The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Annnnd… The Labour Law Pendulum Swings Back Again

by David Doorey June 14, 2017
written by David Doorey June 14, 2017

There’s a well-known adage in labour law circles that politically driven, ideological legal reforms that sway too far from the established centre, too far in favour or against collective bargaining, will have a short shelf life.

Bill C-4 Would Undo Conservative Laws Designed to Undermine Unions

Bill C-4 Would Undo Conservative Laws Designed to Undermine Unions


Inevitably, when a new political party comes to power, the pendulum will swing back.
Sustainable labour law reform is preceded by a thoughtful, well-researched process designed to respond to real economic and justice concerns, as well as non-partisan participation by key industrial relations actors that leads to reforms that are respected (not necessary liked in all regards) by employers and unions alike.  The Ontario Liberals attempted to go this route when they appointed senior, highly respected representatives of both the union and management bar to lead their Changing Workplaces Review.
The Harper Conservatives’ open disdain for unions and unionized workers made this sort of balanced reform impossible during their rein in power in Ottawa.  Their very transparent agenda was to undermine unions, which they perceived as a political foe and thorn in their side.
Bye, Bye C-377, An Act to Make Unions Produce and Disclose Reams of Useless Information
And so it comes as no surprise that the federal Liberal’s Bill C-4 has almost made its way through Parliament.  Today is past through the Senate.  Bill C-4 will repeal the highly controversial, partisan and transparent attempt by the former Conservative government to single out a political foe, unions, for special negative treatment under the Income Tax Act.   Regular readers of this little law blog recall several posts about Bill C-377 back in 2013, including this one quoting a classic tirade against the partisan nature of the Bill by (now former) Senator Hugh Segal.
Bill C-377 buried unions, and only unions, in piles of red tape by requiring them to annual submit to the government reams of information about how they spend money and what employees do at work.   Look at Section 149.1 (3) of the current Income Tax Act to see what information the Conservative’s made unions — and only unions — disclose to the public.    Bill C-4 simply repeals that section.
Welcome Back Card-Check Union Certification 
Bill C-4 also re-introduces the card-check model of union certification that had been in effect in the Canada Labour Code for some 50 odd years until the Harper government.   The Conservative’s introduced mandatory union certification ballots, as provincial Conservative governments have tended to do whenever they are in power in Canada over the past 25 years.  Studies demonstrate that unions have a more difficult time organizing new workers under the mandatory vote model than under the card-check model.
With Bill C-4’s return to card-check, I will need to once again amend Table 39.1 (Table 8.1 if you are using only the Collective Bargaining Regime edition) in The Law of Work.  Once Bill C-4 comes into effect, 6 out of 11 Canadian jurisdictions will have some form of card-check union certification in effect, as shown in the Figure (Source:  D. Doorey, The Law of Work: Complete Edition, p. 535).
Screen Shot 2017-05-29 at 3.43.12 PM

That’s one of the great things about studying work law.  There is always change.

Keeps us text book writers on our feet.

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Bill 148: On Enforcement of ESA Compliance and a Missed Opportunity?
next post
The First Labour Law Research Network Festive in Prince Edward County is a Wrap

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

TheLawofWork Follow

@ ·
now

Reply on Twitter Retweet on Twitter Like on Twitter Twitter
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.