The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Charter of Rights and FreedomsCOVID-19Employment RegulationQuebec

COVID-19 and Public Education Collective Agreements in Quebec

by Travis Fast March 20, 2020
written by Travis Fast March 20, 2020

Written by Travis Fast and Martin Dumas, Laval University

On Thursday morning the 19th of March 2020 the Canadian press was buzzing with news that the government of Quebec had suspended collective agreements in the public education sector.  In its online edition, CTV Montreal ran the story COVID-19: Quebec teachers in shock after government suspends collective agreements.  As reported in the story, the president of the Centrale des syndicats du Québec (CSQ) said that, “they were told their entire collective agreements no longer apply when there are certain provisions in place, such as emergency measures.”

Although the story and the information was misleading in some respects, it nonetheless raises a couple of pertinent questions and concerns.  In this short blog post we will address each aspect in turn.

The misleading aspects of the story

The first point to make clear is that s. 118 and 123 of the Public Health Act[1] give the government a broad range of powers once a public health emergency has been declared including the general power to “order any other measure necessary to protect the health of the population.”[2]

However, as required and published in the Gazette Officielle,[3] the government made very clear that it was not suspending collective agreements but rather making specific, albeit important, amendments to “collective and other agreements… between school boards, on the one hand, and all unions, on the other hand.”   Three specific aspects of these agreements were subject to ad hoc amendment: (1) the assignment and classification of personnel; (2) work scheduling; and (3) “compensation that is additional to the remuneration or compensation paid for normal work hours.”

As important as these three aspects of collective agreements are, they do not exhaust collective agreements and thus cannot fairly be said to be tantamount to suspending collective agreements in the public education sector. Perhaps also noteworthy is that the amendments were made specifically to agreements covering public sector workers in the education sector and not to all public sector workers.

Pertinent questions and concerns

To our minds, one pertinent question this issue raises is why did the government chose the kludge of dictating rather than negotiating or at the very least consulting with the respective unions?  To be sure, emergency situations may alter the modalities of the duty to bargain in good faith. But does the current situation, in which teacher’s unions show signs of collaboration with state authorities, really support the failure to comply with such a fundamental duty?

A second pertinent question is why did the government think it necessary to provide themselves the power to abrogate compensation requirements above normal work hour levels? These are questions that should be addressed by the government and are examples of prematurely ignored subjects of negotiations.

Outside of these two general questions, the amendments raise some important concerns as to potential abuses of these ad hoc powers.  Abuse of power is a real concern as some formulations are rather vague, as in “to allow the employer to meet needs.” And authorities will also have to interpret the text sensibly: if “Personnel members may therefore be assigned to tasks under another job title”, such a transition will necessarily have to take the competence of the people assigned into consideration.

Travis Fast & Martin Dumas, “COVID-19 and Public Education Collective Agreements in Quebec” Canadian Law of Work Forum (March 20 2020): https://lawofwork.ca/covid-19-and-public-education-collective-agreements-in-quebec/


[1] S-2.2 – Public Health Act

[2] S-2.2, Public Health Act, s.123.

[3] GAZETTE OFFICIELLE DU QUÉBEC, March 18, 2020, Vol. 152, No. 12A

#Quebec #COVID #CollectiveBargaining #Teachers
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
Travis Fast

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Targeted Basic Income: An Equitable Policy Response to COVID-19
next post
Responding to a potential COVID-19 case in the workplace – steady as she goes

You may also like

How Canadian Unions Responded to Vaccine Mandates, Protests,...

March 17, 2022

Reforming Non-Compete Law: A Cross Border Perspective

March 3, 2022

The Problem With Ontario’s Proposed Gig Worker Law...

February 28, 2022

Can Human Rights Law Help Workers Fired for...

February 18, 2022

Will Conservatives Add “Vaccine Status” to Human Rights...

February 9, 2022

Is UFCW’s Mysterious “Agreement” With Uber Lawful?

January 27, 2022

Would the Recommendations in Ontario’s New Report on...

December 10, 2021

The New European Platform Work Directive Through a...

December 9, 2021

Why is Alberta Making Workplaces Less Safe? Alberta...

December 1, 2021

COVID Vaccination Policies in the Workplace: How It’s...

November 23, 2021

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 334 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
10h

50% of watching @CNN is listening to possible side effects of drugs being hocked.

Reply on Twitter 1540106698198753282Retweet on Twitter 15401066981987532821Like on Twitter 15401066981987532824Twitter 1540106698198753282
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
14h

Yet another reason to not shop at Walmart

kira 👾@kirawontmiss

bro terrorized everybody in walmart

Reply on Twitter 1540041918565998594Retweet on Twitter 15400419185659985941Like on Twitter 15400419185659985943Twitter 1540041918565998594
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
16h

lol. Classic.

I was told by a Saskatchewan arbitrator that he wasn’t interested in arguments about how similar statutory language is interpreted ‘out east’. Because they do things their own way in Saskatchewan.

Eric Sherkin@ericsherkin

@TheLawofWork I was a 1st yr associate arguing a motion in Guelph on short notice (partner on the file was speaking at a conference and didn't want to miss it) and being told by the judge that "I know how things are in Toronto, but sharp practice stops when you cross the Humber River."

Reply on Twitter 1540016476551274497Retweet on Twitter 15400164765512744971Like on Twitter 15400164765512744974Twitter 1540016476551274497
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.