The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

OPSEU Director on McGuinty's Wage Freezes

by David Doorey November 19, 2010
written by David Doorey November 19, 2010

I’ve mentioned before how the Ontario Premier has imposed a wage freeze on nonunion public sector workers, and  “asked” unionized public sector workers to voluntarily agree to a wage freeze.  So far, surprise mcguintyof surprises, the unionized workers are not giving McGuinty what he wants, nor are interest arbitrators imposing wage freezes into new public sector collective agreements.
I noted that labour relations people are not very sympathetic to government imposed wage freezes on public sector workers because they recognize that governments make choices about where to spend taxpayer money.  For example, they can give corporate tax cuts or give wage increases to their employees.  Understandably, the workers don’t usually take too kindly to being told they need to take a wage cut to pay for a corporate tax cut.
In an editorial in the Star today, the President of the Ontario Public Service Employees Union discusses there issues.  Here are the hilights of his argument:

  • the proposed wage freeze would save the government $1.8 billion per year.
  • the government has introduced corporate tax cuts that cost the government $2.4 billion per year
  • Canada’s taxes are already low compared to other advanced industrial nations:  KPMG found that in 2010, Canada’s “total tax index” was 2nd lowest of its 10 competitor countries, and Toronto has lower tax rates for businesses than all U.S. and European cities studied
  • Despite 10 years of corporate tax cuts at the Federal and Provincial level in Ontario, investment has actually declined.  That refutes the conservative claim that tax cuts increase investment.
  • Every dollar spent on  a corporate tax cut creates only 30 cents of economic activity, whereas measures that put an extra dollar in the hands of low income workers boosts the economy by $1.70

The argument, therefore, is that policies that put money into hands of workers fuel the economy more so than do policies that lower corporate taxes.
Do you buy this argument?  Or, do you believe that the Ontario government should attempt to pass a law ordering a freeze of public sector wages?

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is a Full Professor of Work Law and Labour Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Is Dismissing a Union Supporter for Facebook Comments Illegal?
next post
Doorey's Beginners' Guide to the Charter and Workplace Law

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018


Follow Us On Social Media

Substack
Bluesky

BlueSky Latest Posts

No posts available.

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Tax Law
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.