The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Arthurs on "Labour Law After Labour"

by David Doorey March 24, 2011
written by David Doorey March 24, 2011

Our colleague here at York and Canada’s foremost labour law scholar, Harry Arthurs, has published another sweeping review of labour law’s past, present, and future.  This one is called “Labour Law After Labour”, available here. Harry explains the decline in “labour law” as a function of several factors, including working people’s abandonment of “class” as a defining feature of their lives.  Workers align themselves more closely with family, occupation, religion, gender, and age than with “class”, which explains why we see so many working people voting for political parties that support policies that in fact are detrimental to their interests as workers–how else can you explain factory workers who vote for parties who support corporate tax cuts and weakening of labour laws.  If workers themselves aren’t pushing for stronger labour rights and labour movements then it is predictable that these things will fall from the political, economic, and social landscape.
Harry notes that it is during “crisis” that focus turns to “ideas”.  So he looks around at what “ideas” are emerging to explain what labour law is for today, and in the future.   He identifies three options:
1.    Labour Law will be embedded in a regime of fundamental universal human rights. We see movement in this direction in recent Supreme Court decisions that have related “freedom of association” in the Charter to core principles in International Labour Organization instruments.  Harry is skeptical about the value to workers of going this route.
2.   Labour Law should empower workers by accumulating “human capital”. This refers to the idea of abandoning the traditional role of labour law as protector of employee interests through addressing bargaining power and instead focusing on systems that would better enable workers to attain transferable skills and encourage employers to adopt progressive mutual gains workplace practices.  Harry notes that to work properly, this strategy requires strong state investment and involvement, something he doubts North American governments will buy into.
3.  The purpose of Labour Law should remain unchanged:  enable workers to mobilize and seek justice in the workplace. Harry claims that for this to happen, “labour law” needs to be more ambitious, it needs to explore all aspects of the economy and society that influence work in all forms.  This will require new types of worker collectives beyond traditional unions, and new broader based strategies to tackle the growing power of capital.  Again, Harry is skeptical about whether this can happen in the North American climate.
In typical Harry fashion, despite the gloomy prognosis in the article, he concludes on an optimistic tone:

Still, for their possible shortcomings, these three new approaches represent not only the best approximation of what labour law is likely to look like ‘after labour’ but also a significant advance over what it looks like today.

 
 
 
 

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Moxies: Where "Uglies" Need Not Apply?
next post
Does Sears Have a Policy of Falsely Alleging Cause for Dismissal?

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
16h

A Nationwide Bargaining Unit to Fight Starbucks Is a Moon Shot Worth Trying

My latest on ⁦@jacobin⁩. https://jacobin.com/2022/08/starbucks-service-unions-nlrb-law-centralized-bargaining/

Reply on Twitter 1556339370461786112Retweet on Twitter 15563393704617861122Like on Twitter 155633937046178611211Twitter 1556339370461786112
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
20h

Luck is part of it for sure. Right time right place. True of a lot of jobs not just academia.

But in my experience sitting on lots of academic hiring committees, people selected have superior CVs. 60 applicants, one position. Not all luck. It’s a very competitive job market.

David Webster@dwebsterhist

I've been hired for 2 tenure track jobs and been on multiple committees, sent in more than 100 job applications, and done multiple interviews. Here is my thread 🛢
of job market advice for early career academics based on decades of experience:

1. Get lucky.

Reply on Twitter 1556285407817506817Retweet on Twitter 1556285407817506817Like on Twitter 15562854078175068171Twitter 1556285407817506817
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
6 Aug

Sunflowers!

Reply on Twitter 1556032894640037890Retweet on Twitter 1556032894640037890Like on Twitter 15560328946400378905Twitter 1556032894640037890
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.