The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

1 Job + 1 Job = No Job

by David Doorey July 3, 2008
written by David Doorey July 3, 2008

Did you catch this story about the Revenue Canada lawyer in Toronto who accepted a second job in Ottawa without telling either employer that she had another job.   She claimed she was trying out the Ottawa job to see if she wanted to take it full time and quit the Toronto job.  To hide the Ottawa job from her Toronto employer, she took vacation time and then called in sick and apparently submitted doctors’ letters (which were obviously not accurate).   When the employers found out what was going on, they both fired her.  She then filed a grievance against the Toronto employer, which was dismissed by a federal adjudicator.  
Lying to your employer about reasons for absence is obviously serious dishonesty.   What if this woman had simply used her vacation time from the Toronto job to try out the Ottawa job for a couple of weeks (and not falsely called in sick)?  Would the Toronto employer have had grounds for dismissal then? 

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Pleadings: Wal-Mart Canada v. USWA
next post
Illegal Immigration and the Labour Market

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
1h

Name an institution that respects freedom of expression more than universities.

Chanel Pfahl 🇨🇦 @ChanLPfa

“A @PierrePoilievre government will not only repeal the censorship bill C-11, but we will require every university that gets federal funds to commit itself to honouring the freedom of expression that we are guaranteed in our Charter of Rights.” #CSFN23 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639053857836679168

Reply on Twitter 1639141695983067137 Retweet on Twitter 1639141695983067137 1 Like on Twitter 1639141695983067137 3 Twitter 1639141695983067137
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
3h

Got me some pretty fine tickets to the @Canucks v @SanJoseSharks.

Reply on Twitter 1639110564260765696 Retweet on Twitter 1639110564260765696 Like on Twitter 1639110564260765696 4 Twitter 1639110564260765696
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
10h

The Hall and Oates defence is a classic. Even if it failed.

ryan white @ryandwhite12

@TheLawofWork My response to posts like this is always to go back to an old Slotnick decision from 2002 in which a TTC employee tried to get reinstated by arguing he didn't threat a supervisor, he was just singing Hall and Oates man...

Reply on Twitter 1639003611433762818 Retweet on Twitter 1639003611433762818 1 Like on Twitter 1639003611433762818 1 Twitter 1639003611433762818
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.