Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
COVID-19Employment RegulationOntario

Worker Rights During the COVID-19 Pandemic

by Shibil Siddiqi March 25, 2020
written by Shibil Siddiqi March 25, 2020

Written by Shibil Siddiqi

Worker Rights During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Novel Corona Virus Disease 2019 or COVD-19 has left many workers in a bind. On the one hand, workers need to be able to work to support themselves and their families. On the other, for reasons of public and personal health, workers may wish to not report to work at this time. This post covers some worker rights and protections in relation to reporting or not reporting to work as guaranteed by the Employment Standards Act (ESA) and certain other issues arising under human rights and occupational health and safety and workers’ compensation legislation in Ontario.

Expanded Leaves Under the Employment Standards Act

On March 17, 2020, the Government of Ontario declared a state of emergency under s. 7.0.1(1) of the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, closing down schools, day cares, libraries, bars, restaurants (except takeout) and many other public venues. This declaration also triggered s. 50.1 of the Employment Standards Act allowing for unpaid and job-protected Emergency Leaves for employees unable to perform their duties due to a declaration of emergency; subject to an order for quarantine or self-isolation; or to provide care or assistance to a family member or to a relative who is dependent upon the employee’s care.

These narrow protections were significantly expanded on March 19 with the passage in Legislature of the Employment Standards Amendment Act (Infectious Disease Emergencies), 2020, which amended s. 50.1 of the ESA to include a number of provisions dealing specifically with designated “infectious diseases” including COVID-19.

When an infectious disease has been designated, under the new s. 50.1(1.1)(b) an employee may be entitled to an unpaid leave if they wish to “self-isolate”, as long as the employee is acting on information or directions provided by a public health authority. In other words, this section may provide broad protections to employees who may wish to not come to work and may want to take an unpaid job-protected leave to self-isolate. This amendment to the ESA may recognize that in times of dangerous pandemics, any exposure to the public in or en route to the workplace may constitute a danger to the employee’s (and to the public’s) health and safety.

Employees are also now entitled to an unpaid leave to care for a sick relative. A broad list of enumerated relatives is found under s. 50.1(8). Further, employees are also entitled to an unpaid leave where school and/or daycare closures have imposed additional childcare obligations on them. With schools in Ontario now closed indefinitely, most parents will be dealing with additional childcare obligations.

Employers are entitled to ask employees to provide reasonable evidence under the circumstances that the employee is entitled to the leave. However, in the case of infectious diseases the employer cannot ask the employee to produce a doctor’s note (see s. 50.1(4.1)). This provision again protects the health and safety of workers who may risk exposure by attending at hospitals to obtain sick notes, and it protects scarce health resources when they are sorely needed 

While these leaves are unpaid, employees are entitled to continued benefits, health plans, pension contributions provided by the employer. An employer is not allowed to reprise against any employee taking an Emergency Leave or infectious disease leave.

It is important to note that the protections to take Emergency Leaves provided under ESA s. 50.1 only apply for the duration of a declared state of emergency. Emergency Leaves generally end when the declared state of emergency is lifted. However, leaves under the new amendments for infectious diseases last for as long as COVID-19 continues to be designated as an infectious disease. There is no stated maximum duration while the designation remains in place.

Outside of a government-ordered closure of non-essential business, and subject to leaves under ESA s. 50.1, generally employers are still able to lawfully require otherwise healthy workers to report to work. There may be an exception to this is you are immunocompromised or medically vulnerable, or if you are responsible as a caregiver for someone who is. There may also be an exception based on your family status if you have childcare or other family care obligations.

What happens if an otherwise healthy worker contracts COVID-19?

First and foremost, you will need to time to self-isolate, recover and get healthy again. For as long as COVID-19 is designated an infectious disease, workers are entitled to a job-protected leave under the amendments to ESA s. 50.1.

With respect to human rights protections for a job-protected leave, traditionally the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has not recognized short-term or transitory illnesses (like a cold or flu) as a “disability” under the Code. This leaves workers vulnerable to a finding that contracting COVID-19 might not trigger an employer’s duty to accommodate.

However, on March 13, 2020, the Ontario Human Rights Commission adopted a significant policy position that “negative treatment of employees who have, or are perceived to have, COVID-19, for reasons unrelated to public health and safety, is discriminatory and prohibited under the Code. Employers have a duty to accommodate employees in relation to COVID-19, unless it would amount to undue hardship based on cost, or health and safety.” While these policy positions are not binding on the HRTO, they have great persuasive value. It may be possible to argue that, given the deep public health, social and economic impact of COVID-19, those who contract the illness should be afforded protection akin to workers living with a disability. This would mean that employees should not be sanctioned for absenteeism if health officials have quarantined them or advised them to self-isolate.

In this light, workers who contract COVID-19 can likely take job-protected leaves under both the ESA and the Code.    

