The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

American Union Busting Firm Comes to Canada

by David Doorey January 25, 2010
written by David Doorey January 25, 2010

There’s an American consulting company called Projections that claims to have been helping American employers ‘remain union free’ for thirty years.   Even union busting consultants need to grow, so Projections has come out with some videos directed at Canadian companies (as if Canadian employers need help from Americans on how to remain union free!  The nerve ….).
Here’s their Canadian website. It doesn’t say much, so you’d have to order the movies.  It does have lots of pictures of mean looking people who I assume are actors pretending to be union members.  Scaaaarrrrry stuff.  This is from their pitch to Canadian employers:

Delivered in a conversational tone, this union avoidance video educates employees, providing them with the basis for an informed decision. All “It’s Your Choice” videos can be shipped overnight from inside Canada, so there’s no delay in delivery. Specific versions are available for Ontario, British Columbia, and Alberta and come in both manufacturing and non-manufacturing environments

Wow, province specific advise on how to keep unions out.  I think I will order the videos, maybe use them as a teaching aid in my class.  Apparently, some Canadian law firms helped them prepare these videos.  Now why would a management side labour lawyer want to promote videos like this?   Isn’t advising employers how to remain non-union part of their core business?  If all you need is an American-made movie, who needs a labour lawyer?   Projections also has a blog.
What do you think of companies like this, who profit by trying to discourage workers from joining unions?   Consider that joining a union and engaging in collective bargaining is considered to be a fundamental human right in both Canada and under international human rights law.  Is there something sleezy about an industry whose service is to discourage people from exercising their fundamental human rights?  Or is union avoidance consulting a respectable business that simply seeks to inform employees of their rights so they can make informed choices?

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is a Full Professor of Work Law and Labour Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Are Disabled People Writing the LSAT entitled to Accommodation?
next post
Apply to Osgoode Hall`s LLM in Labour & Employment Law

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018


Follow Us On Social Media

Substack
Bluesky

BlueSky Latest Posts

No posts available.

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Tax Law
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.