The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

CAW Rally Today for Improved Severance Pay Protections

by David Doorey March 24, 2009
written by David Doorey March 24, 2009

 I have noted before that employees usually get screwed out of their severance pay when their employer goes bankrupt, because employees are ranked lower down the pecking order of creditors than banks and other secured creditors.  This is especially significant during a recesssion, since large numbers of employers will likely go belly up. 
The CAW is holding a rally at Queens Park today to pressure the Liberals to make changes to the provincial laws governing severance pay.  Among the changes they want are:

  • A new government fund that would guarantee the payment of severance pay up to $10,000 per person when employers won’t or can’t pay.  The NDP had a program like this in the early 1990s (another bad economic period) called the Employee Wage Protection Program, but it was repealed by the Conservatives.  The federal government has a plan called the Wage Earner Protection Program, which allows employees to claim up to $3,254 for unpaid amounts (including severance pay).

 

  • An end to the minimum 5 year  qualification period for entitlement to severance pay and new look at the other eligibility requirements that require an employer to have an annual payroll of $2.5 million or to have terminated 50 employees or more in a 6 month period.  Keep in mind that the requirement to pay severance only applies to employers who meet one of these two strict requirements.  For everyone else, there is no entitlement to severance pay at all, and many, many, employees in Ontario work for small employers who would never be required to pay severance pay under current restrictions.

 

  • An end to practice of suspending employment insurance benefits until severance payments have been used up (this would require a change to the Federal employment insurance legislation)

The full CAW submission is available here.  Do you think that state should fund severance pay when employers won’t pay?   If you are interested in this issue, and in seeing a labour protest in action, head on down to Queens Park today at noon.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is a Full Professor of Work Law and Labour Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Most Downloaded Labour & Employment Law Authors
next post
Debates about the Employment Insurance Model

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018


Follow Us On Social Media

Substack
Bluesky

BlueSky Latest Posts

No posts available.

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Tax Law
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.