that lesbians are not all evil.  Apparently the employer has continued to pay her, but won’t let her come to work.  Sounds like a suspension with pay.
The story doesn’t say that she has filed a human rights complaint.  It appears she did a press release instead.  The story says that the Minister of Education is ‘looking into’ her allegations.  That’s kinda weird.  Why wouldn’t the Minister just advise her to use the proper legal mechanism, which would be the Human Rights Code of B.C., which is very much like the Ontario Code?  Has the employer violated the Code by telling a lesbian employee not to come to work because parents of students don’t want their daughter exposed to a lesbian?
First thing to decide is whether ‘lesbian’ is a protected ground of discrimination, because the Code only governs protected grounds, it doesn’t ban all types of discrimination.  Take a look at Section 13, the key employment section:

1) A person must not
(a) refuse to employ or refuse to continue to employ a person, or
(b) discriminate against a person regarding employment or any term or condition of employment
because of the race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, political belief, religion, marital status, family status, physical or mental disability, sex, sexual orientation or age of that person or because that person has been convicted of a criminal or summary conviction offence that is unrelated to the employment or to the intended employment of that person.

Is being a lesbian a protected ground?
If it is, then has the employer violated the Code?  Do you think refusing an employee the right to come to work (but continuing to pay them) is “discrimination” in regards to employment or any term of employment?
If the treatment of the lesbian teacher is discrimination on the basis of a prohibited ground, then it is illegal, unless there is some defense for the employer in the Code.  Sometimes human rights codes allow certain types of discrimination on prohibited grounds.  What defenses are available in the B.C. Code?  Keep reading Section 13:

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply
(a) as it relates to age, to a bona fide scheme based on seniority, or
(b) as it relates to marital status, physical or mental disability, sex or age, to the operation of a bona fide retirement, superannuation or pension plan or to a bona fide group or employee insurance plan, whether or not the plan is the subject of a contract of insurance between an insurer and an employer.
(4) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply with respect to a refusal, limitation, specification or preference based on a bona fide occupational requirement.

Does the Catholic school have a defense in this language?   Well, 3(a) doesn’t apply, nor does 3(b).  So the employer’s only hope would be (4), which says, essentially, that an employer can treat lesbians differently if not being a lesbian is a “bona fide occupational requirement” (BFOR).  BFOR is not defined in the B.C. Code, so you would need to do legal research of the case law to figure out what the courts and the human rights Tribunal have said it means.  The most important case on that point is the “Meiorin” decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, in which the Court explained how this part of the B.C. works.  That case tells us that, to justify its rule that lesbians can’t teach at the school,  the employer would need meet a three-step test:

1.  That the rule is there for a purpose rationally connected to the performance of the job (not being a lesbian is related to proper performance of the job).
2.   That the rule was adopted  in an honest and good faith belief that it was necessary to the fulfillment of that legitimate work-related purpose; and
3.  That the standard is reasonably necessary to the accomplishment of that legitimate purpose. To show that the standard is reasonably necessary, it must be demonstrated that it is impossible to accommodate individual employees sharing the characteristics of the claimant without imposing undue hardship upon the employer (p 298).

Do you think that the Catholic school could meet this test?  Do you think that a Catholic school should be permitted to ban gays and lesbians from the workplace?  What if the Catholic Church proclaimed that being a lesbian/gay is a sin in the eyes of their God?  Should religious discrimination be exempted from human rights laws?

5 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Get an LLM in Labour & Employment Law: Last Chance
next post
Employees, Independent Contractors, and Those In Between

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
8h

If one these dimwits was a Sacha Baron Cohen-like comedian playing the role of a Republican would any one notice?

PatriotTakes 🇺🇸@patriottakes

Marjorie Taylor Greene believes generating electricity from “wind turbines and solar panels” will result in the loss of air conditioning and home appliances.

Greene: “I like the lights on. I want to stay up later at night. I don’t want to have to go to bed when the sun sets.”

Reply on Twitter 1558630572783722497Retweet on Twitter 15586305727837224972Like on Twitter 15586305727837224974Twitter 1558630572783722497
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
10h

A student told me she is translating chapters of my book into Korean because she learned a lot and wants it as a reference but English is her second language.

Any Korean speakers out there? What does this say?

일의 법칙

Reply on Twitter 1558595466182393858Retweet on Twitter 1558595466182393858Like on Twitter 1558595466182393858Twitter 1558595466182393858
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
10h

I have no idea who this person is or what is going on in Peterborough.

There’s a world of crazy around me that I’m missing.

Caryma Sa'd - Lawyer + Political Satirist@CarymaRules

Romana Didulo provides entertainment for the thinned out crowd in the form of her favourite song, Rasputin.

#cdnpoli #Peterborough #QAnon

Reply on Twitter 1558592062097956865Retweet on Twitter 1558592062097956865Like on Twitter 15585920620979568653Twitter 1558592062097956865
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.