The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Another Twist on Neutrality Agreements

by David Doorey May 12, 2008
written by David Doorey May 12, 2008

Thanks to Workplace Prof Blog for posting this story about a neutrality agreement in the U.S. involving two unions, SEIU and United-Here, and two employers, Sodexo Inc. and Compass Group.  The agreement permits the employers to decide which locations the unions can seek to organize and also imposes a quota on the number of employees who can be organized.  The unions also agree not to strike.  In exchange, the employers will remain neutral and not try to persaude the employees to reject the unions.  An odd twist in this agreement is that the details of deal, including how the permitted sites are selected, must remain secret.  Here in Canada, we saw recently the CAW bargain a neutrality agreement with Magna in which Magna permited CAW organizers onto its property to organize workers and agreed to voluntarily recognize the union if a majority of workers in a factory voted for the union.  In exchange, the CAW agreed not to strike and to include in the collective agreement a variety of administrative and grievance structures that Magna uses in its non-union facilities.
These agreements are clearly designed to bolster union density rates at a time when unions on both sides of the border are facing an organizing crisis.  There are a variety of interesting legal issues related to these sorts of agreements (you can read about some of them in my paper on neutrality agreements).   For example, in Ontario, labour legislation prohibits employers from providing “any support” to a union during an organizing campaign.  If an employer does so, any resulting collective agreement is rendered void.   Why do you think that law exists?
Do you think the employers in the SEIU-United Here agreement provided above would be providing “support” to the unions under Ontario law?  What about Magna, when it invites the CAW organizers into its factories and encourages its employees to support the CAW?  Should the law prevent these sorts of voluntary agreements between unions and employers?

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Happy Mothers' Day
next post
It's a Dirty Job…

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

TheLawofWork Follow

@ ·
now

Reply on Twitter Retweet on Twitter Like on Twitter Twitter
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Tax Law
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.