Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
Charter of Rights and FreedomsSaskatchewanSupreme Court of CanadaUnions and Collective Bargaining

Saskatchewan: The long arms of the law still denying Unifor Local 594 members the ability to obtain a collective agreement

by Ronni Nordal May 8, 2020
written by Ronni Nordal May 8, 2020

Written by Ronni Nordal, Q.C., Regina

Consumer’s Co-op Refineries Limited (CCRL) locked out members of Unifor Local 594 on December 5, 2019.  As I wrote in my March 11, 2020 post Is there a Right to Picket in Saskatchewan, CCRL’s ability to obtain an interim injunction, and ultimately to have Unifor Local 594 held in contempt of the injunction has substantially interfered with the Charter rights of Unifor Local 594 members to engage in picket activities for the purpose of collective bargaining.  The lockout continues because CCRL rejected the recommendations of government appointed mediator Vince Ready and has, in fact, indicated it now requires further concessions from Unifor Local 594. 

The December 29, 2019 Order places specific limits on Unifor Local 594’s ability to impede ingress/egress from 5 civic addresses in the City of Regina and from one facility in the R.M. of Sherwood (see paragraph 9 of February 12, 2020 contempt decision, Robertson J). 

Without the ability to exert economic pressure through meaningful picketing at the CCRL site in Regina – members of Unifor Local 594 attempted to exercise the Charter protected right to picket by setting up a picket line at the Co-op Bulk Fuel site in Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan starting Wednesday May 7, 2020, a location not covered by the Order.

However, the RCMP attended at the Co-op Bulk Fuel site in Moose jaw today and told Unifor Local 594 members they were carrying out a mischief investigation and that if individuals on the picket line did not provide identification they would potentially be charged with obstruction. 

The picket line continued and Unifor Local 594 members were stopping vehicles for up to 30 minutes from entering the Moose Jaw site and communicating during picketing.  On Friday, May 8, 2020 the RCMP attended and advised that if entry to the Moose Jaw premises was obstructed, charges would be laid and the picketers would be arrested.

At the Moose Jaw site the morning of Friday, May 8, 2020, an RCMP officer directed the picketers as follows:

Basically if trucks come in and you want to talk to the driver – to have a little chat with him, should not have a problem – but you cannot stop them from entering the premises.  We have consulted with Crown Counsel and what you have been doing for the past 2 days has been the threshold for a charge of mischief.

It appears that as of May 8, 2020 the CCRL can continue its operation with its replacement worker onsite camp while it has been declared illegal for Unifor Local 594 members to exercise any meaningful right to picket.  The right to picket in Saskatchewan has been reduced to standing on the side of the road and waving to passersby, unless a driver voluntarily elects to stop and talk to the locked out workers. The cycle is complete, the law protects the right of the employer to set up a work camp to house replacement workers during a pandemic while using its full force to ensure picketing has no effect on the employer’s operations. The 2015 Supreme Court of Canada Labour Trilogy was seen as a milestone event for all workers in Canada —— who would have thought it would all be down hill from there. 

Ronni Nordal, “Right to Picket All But Dead in Saskatchewan: RCMP Moves In to Protect Co-Op in Protracted Lockout” Canadian Law of Work (May 8 2020): https://lawofwork.ca/?p=12467


1 comment
3
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
Ronni Nordal

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

1 comment

Lorelei Cornell May 8, 2020 - 11:05 pm

This is such a well written and truthful article. How on earth is this happening. The locked out employees are having all their rights taken aeay

Reply
previous post
Challenges Faced by Immigrants Working in the Medical Field
next post
CUPW Alleges that #Foodora Acted Unlawfully by Pulling Out of Canada. Here’s the Complaint.

You may also like

What is a Minority Union?

January 4, 2021

Canadian Bar Association Podcast: “After the Pandemic: Protecting...

December 17, 2020

David Doorey on Jacobin: “Collective Bargaining Needs a...

December 16, 2020

Arbitrator: Employees Must Get Swabbed for COVID

December 16, 2020

“Autonomous Worker” Regulation

December 1, 2020

Reflecting on the Use of Neutrality Agreements in...

November 27, 2020

Video: Prof. David Doorey and Lawyer Ryan White...

November 26, 2020

Webinar Video: The Future of Labor Law, with...

November 17, 2020

What Could Biden’s Labor Secretary Do?

November 12, 2020

One-Day Wildcat Strike by Alberta Health Workers Likely...

October 28, 2020

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 209 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
13 Jan

New Post: @TheLawofWork asks:

"Is '60 the New 50' in Assessing Length of Reasonable Notice in Wrongful Dismissal Cases?

http://lawofwork.ca/60new50/

#WrongfulDismissal #EmpLaw #LawofWork

Reply on Twitter 1349390367511207939Retweet on Twitter 1349390367511207939Like on Twitter 1349390367511207939Twitter 1349390367511207939
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
8 Jan

Try this again with a working link this time:

New: A fun one to open a new term of Employment Law, by @TheLawofWork:

"Would Rioting at Canada's Parliament Building Be Grounds for Dismissal Without Notice?"

http://lawofwork.ca/?p=13203

Reply on Twitter 1347578258100006914Retweet on Twitter 13475782581000069142Like on Twitter 13475782581000069142Twitter 1347578258100006914
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
4 Jan

Some thoughts on how Canadian labor law would deal with Google employees who joined @AlphabetWorkers (or something like it) in Canada. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1346114537351766017

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

First post of 2021 looks at a story in the @nytimes today about a new minority union at @Google. Prof. David Doorey (@TheLawofWork) asks:

"What is a Minority Union?"

http://lawofwork.ca

Reply on Twitter 1346215770561392641Retweet on Twitter 13462157705613926413Like on Twitter 13462157705613926414Twitter 1346215770561392641
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.