Getting Paid While on Leave

Whether you are paid for voluntary or forced leaves from work depends on individual employment contracts and employer policies. If paid sick leaves are provided for by your employer, you should remain entitled to them.

The ESA itself no longer requires employers to provide any paid sick days. However, you may be eligible for Employment Insurance Sickness Benefits. As of April, 2020, workers not eligible for EI benefits will have access to Emergency Support and Emergency Care Benefits through the Canada Revenue Agency.  

Finally, if you contract COVID-19 at the workplace, it may be possible for you to claim compensation through the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). While it is difficult to predict how receptive the WSIB will be to such claims, it is generally advisable to apply for WSIB benefits as soon as possible upon becoming ill in the workplace.  

Your responsibilities

Workers have both rights and responsibilities under the Occupational Health and Safety Act. Included among the latter is the responsibility to report any known health or safety hazards to your employer. In the current circumstances, this likely includes a duty to inform your employer if you have recently travelled outside of the country and/or if you believe you may have been exposed to the virus. You should do so by calling, texting or emailing your manager and seeking their direction; do not attend at your workplace, even if you have a scheduled shift.

If you work with higher risk populations (for example, seniors in care homes), your employer may require you to wear a face mask, gloves, or other personal protective equipment (PPE). It is your employer’s responsibility to ensure you know how to properly use (and dispose of) any PPE, but you have a duty to make use of the equipment that is provided.     

Conclusion

While job-protected leaves have become a public health necessity, the fact that these leaves are unpaid is not sustainable. Time will tell whether a government bailout package, including the Emergency Support and Emergency Care Benefits the Federal Government will announce in April, are sufficient to address the income needs of workers for the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19 is not only a national but a global public health emergency. Its cost should not be disproportionately borne by marginalized workers. After all, even as we practice social-distancing and self-isolation, the immutable fact is that we’re all in this together.

Citation: Shibil Siddiqi, “Worker Rights During the COVID-19 Pandemic” Canadian Law of Work Forum (March 25 2020): https://lawofwork.ca/worker-rights-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

#WorkersRights #EmploymentStandardsCOVID19
1 comment
1
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
Shibil Siddiqi

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

1 comment

Jerry April 11, 2020 - 6:45 pm

Our company has a contract for 2 yrs with the school board possible lay off coming told temporary but after 13 weeks is it a permanent situation. The company has us on a 3 day work week which is ok by us rather than being laid off . If the company is getting paid is this ok?

Reply
previous post
Relaxing Restrictions on Occupational Licensing as a Response to COVID-19
next post
A Plain Language Chart Describing Worker Entitlements in Ontario During COVID19

You may also like

Canadian Bar Association Podcast: “After the Pandemic: Protecting...

December 17, 2020

Arbitrator: Employees Must Get Swabbed for COVID

December 16, 2020

“Autonomous Worker” Regulation

December 1, 2020

Reflecting on the Use of Neutrality Agreements in...

November 27, 2020

Video: Prof. David Doorey and Lawyer Ryan White...

November 26, 2020

What Could Biden’s Labor Secretary Do?

November 12, 2020

Alberta Government Continues Rollback of Worker Protections

November 10, 2020

Dispatches from Canada on the Big California Uber...

October 23, 2020

The Classification of “Gig” Workers in Canadian Work...

September 23, 2020

Do Ontario’s Collective Bargaining Laws Protect Migrant Worker...

September 16, 2020

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 209 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
13 Jan

New Post: @TheLawofWork asks:

"Is '60 the New 50' in Assessing Length of Reasonable Notice in Wrongful Dismissal Cases?

http://lawofwork.ca/60new50/

#WrongfulDismissal #EmpLaw #LawofWork

Reply on Twitter 1349390367511207939Retweet on Twitter 1349390367511207939Like on Twitter 1349390367511207939Twitter 1349390367511207939
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
8 Jan

Try this again with a working link this time:

New: A fun one to open a new term of Employment Law, by @TheLawofWork:

"Would Rioting at Canada's Parliament Building Be Grounds for Dismissal Without Notice?"

http://lawofwork.ca/?p=13203

Reply on Twitter 1347578258100006914Retweet on Twitter 13475782581000069142Like on Twitter 13475782581000069142Twitter 1347578258100006914
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
4 Jan

Some thoughts on how Canadian labor law would deal with Google employees who joined @AlphabetWorkers (or something like it) in Canada. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1346114537351766017

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

First post of 2021 looks at a story in the @nytimes today about a new minority union at @Google. Prof. David Doorey (@TheLawofWork) asks:

"What is a Minority Union?"

http://lawofwork.ca

Reply on Twitter 1346215770561392641Retweet on Twitter 13462157705613926413Like on Twitter 13462157705613926414Twitter 1346215770561392641
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.