Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
Law of Work Archive

Air Canada Fiasco: A Final Wrap Up

by David Doorey October 14, 2011
written by David Doorey October 14, 2011

Alright, we’ve had just about enough talk this week about Air Canada and it is time to move on to other topics. However, since I am using this Blog in part to build a reference library for my students and research for my upcoming textbook on Canadian Workplace Law and Policy, I will do a final wrap by referring to some of the many news stories from the last 72 hours.
There’s an editorial from the Globe and Mail telling the government to “stop meddling in Air Canada’s labour dispute”.
Here is an interesting piece in today’s Ottawa Citizen exploring how the Government has set a very nice fact scenario for the Charter challenge we all anticipate that will explore whether there is a constitutional right to strike. The fact that the government is hurriedly legislating back workers in the absence of any evidence of harm to Canadians, while imposing arbitration processes tilted in the employer’s favour, and in the case of Canada Post, actually legislating wage levels below what the employer had already offered, create a perfect set of facts to test how far a government can go in preventing free collective bargaining and the right to strike.  I am quoted, along with Professor Brian Langille, my colleague here at York, Eric Tucker, and distinguished labour lawyer Paul Cavalluzzo, among others.
From the CBC, an interesting article that considers whether government intervention in bargaining actually helps employers. It cites Tucker and Langille again, but also my old law school buddy Erin Kuzz, who is an employer side labour lawyer at Sherrard Kuzz. She argues that while employers might like that governments intervene and reduce or eliminate worker power (the threat of a strike), in the end the government’s interventions may destabilize collective bargaining in ways that are not at all good for employers.  It is better, says Kuzz, for employers to bargain a deal, than to have disputes sent to arbitration, where the results are unpredictable and often favour the workers more than the usual strike route would.
Here is a Toronto Star story discussing the new bad faith bargaining complaint filed by Air Canada against CUPE.  Apparently, Air Canada has decided that poisoning the workplace climate even more than it already is makes for good strategy.  The complaint is apparently that it is illegal for a union bargaining committee to have a proposed collective agreement that it recommends voted down by the membership.  Good luck with that one, Air Canada.  I’m sure it will improve your relationship with employees immeasurably.
A Canadian Press story discussing the Minister’s ploy of pretending that there is a health and safety issue so she could use the essential services section of the Labour Code to stop the strike (quoting me and Ian Lee of Carelton).
If you have other stories or comments on the Air Canada situation, please pass them along using the Comment feature.  Air Canada will no doubt be back in the news shortly when the government introduces yet another piece of back to work legislation–unless of course the parties resolve the dispute before then.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is the Director of the School of HRM at York and Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and on the Advisory Board of the Osgoode Certificate program in Labour Law. He is a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program and a member of the International Advisory Committee on Harvard University’s Clean Slate Project, which is re-imaging labor law for the 21st century

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
Why Minister Raitt is Legally Correct, But Morally Wrong
next post
Can Employers Ban Employees from Discussing Their Compensation Levels with Other Employees?

You may also like

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

A Successful Strike Vote is All That Stands...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Putin Invites Trump to Moscow for Second Meeting...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 218 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
18h

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211853Twitter 1364627677785821185
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
19h

Here's my latest in @jacobinmag.

If Ontario's labor laws applied in Alabama, the Amazon vote would have been held months ago so workers could get back to their jobs. Instead, the NLRA permits Amazon to conduct a months' long onslaught of anti-union propaganda. https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1364613560425275392

Jacobin@jacobinmag

Amazon workers in Alabama are voting on whether to unionize, but the company is bombarding them with anti-union propaganda. In Canada, by contrast, votes are held quickly, making it harder for companies to stack the deck — a model that can work in the US. http://jacobinmag.com/2021/02/amazon-alabama-canada-labor-law-union-vote

Reply on Twitter 1364623976174092316Retweet on Twitter 13646239761740923168Like on Twitter 136462397617409231613Twitter 1364623976174092316
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
20h

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364605259071561730Retweet on Twitter 13646052590715617304Like on Twitter 13646052590715617304Twitter 1364605259071561730
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.