Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
Law of Work Archive

Why Union Ordered to Pay $50,000 Damages for an Unlawful Strike

by David Doorey October 11, 2011
written by David Doorey October 11, 2011

Canada has one of the most restrictive rights to strike in the advanced economic world.  One example of the very restrictive nature of the right to strike here is the prohibition on “midterm” strikes or lockouts, which goes back to the early days of modern labour legislation and Prime Minister MacKenzie King in the 1940s.  This prohibition says that there can be no strike or lockout during the period in which a collective agreement is in force.  All disputes must be sent to a labour arbitrator instead.  That was a distinctly Canadian addition.
The result of this is that it is a violation of labour relations legislation for a union to strike during a collective agreement.  And since Canadian legislation also reads into every collective agreement a term prohibiting strikes and lockouts, such a strike is also a breach of the collective agreement.

Therefore, if workers engage in an illegal strike during a collective agreement, they are in breach of the collective agreement. The employer can file a grievance as a result.  What remedy do you think the employer would be asking for?

Money.   If the employees shut down production, then an employer may suffer financial loss.  I say “may”, because sometimes a short work stoppage will not cause the employer any financial harm.  For example, the employees may be able to make up any lost production when they return to work.  However, as a recent arbitration decision reminds us, unions mights be ordered to pay damages even if there is no direct lost production caused by an illegal strike.
The Canada Post Arbitration Award Ordering Union to Pay $35,000 Punitive Damages
The case involved illegal “midterm” strikes at 3 Canada Post facilities out west  in 2008.   The decision is here, and it was written by a leading arbitrator named Michel Picher.
The strikes lasted between one hour and two days.  The union argued that in the end there was no harm done to the employer’s production at all, and therefore that it was not a strike at all.  Picher rejected that argument, noting that during the period of the strike, no work was done.  That was a strike.  Moreover, since union stewards were involved in encouraging and participating in the strike, the Union itself could be held liable for the strike.
The most interesting part of the Award relates to the damages.
At one facility, the strike caused no financial or production harm, since all the mail was eventually delivered and no additional costs were incurred.  However, at the other two facilities the employer incurred additional costs caused by the illegal strike in terms of additional overtime to deal with the backlog and travel costs to transport an employer rep to the strike site.
Amount ordered for production and travel costs incurred by employer: $2652.
Does the employer actually have to suffer a net loss from the strike? The Union argued that the employer was not out of pocket at all, since it saved more than these costs by not having to pay the workers for the time there were on strike.  Picher rejected that argument, noting that the fact that employees “chose to forgo their wages by engaging in an unlawful strike” does not change the fact that the employer absorbed exceptional costs as a result of the strike.  Picher wrote that “there was no principled basis upon which the unlawful conduct of the employees and the union can be viewed as mitigating the employer’s damages”.
Does the Union have to pay the employer’s legal costs in the arbitration? Yes.  Legal Costs:  $12, 882.
Can the Arbitrator Order Punitive Costs Against the Union? Yes.
The Employer asked for over $200,000 in additional “punitive damages”.  Punitive damages are damages not related to actual financial loss, but that are intended to punish the wrongdoer and to act as a deterrent for future breaches.  Picher rules that it is well-settled that arbitrators have the authority to order punitive damages for breach of a collective agreement, although that power should be used sparingly.   Here, the lockout received substantial media attention, that can be assumed to have created a negative business image of Canada Post, something intended by the strikers.  In the end, Picher orders $35,000 in punitive damages against the union, an amount he believed sent a clear message to the Union and would act as a sufficient deterrent against future illegal strikes.

Total Damages Union Must pay Canada Post:  $50, 535.

Is that a fair outcome?
Here, the union officials were directly involved in organizing the strike.  Do you think the outcome would/should be different if union members engage in an unlawful strike without any direct involvement of Union officials?
 

2 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is the Director of the School of HRM at York and Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and on the Advisory Board of the Osgoode Certificate program in Labour Law. He is a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program and a member of the International Advisory Committee on Harvard University’s Clean Slate Project, which is re-imaging labor law for the 21st century

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
We're Hiring. Deadline is October 31st.
next post
What Does Minister of Labour Mean When She Says the "Process" Not Working at Air Canada

You may also like

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

A Successful Strike Vote is All That Stands...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Putin Invites Trump to Moscow for Second Meeting...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 218 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
7h

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211852Twitter 1364627677785821185
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
7h

Here's my latest in @jacobinmag.

If Ontario's labor laws applied in Alabama, the Amazon vote would have been held months ago so workers could get back to their jobs. Instead, the NLRA permits Amazon to conduct a months' long onslaught of anti-union propaganda. https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1364613560425275392

Jacobin@jacobinmag

Amazon workers in Alabama are voting on whether to unionize, but the company is bombarding them with anti-union propaganda. In Canada, by contrast, votes are held quickly, making it harder for companies to stack the deck — a model that can work in the US. http://jacobinmag.com/2021/02/amazon-alabama-canada-labor-law-union-vote

Reply on Twitter 1364623976174092316Retweet on Twitter 13646239761740923168Like on Twitter 136462397617409231613Twitter 1364623976174092316
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
8h

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364605259071561730Retweet on Twitter 13646052590715617304Like on Twitter 13646052590715617304Twitter 1364605259071561730
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.