Yesterday sure was an interesting day in Wisconsin and here in Toronto, and the events that occurred share an interesting synergy.
In case you missed it, the Governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker, ran on a promise to cut spending and dismantle public sector unions and collective bargaining. Sound familiar?
Walker was elected Governor, and proceeded to introduce some of the most drastic anti-collective bargaining legislation seen in the past century anywhere in the
The recall movement garnered a shocking number of signatures, over 1 million, according to recent reports. Only 540,208 signatures are needed to require a vote to replace Walker. Only 3 times in the history of the United States have Those petitions were filed yesterday. This means it is very likely that the Governor will face a recall election this spring. Of course, the Republicans plan to drag this out as long as possible by insisting that every single signature be verified, while the Governor continues with his multi-million dollar advertising campaign funded by huge corporate donors.
Meanwhile, back in Toronto, our own Mayor lost a big battle in Council yesterday over his desired spending cuts. Council turned against the Mayors’ Ford, and voted
In both Toronto and Wisconsin, populist politicians who ran on cutting public spending and destroying unions have run into an unexpected backlash. History shows us that when you swing the political pendulum too far in one direction, it always swings back. We may be seeing that now in Toronto and Wisconsin.
The next question for Toronto is whether the Mayors Ford can succeed in their promise to eliminate the job security provisions in the public sector collective agreements. Already, the City is pulling back. In it’s last offer to CUPE 416, it proposed keeping the job security but only for workers with more than 25 years’ service instead of the 10 year cutoff in the old agreement. The union is offering a three year wage freeze.
Can the City win a public relations battle if it forces a work stoppage over job security protections for workers with between 10-25 years’ service?