The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Air Canada Fiasco: A Final Wrap Up

by David Doorey October 14, 2011
written by David Doorey October 14, 2011

Alright, we’ve had just about enough talk this week about Air Canada and it is time to move on to other topics. However, since I am using this Blog in part to build a reference library for my students and research for my upcoming textbook on Canadian Workplace Law and Policy, I will do a final wrap by referring to some of the many news stories from the last 72 hours.
There’s an editorial from the Globe and Mail telling the government to “stop meddling in Air Canada’s labour dispute”.
Here is an interesting piece in today’s Ottawa Citizen exploring how the Government has set a very nice fact scenario for the Charter challenge we all anticipate that will explore whether there is a constitutional right to strike. The fact that the government is hurriedly legislating back workers in the absence of any evidence of harm to Canadians, while imposing arbitration processes tilted in the employer’s favour, and in the case of Canada Post, actually legislating wage levels below what the employer had already offered, create a perfect set of facts to test how far a government can go in preventing free collective bargaining and the right to strike.  I am quoted, along with Professor Brian Langille, my colleague here at York, Eric Tucker, and distinguished labour lawyer Paul Cavalluzzo, among others.
From the CBC, an interesting article that considers whether government intervention in bargaining actually helps employers. It cites Tucker and Langille again, but also my old law school buddy Erin Kuzz, who is an employer side labour lawyer at Sherrard Kuzz. She argues that while employers might like that governments intervene and reduce or eliminate worker power (the threat of a strike), in the end the government’s interventions may destabilize collective bargaining in ways that are not at all good for employers.  It is better, says Kuzz, for employers to bargain a deal, than to have disputes sent to arbitration, where the results are unpredictable and often favour the workers more than the usual strike route would.
Here is a Toronto Star story discussing the new bad faith bargaining complaint filed by Air Canada against CUPE.  Apparently, Air Canada has decided that poisoning the workplace climate even more than it already is makes for good strategy.  The complaint is apparently that it is illegal for a union bargaining committee to have a proposed collective agreement that it recommends voted down by the membership.  Good luck with that one, Air Canada.  I’m sure it will improve your relationship with employees immeasurably.
A Canadian Press story discussing the Minister’s ploy of pretending that there is a health and safety issue so she could use the essential services section of the Labour Code to stop the strike (quoting me and Ian Lee of Carelton).
If you have other stories or comments on the Air Canada situation, please pass them along using the Comment feature.  Air Canada will no doubt be back in the news shortly when the government introduces yet another piece of back to work legislation–unless of course the parties resolve the dispute before then.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Why Minister Raitt is Legally Correct, But Morally Wrong
next post
Can Employers Ban Employees from Discussing Their Compensation Levels with Other Employees?

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
29m

Contract Law folks:

Story: @KDTrey5 (Kevin Durant) demands 'fire coach Nash' or trade me! [Or else what? Durant will breach his own contract by not working? Unclear].

Could Nash argue tort of inducing breach of contract?

Could Nash/Nets argue tort of intimidation?

Discuss.

Shams Charania@ShamsCharania

In a meeting with Nets owner Joe Tsai, Kevin Durant reiterated his trade request and informed Tsai that Tsai needs to choose between Durant or the pairing of general manager Sean Marks and coach Steve Nash, sources say.

Story: https://theathletic.com/3485297/2022/08/08/kevin-durant-nets-trade-steve-nash/

Reply on Twitter 1556730963077521408Retweet on Twitter 1556730963077521408Like on Twitter 1556730963077521408Twitter 1556730963077521408
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
48m

This is not streamed I take it?

Not all of us get to hang out in L.A. 😀

Barry Eidlin@eidlin

Interrupting the fashion report to invite people to a discussion I’m moderating tomorrow (8/9) at noon at #ASA2022 on the future of collective bargaining in the US, feat. @veenadubal, Bill Gould & @JLotesta. Should be great!

Reply on Twitter 1556726348865015809Retweet on Twitter 1556726348865015809Like on Twitter 15567263488650158091Twitter 1556726348865015809
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
3h

Looks great!

I took an international labor law course at LSE/Kings College taught by Keith Ewing, Brian Bercusson, Aileen McColgan, and Paul Davies.

Incredible course. And so important.

Desiree LeClercq@LeclercqDesiree

Excited to teach my new #internationallaborlaw course critically considering how labor rights are designed & enforced. The class balances decolonial theory w/ practical experiences. My syllabus (with names redacted) below. 1/

Reply on Twitter 1556698559650603008Retweet on Twitter 15566985596506030081Like on Twitter 15566985596506030086Twitter 1556698559650603008
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.