The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Deadbeat Employer Gets Jail Time

by David Doorey April 9, 2013
written by David Doorey April 9, 2013

Another deadbeat employer has been sentenced to 90 days in jail by an Ontario Court for stealing his employee’s wages, according to a witness who was in the court room.  There are no written reasons yet.  The MOL will probably post a notice soon.
This time it is a guy named Peter Check, who hired students to work as lifeguards during summer school breaks, and then didn’t pay them. Here is a Toronto Star piece from 2010 peter checkdescribing the offences.  After each season, Check would disband the company and disappear or claim bankruptcy for the company.  Next season, he would open up a new business under a different name and rip off a new batch of employees all over again.  The Ministry of Labour tried to place writs on Check’s property, but most of the property, including his house, were placed in his wife’s name.  In total, he owed nearly $70,000 in unpaid wages.
In Court yesterday, the judge sentenced Check to 90 days in jail, plus ordered him to pay the wages owing, and a $15,000 fine, according to someone who was in the courtroom at the time the sentence was read into the record.  I will post the MOL notice, and written decision once they are available.
I’ve written before about how the power exists to imprison wage stealing employers, yet that power isn’t used very often.  Here is a decision in regards to another wage thief, Steven Blondin, who last year was also sentenced to a 90 day jail term.  The key there was that, despite many opportunities to comply with the order of restitution (to pay the employees the amounts owed), the defendant had failed to do so.  People only get jailed for ESA offences when they demonstrate that they do not accept responsibility and they make no effort to comply with orders to pay.
The power to jail ESA violators in Section 132 of the Employment Standards Act.  Maybe we are witnessing a movement towards a greater willingness to use this power? I’ve said before that legislation should prohibit people who have been convicted under the ESA should be denied the right to register a business or create a corporation or act as a principle of a business.
Issue for Discussion

Do you agree with imprisoning ESA violators? Is this too harsh?

What other tools should exist to discourage and punish repeat wage thieves?

6 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is a Full Professor of Work Law and Labour Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Time for Transparency on the Temporary Foreign Worker Program
next post
The Conservative Temporary Foreign Labour Program Fiasco

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018


Follow Us On Social Media

Substack
Bluesky

BlueSky Latest Posts

No posts available.

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Tax Law
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.