The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Michael Lynk on Labour Law and the New Inequality

by David Doorey June 10, 2009
written by David Doorey June 10, 2009

   A while back, I advertised that Professor Michael Lynk of Western Law School was presenting the Rand Memorial Lecture on labour law at the University of New Brunswick.  His talk is now a law journal article that will be published in the forthcoming UNB Law Journal.  A copy of the paper is now available for free download on Michael’s SSRN site.  Here is the link:
Here is the abstract:

Rising economic inequality in Canada and the Western world has become an 
unspoken but influential political theme over the past quarter century. 
The Great Compression between the late 1940s and the 1980s – which 
brought an unlamented end to the pre-war Gilded Age and its social 
inequities, established a post-war middle-class society in the 
industrial democracies, and created a host of equalizing institutions, 
including a vibrant union movement – has been unravelling since the rise 
of modern political conservatism. A hydraulic relationship exists 
between unionization and inequality. Countries that have higher 
unionization rates tend to have lower patterns of economic inequality. 
And as unionization rates decline, inequality tends to rise. In Canada, 
the political impulse to reform labour laws has been waning since the 
early 1990s, shortly after Canadian unions had reached their numerical 
zenith. As income and wealth inequality levels rose, labour’s share of 
the Gross Domestic Product has declined to record lows in the post-war 
era, wages have stagnated and most of the economic productivity gains 
over the past 25 years have been captured by those at the very top of 
the income scale. One significant explanation for the eroding levels of 
unionization in Canada has been the country’s stagnant labour laws. In 
particular, statutory changes to the union certification process in a 
number of Canadian jurisdictions has diminished the ability of unions to 
protect their representational levels. Empirical social science suggests 
that labour laws matter, not only for unionization levels, but as an 
important tool to enhance economic egalitarianism.

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is a Full Professor of Work Law and Labour Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Harper and the Steelworkers, Together at Last…
next post
Savage and Butovsky on Anti-Scab Laws

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018


Follow Us On Social Media

Substack
Bluesky

BlueSky Latest Posts

No posts available.

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Tax Law
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.