The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • In the Media
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Charter of Rights and FreedomsSaskatchewanSupreme Court of CanadaUnions and Collective Bargaining

Saskatchewan: The long arms of the law still denying Unifor Local 594 members the ability to obtain a collective agreement

by Ronni Nordal May 8, 2020
written by Ronni Nordal May 8, 2020

Written by Ronni Nordal, Q.C., Regina

Consumer’s Co-op Refineries Limited (CCRL) locked out members of Unifor Local 594 on December 5, 2019.  As I wrote in my March 11, 2020 post Is there a Right to Picket in Saskatchewan, CCRL’s ability to obtain an interim injunction, and ultimately to have Unifor Local 594 held in contempt of the injunction has substantially interfered with the Charter rights of Unifor Local 594 members to engage in picket activities for the purpose of collective bargaining.  The lockout continues because CCRL rejected the recommendations of government appointed mediator Vince Ready and has, in fact, indicated it now requires further concessions from Unifor Local 594. 

The December 29, 2019 Order places specific limits on Unifor Local 594’s ability to impede ingress/egress from 5 civic addresses in the City of Regina and from one facility in the R.M. of Sherwood (see paragraph 9 of February 12, 2020 contempt decision, Robertson J). 

Without the ability to exert economic pressure through meaningful picketing at the CCRL site in Regina – members of Unifor Local 594 attempted to exercise the Charter protected right to picket by setting up a picket line at the Co-op Bulk Fuel site in Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan starting Wednesday May 7, 2020, a location not covered by the Order.

However, the RCMP attended at the Co-op Bulk Fuel site in Moose jaw today and told Unifor Local 594 members they were carrying out a mischief investigation and that if individuals on the picket line did not provide identification they would potentially be charged with obstruction. 

The picket line continued and Unifor Local 594 members were stopping vehicles for up to 30 minutes from entering the Moose Jaw site and communicating during picketing.  On Friday, May 8, 2020 the RCMP attended and advised that if entry to the Moose Jaw premises was obstructed, charges would be laid and the picketers would be arrested.

At the Moose Jaw site the morning of Friday, May 8, 2020, an RCMP officer directed the picketers as follows:

Basically if trucks come in and you want to talk to the driver – to have a little chat with him, should not have a problem – but you cannot stop them from entering the premises.  We have consulted with Crown Counsel and what you have been doing for the past 2 days has been the threshold for a charge of mischief.

It appears that as of May 8, 2020 the CCRL can continue its operation with its replacement worker onsite camp while it has been declared illegal for Unifor Local 594 members to exercise any meaningful right to picket.  The right to picket in Saskatchewan has been reduced to standing on the side of the road and waving to passersby, unless a driver voluntarily elects to stop and talk to the locked out workers. The cycle is complete, the law protects the right of the employer to set up a work camp to house replacement workers during a pandemic while using its full force to ensure picketing has no effect on the employer’s operations. The 2015 Supreme Court of Canada Labour Trilogy was seen as a milestone event for all workers in Canada —— who would have thought it would all be down hill from there. 

Ronni Nordal, “Right to Picket All But Dead in Saskatchewan: RCMP Moves In to Protect Co-Op in Protracted Lockout” Canadian Law of Work (May 8 2020): https://lawofwork.ca/?p=12467


0 comment
3
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
Ronni Nordal

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Challenges Faced by Immigrants Working in the Medical Field
next post
CUPW Alleges that #Foodora Acted Unlawfully by Pulling Out of Canada. Here’s the Complaint.

You may also like

What Does Quebec’s Bill 89 Mean For the...

September 4, 2025

So Long Section 107 of the Canada Labour...

August 26, 2025

How Three Simple Labor Laws Helped Unions Organize...

August 7, 2025

What If UBER is a Federal Undertaking?

July 4, 2025

DHL Requests Permission to Violate Labour Laws

June 19, 2025

Ontario’s Controversial Bill 5 and Labour Rights: A...

June 6, 2025

How Will the Canada Post Dispute End? (And...

May 23, 2025

Canada Post Collective Bargaining Wrap Up: Where Things...

December 19, 2024

Feds Dust off Section 107 again at Canada...

December 13, 2024

The End of Secondary Picketing, Again?

December 9, 2024


Follow Us On Social Media

Substack
Bluesky

BlueSky Latest Posts

  • Get to this post

    David J. Doorey (aka The Law of Work) @thelawofwork.bsky.social 9 hours

    Had an interesting meeting today with an activist shareholder organization exploring ways to pressure franchisors to take greater responsibility for labor abuses in franchisees.

    There’s definitely space for legal regulation on this issue as well.

    Franchise Law is Labor Law!
  • Get to this post

    David J. Doorey (aka The Law of Work) @thelawofwork.bsky.social 1 day

    Sorry to hear of the passing of Leo Gerard, former head of the Canadian and International Steelworkers' Union.

    I had the pleasure of meeting Leo several times. He was one of the smartest and toughest, but also kind people in the labour relations world.

    www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gender
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • New Zealand
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Tax Law
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.